Skip to main content
PMC home page
Sexually Transmitted Infections logoLink to Sexually Transmitted Infections
. 2004 Oct;80(5):411–414. doi: 10.1136/sti.2003.008821

Dark ground microscopy and treponemal serological tests in the diagnosis of early syphilis

H Wheeler 1, S Agarwal 1, B Goh 1
PMCID: PMC1744899  PMID: 15459413

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the use of dark ground microscopy (DGM) and treponemal serological tests in the diagnosis of primary (PS) and secondary (SS) syphilis.

Methods: A retrospective case note review of patients with early syphilis who attended our department between January 2001 and December 2002. Data were collected on demographics, results of treponemal serology and DGM.

Results: 50 individuals had PS and 36 individuals had SS. DGM was performed in 31/50 (62%) of PS cases and this was positive in 97%. In 17 (34%) cases of PS, treponemal EIA was negative initially. DGM was performed on 13 of these, all of which were positive. Therefore, EIA had a sensitivity of 57% when compared to DGM. In 27 patients where EIA-IgM was performed, this was positive in 22 (81%), of which 12 were EIA negative on initial screening. All SS cases had positive EIA. DGM was performed in 19/36 (52%) of SS cases and was positive in 16/19—that is, a sensitivity of 84% when compared to EIA. The major reason why DGM was not performed in the cases of PS was that herpes was the presumed diagnosis and in SS the rash was attributed to other causes.

Conclusions: DGM is a rapid and sensitive test while EIA takes time for results and is less sensitive in PS. EIA-IgM is a useful adjunct in PS. DGM allows immediate diagnosis, treatment, and partner notification preventing further transmission. Genitourinary medicine clinics should have trained staff to perform DGM on all anogenital ulcers and suspected syphilitic lesions.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (56.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Centurion-Lara A., Castro C., Shaffer J. M., Van Voorhis W. C., Marra C. M., Lukehart S. A. Detection of Treponema pallidum by a sensitive reverse transcriptase PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Jun;35(6):1348–1352. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.6.1348-1352.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chapel T. A., Brown W. J., Jeffres C., Stewart J. A. How reliable is the morphological diagnosis of penile ulcerations? Sex Transm Dis. 1977 Oct-Dec;4(4):150–152. doi: 10.1097/00007435-197710000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cummings M. C., Lukehart S. A., Marra C., Smith B. L., Shaffer J., Demeo L. R., Castro C., McCormack W. M. Comparison of methods for the detection of treponema pallidum in lesions of early syphilis. Sex Transm Dis. 1996 Sep-Oct;23(5):366–369. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199609000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Daniels K. C., Ferneyhough H. S. Specific direct fluorescent antibody detection of Treponema pallidum. Health Lab Sci. 1977 Jul;14(3):164–171. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Doherty Lorraine, Fenton Kevin A., Jones Jane, Paine Thomas C., Higgins Stephen P., Williams Deborah, Palfreeman Adrian. Syphilis: old problem, new strategy. BMJ. 2002 Jul 20;325(7356):153–156. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7356.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Egglestone S. I., Turner A. J. Serological diagnosis of syphilis. PHLS Syphilis Serology Working Group. Commun Dis Public Health. 2000 Sep;3(3):158–162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lacey H. B., Higgins S. P., Graham D. An outbreak of early syphilis: cases from North Manchester General Hospital. Sex Transm Infect. 2001 Oct;77(5):311–313. doi: 10.1136/sti.77.5.311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Larsen S. A., Steiner B. M., Rudolph A. H. Laboratory diagnosis and interpretation of tests for syphilis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1995 Jan;8(1):1–21. doi: 10.1128/cmr.8.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Palmer H. M., Higgins S. P., Herring A. J., Kingston M. A. Use of PCR in the diagnosis of early syphilis in the United Kingdom. Sex Transm Infect. 2003 Dec;79(6):479–483. doi: 10.1136/sti.79.6.479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Romanowski B., Forsey E., Prasad E., Lukehart S., Tam M., Hook E. W., 3rd Detection of Treponema pallidum by a fluorescent monoclonal antibody test. Sex Transm Dis. 1987 Jul-Sep;14(3):156–159. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198707000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rompalo A. M., Lawlor J., Seaman P., Quinn T. C., Zenilman J. M., Hook E. W., 3rd Modification of syphilitic genital ulcer manifestations by coexistent HIV infection. Sex Transm Dis. 2001 Aug;28(8):448–454. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200108000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rufli T. Syphilis and HIV infection. Dermatologica. 1989;179(3):113–117. doi: 10.1159/000248335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Schmidt B. L., Edjlalipour M., Luger A. Comparative evaluation of nine different enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for determination of antibodies against Treponema pallidum in patients with primary syphilis. J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Mar;38(3):1279–1282. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.3.1279-1282.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Young H., Moyes A., Seagar L., McMillan A. Novel recombinant-antigen enzyme immunoassay for serological diagnosis of syphilis. J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Apr;36(4):913–917. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.4.913-917.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Sexually Transmitted Infections are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES