Skip to main content
Thorax logoLink to Thorax
. 1999 Sep;54(9):765–770. doi: 10.1136/thx.54.9.765

Effect of brachial plexus co-activation on phrenic nerve conduction time

Y Luo 1, M Polkey 1, R Lyall 1, J Moxham 1
PMCID: PMC1745563  PMID: 10456968

Abstract

BACKGROUND—Diaphragm function can be assessed by electromyography of the diaphragm during electrical phrenic nerve stimulation (ES). Whether phrenic nerve conduction time (PNCT) and diaphragm electrical activity can be reliably measured from chest wall electrodes with ES is uncertain.
METHODS—The diaphragm compound muscle action potential (CMAP) was recorded using an oesophageal electrode and lower chest wall electrodes during ES in six normal subjects. Two patients with bilateral diaphragm paralysis were also studied. Stimulations were deliberately given in a manner designed to avoid or incur co-activation of the brachial plexus.
RESULTS—For the oesophageal electrode the PNCT was similar with both stimulation techniques with mean (SE) values of 7.1 (0.2) and 6.8 (0.2) ms, respectively (pooled left and right values). However, for surface electrodes the PNCT was substantially shorter when the brachial plexus was activated (4.4 (0.1) ms) than when it was not (7.4 (0.2) ms) (mean difference 3.0 ms, 95% CI 2.7 to 3.4, p<0.0001). A small short latency CMAP was recorded from the lower chest wall electrodes during stimulation of the brachial plexus alone.
CONCLUSIONS—The results of this study show that lower chest wall electrodes only accurately measure PNCT when care is taken to avoid stimulating the brachial plexus. A false positive CMAP response to phrenic stimulation could be caused by inadvertent stimulation of the brachial plexus. This finding may further explain why the diaphragm CMAP recorded from chest wall electrodes can be unreliable with cervical magnetic stimulation during which brachial plexus activation occurs.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (106.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Attali V., Mehiri S., Straus C., Salachas F., Arnulf I., Meininger V., Derenne J. P., Similowski T. Influence of neck muscles on mouth pressure response to cervical magnetic stimulation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Aug;156(2 Pt 1):509–514. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.156.2.9612053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beck J., Sinderby C., Lindström L., Grassino A. Diaphragm interference pattern EMG and compound muscle action potentials: effects of chest wall configuration. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1997 Feb;82(2):520–530. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1997.82.2.520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bellemare F., Bigland-Ritchie B. Assessment of human diaphragm strength and activation using phrenic nerve stimulation. Respir Physiol. 1984 Dec;58(3):263–277. doi: 10.1016/0034-5687(84)90003-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bolton C. F. AAEM minimonograph #40: clinical neurophysiology of the respiratory system. Muscle Nerve. 1993 Aug;16(8):809–818. doi: 10.1002/mus.880160802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen R., Collins S., Remtulla H., Parkes A., Bolton C. F. Phrenic nerve conduction study in normal subjects. Muscle Nerve. 1995 Mar;18(3):330–335. doi: 10.1002/mus.880180311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chokoverty S., Shah S., Chokroverty M., Deutsch A., Belsh J. Percutaneous magnetic coil stimulation of the phrenic nerve roots and trunk. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995 Dec;97(6):369–374. doi: 10.1016/0924-980x(95)00159-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Davis J. N. Phrenic nerve conduction in man. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1967 Oct;30(5):420–426. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.30.5.420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Estenne M., Yernault J. C., De Smet J. M., De Troyer A. Phrenic and diaphragm function after coronary artery bypass grafting. Thorax. 1985 Apr;40(4):293–299. doi: 10.1136/thx.40.4.293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Laghi F., Harrison M. J., Tobin M. J. Comparison of magnetic and electrical phrenic nerve stimulation in assessment of diaphragmatic contractility. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1996 May;80(5):1731–1742. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1996.80.5.1731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Laghi F., Jubran A., Topeli A., Fahey P. J., Garrity E. R., Jr, Arcidi J. M., de Pinto D. J., Edwards L. C., Tobin M. J. Effect of lung volume reduction surgery on neuromechanical coupling of the diaphragm. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Feb;157(2):475–483. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.2.9705082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Laroche C. M., Carroll N., Moxham J., Green M. Clinical significance of severe isolated diaphragm weakness. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988 Oct;138(4):862–866. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/138.4.862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Luo Y. M., Johnson L. C., Polkey M. I., Harris M. L., Lyall R. A., Green M., Moxham J. Diaphragm electromyogram measured with unilateral magnetic stimulation. Eur Respir J. 1999 Feb;13(2):385–390. doi: 10.1183/09031936.99.13238599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Luo Y. M., Polkey M. I., Johnson L. C., Lyall R. A., Harris M. L., Green M., Moxham J. Diaphragm EMG measured by cervical magnetic and electrical phrenic nerve stimulation. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1998 Dec;85(6):2089–2099. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1998.85.6.2089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. MacLean I. C., Mattioni T. A. Phrenic nerve conduction studies: a new technique and its application in quadriplegic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1981 Feb;62(2):70–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mador M. J., Rodis A., Magalang U. J., Ameen K. Comparison of cervical magnetic and transcutaneous phrenic nerve stimulation before and after threshold loading. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996 Aug;154(2 Pt 1):448–453. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.154.2.8756821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Markand O. N., Kincaid J. C., Pourmand R. A., Moorthy S. S., King R. D., Mahomed Y., Brown J. W. Electrophysiologic evaluation of diaphragm by transcutaneous phrenic nerve stimulation. Neurology. 1984 May;34(5):604–614. doi: 10.1212/wnl.34.5.604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McKenzie D. K., Gandevia S. C. Phrenic nerve conduction times and twitch pressures of the human diaphragm. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1985 May;58(5):1496–1504. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1985.58.5.1496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mier A., Brophy C., Moxham J., Green M. Phrenic nerve stimulation in normal subjects and in patients with diaphragmatic weakness. Thorax. 1987 Nov;42(11):885–888. doi: 10.1136/thx.42.11.885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mills G. H., Kyroussis D., Hamnegard C. H., Polkey M. I., Green M., Moxham J. Bilateral magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerves from an anterolateral approach. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996 Oct;154(4 Pt 1):1099–1105. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.154.4.8887614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Similowski T., Duguet A., Straus C., Attali V., Boisteanu D., Derenne J. P. Assessment of the voluntary activation of the diaphragm using cervical and cortical magnetic stimulation. Eur Respir J. 1996 Jun;9(6):1224–1231. doi: 10.1183/09031936.96.09061224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Similowski T., Fleury B., Launois S., Cathala H. P., Bouche P., Derenne J. P. Cervical magnetic stimulation: a new painless method for bilateral phrenic nerve stimulation in conscious humans. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1989 Oct;67(4):1311–1318. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1989.67.4.1311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Similowski T., Mehiri S., Duguet A., Attali V., Straus C., Derenne J. P. Comparison of magnetic and electrical phrenic nerve stimulation in assessment of phrenic nerve conduction time. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1997 Apr;82(4):1190–1199. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1997.82.4.1190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Swenson M. R., Rubenstein R. S. Phrenic nerve conduction studies. Muscle Nerve. 1992 May;15(5):597–603. doi: 10.1002/mus.880150511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wragg S., Aquilina R., Moran J., Ridding M., Hamnegard C., Fearn T., Green M., Moxham J. Comparison of cervical magnetic stimulation and bilateral percutaneous electrical stimulation of the phrenic nerves in normal subjects. Eur Respir J. 1994 Oct;7(10):1788–1792. doi: 10.1183/09031936.94.07101788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Thorax are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES