Abstract
Background: Audio computer assisted self interview (ACASI) may minimise social desirability bias in the ascertainment of sensitive behaviours. The aim of this study was to describe the difference in reporting risk behaviour in ACASI compared to a face to face interview (FFI) among public sexually transmitted diseases (STD) clinic attendees.
Study design: Randomly selected patients attending a public STD clinic in Baltimore, Maryland, sequentially took an ACASI formatted risk behaviour assessment followed by an FFI conducted by a single clinician, with both interview modalities surveying sexual and drug use behaviours. Binary responses were compared using the sign test, and categorical responses were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test to account for repeated measures.
Results: 671 (52% men, mean age 30 years, 95% African American) of 795 clinic attendees screened consented to participate. Subjects affirmed sensitive sexual behaviours such as same sex contact (p = 0.012), receptive rectal sexual exposure (p<0.001), orogenital contact (p<0.001), and a greater number of sex partners in the past month (p<0.001) more frequently with ACASI than with an FFI. However, there were no differences in participant responses to questions on use of illicit drugs or needle sharing.
Conclusions: Among STD clinic patients, reporting of sensitive sexual risk behaviours to clinicians was much more susceptible to social desirability bias than was reporting of illegal drug use behaviours. In STD clinics where screening of sexual risk is an essential component of STD prevention, the use of ACASI may be a more reliable assessment method than traditional FFI.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (61.7 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bangsberg David R., Bronstone Amy, Chesney Margaret A., Hecht Federick M. Computer-assisted self-interviewing (CASI) to improve provider assessment of adherence in routine clinical practice. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2002 Dec 15;31 (Suppl 3):S107–S111. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200212153-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Des Jarlais D. C., Paone D., Milliken J., Turner C. F., Miller H., Gribble J., Shi Q., Hagan H., Friedman S. R. Audio-computer interviewing to measure risk behaviour for HIV among injecting drug users: a quasi-randomised trial. Lancet. 1999 May 15;353(9165):1657–1661. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)07026-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gregson Simon, Zhuwau Tom, Ndlovu Joshua, Nyamukapa Constance A. Methods to reduce social desirability bias in sex surveys in low-development settings: experience in Zimbabwe. Sex Transm Dis. 2002 Oct;29(10):568–575. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200210000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gribble J. N., Miller H. G., Cooley P. C., Catania J. A., Pollack L., Turner C. F. The impact of T-ACASI interviewing on reported drug use among men who have sex with men. Subst Use Misuse. 2000 May-Jun;35(6-8):869–890. doi: 10.3109/10826080009148425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Macalino Grace E., Celentano David D., Latkin Carl, Strathdee Steffanie A., Vlahov David. Risk behaviors by audio computer-assisted self-interviews among HIV-seropositive and HIV-seronegative injection drug users. AIDS Educ Prev. 2002 Oct;14(5):367–378. doi: 10.1521/aeap.14.6.367.24075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Metzger D. S., Koblin B., Turner C., Navaline H., Valenti F., Holte S., Gross M., Sheon A., Miller H., Cooley P. Randomized controlled trial of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing: utility and acceptability in longitudinal studies. HIVNET Vaccine Preparedness Study Protocol Team. Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Jul 15;152(2):99–106. doi: 10.1093/aje/152.2.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murphy D. A., Durako S., Muenz L. R., Wilson C. M. Marijuana use among HIV-positive and high-risk adolescents: a comparison of self-report through audio computer-assisted self-administered interviewing and urinalysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Nov 1;152(9):805–813. doi: 10.1093/aje/152.9.805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Newman Jessica Clark, Des Jarlais Don C., Turner Charles F., Gribble Jay, Cooley Phillip, Paone Denise. The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes. Am J Public Health. 2002 Feb;92(2):294–297. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.2.294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ROSENTHAL R., PERSINGER G. W., FODE K. L. Experimenter bias, anxiety, and social desirability. Percept Mot Skills. 1962 Aug;15:73–74. doi: 10.2466/pms.1962.15.1.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turner C. F., Ku L., Rogers S. M., Lindberg L. D., Pleck J. H., Sonenstein F. L. Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science. 1998 May 8;280(5365):867–873. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5365.867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams M. L., Freeman R. C., Bowen A. M., Zhao Z., Elwood W. N., Gordon C., Young P., Rusek R., Signes C. A. A comparison of the reliability of self-reported drug use and sexual behaviors using computer-assisted versus face-to-face interviewing. AIDS Educ Prev. 2000 Jun;12(3):199–213. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Griensven F., Supawitkul S., Kilmarx P. H., Limpakarnjanarat K., Young N. L., Manopaiboon C., Mock P. A., Korattana S., Mastro T. D. Rapid assessment of sexual behavior, drug use, human immunodeficiency virus, and sexually transmitted diseases in northern thai youth using audio-computer-assisted self-interviewing and noninvasive specimen collection. Pediatrics. 2001 Jul;108(1):E13–E13. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.1.e13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]