Skip to main content
PMC home page
Sexually Transmitted Infections logoLink to Sexually Transmitted Infections
. 2005 Oct;81(5):408–414. doi: 10.1136/sti.2004.012047

Acceptability of human papillomavirus self testing in female adolescents

J Kahn 1, D Bernstein 1, S Rosenthal 1, B Huang 1, L Kollar 1, J Colyer 1, A Tissot 1, P Hillard 1, D Witte 1, P Groen 1, G Slap 1
PMCID: PMC1745047  PMID: 16199741

Abstract

Objectives: To develop scales assessing acceptability of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in adolescents, to compare acceptability of self to clinician testing, and to identify adolescent characteristics associated with acceptability.

Methods: Female adolescents 14–21 years of age attending a hospital based teen health centre self collected vaginal samples and a clinician, using a speculum, collected cervicovaginal samples for HPV DNA. Acceptability of and preferences for self and clinician testing were assessed at baseline and 2 week visits.

Results: The mean age of the 121 participants was 17.8 years and 82% were black. The acceptability scales demonstrated good internal consistency, reliability, test-retest reliability, and factorial validity. Scores were significantly lower for self testing than clinician testing on the acceptability scale and three subscales measuring trust of the test result, confidence in one's ability to collect a specimen, and perceived effects of testing (p<0.01). Of those who reported a preference, 73% preferred clinician to self testing. Acceptability scores for both self and clinician testing increased significantly pre-examination to post-examination (p<0.01). Multivariable analyses demonstrated that race was independently associated with pre-examination and post-examination acceptability of self testing, and that sexual behaviours and gynaecological experiences were associated with specific acceptability subscales.

Conclusions: This sample of adolescents found clinician testing for HPV to be more acceptable than self testing and preferred clinician to self testing. If self testing for HPV is offered in the future, clinicians should not assume that adolescent patients will prefer self testing. Instead, they should educate adolescents about available testing options and discuss any concerns regarding self collection technique or accuracy of test results.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (97.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ASCUS-LSIL Traige Study (ALTS) Group Results of a randomized trial on the management of cytology interpretations of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jun;188(6):1383–1392. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barroso J., McMillan S., Casey L., Gibson W., Kaminski G., Meyer J. Comparison between African-American and white women in their beliefs about breast cancer and their health locus of control. Cancer Nurs. 2000 Aug;23(4):268–276. doi: 10.1097/00002820-200008000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blake D. R., Duggan A., Quinn T., Zenilman J., Joffe A. Evaluation of vaginal infections in adolescent women: can it be done without a speculum? Pediatrics. 1998 Oct;102(4 Pt 1):939–944. doi: 10.1542/peds.102.4.939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cox J. T. Evaluating the role of HPV testing for women with equivocal Papanicolaou test findings. JAMA. 1999 May 5;281(17):1645–1647. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.17.1645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dannecker C., Siebert U., Thaler C. J., Kiermeir D., Hepp H., Hillemanns P. Primary cervical cancer screening by self-sampling of human papillomavirus DNA in internal medicine outpatient clinics. Ann Oncol. 2004 Jun;15(6):863–869. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdh240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dzuba Ilana G., Díaz Elsa Yunes, Allen Betania, Leonard Yvonne Flores, Lazcano Ponce Eduardo C., Shah Keerti V., Bishai David, Lorincz Attila, Ferris Daron, Turnbull Bernardo. The acceptability of self-collected samples for HPV testing vs. the pap test as alternatives in cervical cancer screening. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2002 Apr;11(3):265–275. doi: 10.1089/152460902753668466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Forrest S., McCaffery K., Waller J., Desai M., Szarewski A., Cadman L., Wardle J. Attitudes to self-sampling for HPV among Indian, Pakistani, African-Caribbean and white British women in Manchester, UK. J Med Screen. 2004;11(2):85–88. doi: 10.1258/096914104774061065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Harper Diane M., Noll Walter W., Belloni Dorothy R., Cole Bernard F. Randomized clinical trial of PCR-determined human papillomavirus detection methods: self-sampling versus clinician-directed--biologic concordance and women's preferences. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar;186(3):365–373. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.121076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hillemanns P., Kimmig R., Hüttemann U., Dannecker C., Thaler C. J. Screening for cervical neoplasia by self-assessment for human papillomavirus DNA. Lancet. 1999 Dec 4;354(9194):1970–1970. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04110-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ho G. Y., Bierman R., Beardsley L., Chang C. J., Burk R. D. Natural history of cervicovaginal papillomavirus infection in young women. N Engl J Med. 1998 Feb 12;338(7):423–428. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199802123380703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Holland-Hall C. M., Wiesenfeld H. C., Murray P. J. Self-collected vaginal swabs for the detection of multiple sexually transmitted infections in adolescent girls. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2002 Dec;15(5):307–313. doi: 10.1016/s1083-3188(02)00197-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hsieh Y-H, Howell M. R., Gaydos J. C., McKee K. T., Jr, Quinn T. C., Gaydos C. A. Preference among female Army recruits for use of self-administrated vaginal swabs or urine to screen for Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections. Sex Transm Dis. 2003 Oct;30(10):769–773. doi: 10.1097/01.OLQ.0000079048.11771.46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hughes C., Lerman C., Lustbader E. Ethnic differences in risk perception among women at increased risk for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996;40(1):25–35. doi: 10.1007/BF01806000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kahn Jessica A., Goodman Elizabeth, Huang Bin, Slap Gail B., Emans S. Jean. Predictors of Papanicolaou smear return in a hospital-based adolescent and young adult clinic. Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Mar;101(3):490–499. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02592-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kahn Jessica A., Rosenthal Susan L., Hamann Tara, Bernstein David I. Attitudes about human papillomavirus vaccine in young women. Int J STD AIDS. 2003 May;14(5):300–306. doi: 10.1258/095646203321605486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kahn Jessica A., Slap Gail B., Huang Bin, Rosenthal Susan L., Wanchick Abbigail M., Kollar Linda M., Hillard Paula A., Witte David, Groen Pam, Bernstein David I. Comparison of adolescent and young adult self-collected and clinician-collected samples for human papillomavirus. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 May;103(5 Pt 1):952–959. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000124569.61462.8d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim Jane J., Wright Thomas C., Goldie Sue J. Cost-effectiveness of alternative triage strategies for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. JAMA. 2002 May 8;287(18):2382–2390. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.18.2382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kulasingam Shalini L., Hughes James P., Kiviat Nancy B., Mao Constance, Weiss Noel S., Kuypers Jane M., Koutsky Laura A. Evaluation of human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for cervical abnormalities: comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and frequency of referral. JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1749–1757. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Manos M. M., Kinney W. K., Hurley L. B., Sherman M. E., Shieh-Ngai J., Kurman R. J., Ransley J. E., Fetterman B. J., Hartinger J. S., McIntosh K. M. Identifying women with cervical neoplasia: using human papillomavirus DNA testing for equivocal Papanicolaou results. JAMA. 1999 May 5;281(17):1605–1610. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.17.1605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mays R. M., Zimet G. D., Winston Y., Kee R., Dickes J., Su L. Human papillomavirus, genital warts, Pap smears, and cervical cancer: knowledge and beliefs of adolescent and adult women. Health Care Women Int. 2000 Jul-Aug;21(5):361–374. doi: 10.1080/07399330050082218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Moscicki A. B., Shiboski S., Broering J., Powell K., Clayton L., Jay N., Darragh T. M., Brescia R., Kanowitz S., Miller S. B. The natural history of human papillomavirus infection as measured by repeated DNA testing in adolescent and young women. J Pediatr. 1998 Feb;132(2):277–284. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(98)70445-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nanda K., McCrory D. C., Myers E. R., Bastian L. A., Hasselblad V., Hickey J. D., Matchar D. B. Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2000 May 16;132(10):810–819. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-132-10-200005160-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nobbenhuis M. A., Walboomers J. M., Helmerhorst T. J., Rozendaal L., Remmink A. J., Risse E. K., van der Linden H. C., Voorhorst F. J., Kenemans P., Meijer C. J. Relation of human papillomavirus status to cervical lesions and consequences for cervical-cancer screening: a prospective study. Lancet. 1999 Jul 3;354(9172):20–25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)12490-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Paskett E. D., Rushing J., D'Agostino R., Jr, Tatum C., Velez R. Cancer screening behaviors of low-income women: the impact of race. Womens Health. 1997 Fall-Winter;3(3-4):203–226. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Richardson Elizabeth, Sellors John W., Mackinnon Sharon, Woodcox Vicki, Howard Michelle, Jang Dan, Karwalajtys Tina, Chernesky Max A. Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infections and specimen collection preference among women, using self-collected vaginal swabs in community settings. Sex Transm Dis. 2003 Dec;30(12):880–885. doi: 10.1097/01.OLQ.0000091142.68884.2A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68–78. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sellors J. W., Lorincz A. T., Mahony J. B., Mielzynska I., Lytwyn A., Roth P., Howard M., Chong S., Daya D., Chapman W. Comparison of self-collected vaginal, vulvar and urine samples with physician-collected cervical samples for human papillomavirus testing to detect high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. CMAJ. 2000 Sep 5;163(5):513–518. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Serlin Michelle, Shafer Mary-Ann, Tebb Kathleen, Gyamfi Afua-Adoma, Moncada Jeanne, Schachter Julius, Wibbelsman Charles. What sexually transmitted disease screening method does the adolescent prefer? Adolescents' attitudes toward first-void urine, self-collected vaginal swab, and pelvic examination. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002 Jun;156(6):588–591. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.156.6.588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Shafer M. A. Annual pelvic examination in the sexually active adolescent female: what are we doing and why are we doing it? J Adolesc Health. 1998 Aug;23(2):68–73. doi: 10.1016/s1054-139x(98)00066-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Shafer M. A. With urine-based screening, do sexually active adolescent girls still need annual pelvic examinations? No: recommending annual exams is not evidence based. West J Med. 2000 Nov;173(5):293–293. doi: 10.1136/ewjm.173.5.293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Smith K., Harrington K., Wingood G., Oh M. K., Hook E. W., 3rd, DiClemente R. J. Self-obtained vaginal swabs for diagnosis of treatable sexually transmitted diseases in adolescent girls. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001 Jun;155(6):676–679. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.155.6.676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Walboomers J. M., Jacobs M. V., Manos M. M., Bosch F. X., Kummer J. A., Shah K. V., Snijders P. J., Peto J., Meijer C. J., Muñoz N. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol. 1999 Sep;189(1):12–19. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199909)189:1<12::AID-PATH431>3.0.CO;2-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wiesenfeld H. C., Lowry D. L., Heine R. P., Krohn M. A., Bittner H., Kellinger K., Shultz M., Sweet R. L. Self-collection of vaginal swabs for the detection of Chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomoniasis: opportunity to encourage sexually transmitted disease testing among adolescents. Sex Transm Dis. 2001 Jun;28(6):321–325. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200106000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Williams G. C., Cox E. M., Kouides R., Deci E. L. Presenting the facts about smoking to adolescents: effects of an autonomy-supportive style. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 Sep;153(9):959–964. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.153.9.959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wright Thomas C., Jr, Cox J. Thomas, Massad L. Stewart, Carlson Jay, Twiggs Leo B., Wilkinson Edward J., American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology 2001 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):295–304. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wright Thomas C., Jr, Cox J. Thomas, Massad L. Stewart, Twiggs Leo B., Wilkinson Edward J., ASCCP-Sponsored Consensus Conference 2001 Consensus Guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities. JAMA. 2002 Apr 24;287(16):2120–2129. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.16.2120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Sexually Transmitted Infections are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES