Skip to main content
Sexually Transmitted Infections logoLink to Sexually Transmitted Infections
. 2003 Dec;79(6):487–490. doi: 10.1136/sti.79.6.487

Poor sensitivity and consistency of microscopy in the diagnosis of low grade non-gonococcal urethritis

R Smith 1, A Copas 1, M Prince 1, B George 1, A Walker 1, S Sadiq 1
PMCID: PMC1744776  PMID: 14663127

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the reliability of the diagnosis of non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU), and the variation between and within microscopists, from urethral smears at a large London genitourinary medicine clinic.

Methods: A senior microscopist (SM) preselected 60 Gram stained urethral smear slides, 20 negative (<5 polymorphs/hpf), 20 low grade NGU (5–20 p/hpf), and 20 high grade NGU (>20 p/hpf). Ten experienced microscopists, blinded to these initial grades, examined all slides giving each a polymorph score. After relabelling and randomly changing their order, the slides were re-examined by the same microscopists. Finally, the SM determined whether the study had resulted in loss of cells from any of the slides. The SM's initial grading and the consensus among microscopists provide two gold standards for analysis.

Results: Nine low grade and five high grade slides were removed from analysis because of loss of cells. By SM standard, considering microscopists' readings as simply non-NGU (<5 p/hpf) or NGU (⩾5 p/hpf), 97% from negative slides were correct (variation 93–100 across microscopists), 68% from low grade slides (45–95), and 94% from high grade slides (83–100). Consistency between repeat readings by the same microscopist was 96% for negatives, 75% for low grade and 89% for high grade slides. Results were similar by consensus standard.

Conclusions: There was considerable variation between and within microscopists in the diagnosis of NGU. Sensitivity was strongly related to grade of urethritis, with an appreciable proportion of low grade urethritis falsely diagnosed as negative. With increasing attendances for sexual health screening, a false positive rate of only 3% may lead to many false diagnoses.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (165.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arya O. P., Mallinson H., Andrews B. E., Sillis M. Diagnosis of urethritis: role of polymorphonuclear leukocyte counts in gram-stained urethral smears. Sex Transm Dis. 1984 Jan-Mar;11(1):10–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowie W. R. Comparison of Gram stain and first-voided urine sediment in the diagnosis of urethritis. Sex Transm Dis. 1978 Apr-Jun;5(2):39–42. doi: 10.1097/00007435-197804000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Desai K., Robson H. G. Comparison of the Gram-stained urethral smear and first-voided urine sediment in the diagnosis of nongonococcal urethritis. Sex Transm Dis. 1982 Jan-Mar;9(1):21–25. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198201000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Holmes K. K., Handsfield H. H., Wang S. P., Wentworth B. B., Turck M., Anderson J. B., Alexander E. R. Etiology of nongonococcal urethritis. N Engl J Med. 1975 Jun 5;292(23):1199–1205. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197506052922301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lamagni T. L., Hughes G., Rogers P. A., Paine T., Catchpole M. New cases seen at genitourinary medicine clinics: England 1998. Commun Dis Rep CDR Suppl. 1999 Dec;9(6):S1–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Landis S. J., Stewart I. O., Chernesky M. A., Mahony J. B., Cunningham A. I., Grenier-Landis M. N., Seidelman W. E. Value of the gram-stained urethral smear in the management of men with urethritis. Sex Transm Dis. 1988 Apr-Jun;15(2):78–84. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198804000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Swartz S. L., Kraus S. J., Herrmann K. L., Stargel M. D., Brown W. J., Allen S. D. Diagnosis and etiology of nongonococcal urethritis. J Infect Dis. 1978 Oct;138(4):445–454. doi: 10.1093/infdis/138.4.445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Taylor-Robinson D. The history of nongonococcal urethritis. Thomas Parran Award Lecture. Sex Transm Dis. 1996 Jan-Feb;23(1):86–91. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199601000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Terry P. M., Holland S., Olden D., O'Connell S. Diagnosing non-gonococcal urethritis: the gram-stained urethral smear in perspective. Int J STD AIDS. 1991 Jul-Aug;2(4):272–275. doi: 10.1177/095646249100200409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Willcox J. R., Adler M. W., Belsey E. M. Observer variation in the interpretation of Gram-stained urethral smears: implications for the diagnosis of non-specific urethritis. Br J Vener Dis. 1981 Apr;57(2):134–136. doi: 10.1136/sti.57.2.134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Sexually Transmitted Infections are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES