Abstract
BACKGROUND—BCG vaccination using the multipuncture device (the Heaf gun) is recommended in the UK for infants and very small children only. The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of conversion of the tuberculin test, the safety and acceptability of BCG vaccination using the multipuncture device and to compare it with the conventional intradermal method in schoolchildren. METHODS—Schoolchildren attending schools in Tower Hamlets who were eligible for BCG vaccination were tuberculin tested using the Heaf gun. Those with grade 0-1 reaction were randomised to receive BCG vaccination using either the multipuncture or the intradermal method. The site of BCG vaccination was inspected after eight weeks for inflammatory changes and scarring. A questionnaire about pain and inflammation at the site of vaccination was completed. The Heaf test was repeated at eight weeks and its results were assessed by an examiner unaware of the results of the previous Heaf test and the method of BCG administration. The Heaf test conversion was deemed to have occurred if there was a change of at least one grade in the response. RESULTS—One hundred and sixty nine children (83 girls) of mean age 11.8 years completed the study, of which 81 received BCG by the multipuncture method. The Heaf test did not convert in 22 of 81(27.2%) receiving BCG by the multipuncture device compared with six of 88 (6.8%) who received the vaccine by the intradermal method (odds ratio 0.2, 95% confidence interval 0.07 to 0.55). The BCG scar was visible in all children who had intradermal BCG compared with 67 of 81 (81.8%) of the multipuncture group. The multipuncture method was less painful and caused fewer inflammatory changes than the intradermal method. CONCLUSIONS—In schoolchildren the multi- puncture device for administering BCG caused a lower rate of tuberculin conversion as measured by the Heaf test and less of an inflammatory response than the intradermal method. The method needs to be modified before it is applied on a wider scale to schoolchildren.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (64.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Colditz G. A., Brewer T. F., Berkey C. S., Wilson M. E., Burdick E., Fineberg H. V., Mosteller F. Efficacy of BCG vaccine in the prevention of tuberculosis. Meta-analysis of the published literature. JAMA. 1994 Mar 2;271(9):698–702. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cundall D. B., Ashelford D. J., Pearson S. B. BCG immunisation of infants by percutaneous multiple puncture. BMJ. 1988 Nov 5;297(6657):1173–1174. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6657.1173-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- GRIFFITH A. H., KINSLEY B. J., ANDERSON D. J. A COMPARISON BETWEEN MULTIPLE PUNCTURE AND INTRADERMAL METHODS OF BCG VACCINATION. Tubercle. 1963 Sep;44:372–377. doi: 10.1016/s0041-3879(63)80108-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- GRIFFITHS M. I., BRINDLE T. W., GORDON E. H., HOLME T., JONES B. Multiple-puncture vaccination with freeze-dried B.C.G. vaccine in schoolchildren. Br Med J. 1961 Feb 25;1(5225):536–540. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5225.536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Packe G. E., Innes J. A. Protective effect of BCG vaccination in infant Asians: a case-control study. Arch Dis Child. 1988 Mar;63(3):277–281. doi: 10.1136/adc.63.3.277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Springett V. H., Darbyshire J. H., Nunn A. J., Sutherland I. Changes in tuberculosis notification rates in the white ethnic group in England and Wales between 1953 and 1983. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1988 Dec;42(4):370–376. doi: 10.1136/jech.42.4.370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sutherland I., Springett V. H. The effects of the scheme for BCG vaccination of schoolchildren in England and Wales and the consequences of discontinuing the scheme at various dates. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1989 Mar;43(1):15–24. doi: 10.1136/jech.43.1.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]