Abstract
Background: Female genital mutilation (FGM) or female circumcision is the removal of variable amounts of tissue from the female external genitalia. It is practised all over the world on very young girls. This study was conducted in Sudan where FGM is a criminal offence and not a religious dictate. We assessed the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of this practice among Khartoum university students and compared the differences between male and female student responses.
Methods: An anonymised detailed questionnaire was distributed among the university students. In addition to the participant's age, marital status, course studying, details regarding their attitude, knowledge of the practice of FGM, and their own experiences were collected.
Results: Of the 500 questionnaires distributed, 414 (82.8%) were returned from 192 (46%) females and 222 (54%) males. 109 (56.8%) of the female respondents were themselves circumcised.18.8% of the male students and 9.4% of the female students thought FGM was recommended by their religion. Only 90 (46.9%) female students compared with 133 (59.9%) male students thought FGM was illegal. Though 16 (8.3%) female respondents thought FGM would increase their chances of marriage, the majority, 166 (74.8%), of the male students would prefer a non-circumcised female.
Conclusions: This study shows that 109 (56.8%) female university students who responded were circumcised. Confusing religious messages and ambiguous laws seem to be responsible for the continuation of this practice. The study highlights the partnership that needs to be established between religious leaders and educationalists to end this medieval practice.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (107.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Allam M. F., de Irala-Estevez J., Navajas R. F., del Castillo A. S., Hoashi J. S., Pankovich M. B., Liceaga J. R. Students' knowledge of and attitudes about female circumcision in Egypt. N Engl J Med. 1999 Nov 11;341(20):1552–1553. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199911113412017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Black J. A., Debelle G. D. Female genital mutilation in Britain. BMJ. 1995 Jun 17;310(6994):1590–1592. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6994.1590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dirie M. A., Lindmark G. A hospital study of the complications of female circumcision. Trop Doct. 1991 Oct;21(4):146–148. doi: 10.1177/004947559102100404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Epstein D., Graham P., Rimsza M. Medical complications of female genital mutilation. J Am Coll Health. 2001 May;49(6):275–280. doi: 10.1080/07448480109596314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ladjali M., Rattray T. W., Walder R. J. Female genital mutilation. BMJ. 1993 Aug 21;307(6902):460–460. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6902.460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sami I. R. Female circumcision with special reference to the Sudan. Ann Trop Paediatr. 1986 Jun;6(2):99–115. doi: 10.1080/02724936.1986.11748419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shandall A. A. Circumcision and infibulation of females: a general consideration of the problem and a clinical study of the complications in Sudanese women. Sudan Med J. 1967;5(4):178–212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Toubia N. Female circumcision as a public health issue. N Engl J Med. 1994 Sep 15;331(11):712–716. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199409153311106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Toubia N. Female genital mutilation and the responsibility of reproductive health professionals. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1994 Aug;46(2):127–135. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(94)90227-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.