Skip to main content
PMC home page
Thorax logoLink to Thorax
. 2001 Sep;56(9):691–695. doi: 10.1136/thorax.56.9.691

Reference values of interrupter respiratory resistance in healthy preschool white children

E Lombardi 1, P Sly 1, G Concutelli 1, E Novembre 1, G Veneruso 1, G Frongia 1, R Bernardini 1, A Vierucci 1
PMCID: PMC1746135  PMID: 11514689

Abstract

BACKGROUND—Interrupter respiratory resistance (Rint) is reported to be useful in evaluating lung function in poorly collaborating patients. However, no reference values are available from large samples of preschool children using the standard interrupter method. The aim of this study was to define reference Rint values in a population of healthy preschool children.
METHODS—Rint was assessed without supporting the cheeks in children with no history of wheeze from six kindergartens. To evaluate the effects of upper airway compliance on Rint in healthy children, an additional group of preschool children with either no history of wheeze or no respiratory symptoms at the time of testing underwent Rint measurements in our lung function laboratory with and without supporting the cheeks. Short term (about 1 minute apart) and long term (mean 2.5 months apart) repeatability of Rint measurements (2 SDs of the mean paired difference between measurements) was also assessed in children referred for cough or wheeze.
RESULTS—A total of 284 healthy white children (age range 3.0-6.4 years) were evaluated. Mean inspiratory and expiratory Rint (RintI and RintE) did not differ significantly in boys and girls. Age, height, and weight showed a significant inverse correlation with both RintI and RintE in the univariate analysis with linear regression. Multiple regression with age, height, and weight as the independent variables showed that all three variables were significantly and independently correlated with RintI, whereas only height was significantly and independently correlated with RintE. Supporting the cheeks had no significant effect on RintI (n=29, median 0.673 v 0.660 kPa/l.s, p=0.098) or RintE (n=39, median 0.702 v 0.713 kPa/l.s, p=0.126). Short term repeatability was 0.202 kPa/l.s for RintI (n=50) and 0.242 kPa/l.s for RintE (n=69). Long term repeatability was 0.208 kPa/l.s for RintE (n=26).
CONCLUSIONS—We have reported reference Rint values in preschool white children and have demonstrated the usefulness of this technique in assessing lung function in this age group.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (174.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bates J. H., Hunter I. W., Sly P. D., Okubo S., Filiatrault S., Milic-Emili J. Effect of valve closure time on the determination of respiratory resistance by flow interruption. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1987 Mar;25(2):136–140. doi: 10.1007/BF02442841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bates J. H., Sly P. D., Kochi T., Martin J. G. The effect of a proximal compliance on interrupter measurements of resistance. Respir Physiol. 1987 Dec;70(3):301–312. doi: 10.1016/0034-5687(87)90012-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bates J. H., Sly P. D., Okubo S. General method for describing and extrapolating monotonic transients and its application to respiratory mechanics. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1987 Mar;25(2):131–135. doi: 10.1007/BF02442840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet. 1995 Oct 21;346(8982):1085–1087. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91748-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bridge P. D., Lee H., Silverman M. A portable device based on the interrupter technique to measure bronchodilator response in schoolchildren. Eur Respir J. 1996 Jul;9(7):1368–1373. doi: 10.1183/09031936.96.09071368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bridge P. D., Ranganathan S., McKenzie S. A. Measurement of airway resistance using the interrupter technique in preschool children in the ambulatory setting. Eur Respir J. 1999 Apr;13(4):792–796. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.13d16.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Carter E. R., Stecenko A. A., Pollock B. H., Jaeger M. J. Evaluation of the interrupter technique for the use of assessing airway obstruction in children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1994 Apr;17(4):211–217. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950170402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chowienczyk P. J., Lawson C. P., Lane S., Johnson R., Wilson N., Silverman M., Cochrane G. M. A flow interruption device for measurement of airway resistance. Eur Respir J. 1991 May;4(5):623–628. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jackson A. C., Milhorn H. T., Jr, Norman J. R. A reevaluation of the interrupter technique for airway resistance measurement. J Appl Physiol. 1974 Feb;36(2):264–268. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1974.36.2.264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Klug B., Bisgaard H. Specific airway resistance, interrupter resistance, and respiratory impedance in healthy children aged 2-7 years. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1998 May;25(5):322–331. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0496(199805)25:5<322::aid-ppul6>3.0.co;2-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Oswald-Mammosser M., Llerena C., Speich J. P., Donata L., Lonsdorfer Measurements of respiratory system resistance by the interrupter technique in healthy and asthmatic children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1997 Aug;24(2):78–85. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0496(199708)24:2<78::aid-ppul2>3.0.co;2-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Phagoo S. B., Watson R. A., Pride N. B., Silverman M. Accuracy and sensitivity of the interrupter technique for measuring the response to bronchial challenge in normal subjects. Eur Respir J. 1993 Jul;6(7):996–1003. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Phagoo S. B., Wilson N. M., Silverman M. Evaluation of a new interrupter device for measuring bronchial responsiveness and the response to bronchodilator in 3 year old children. Eur Respir J. 1996 Jul;9(7):1374–1380. doi: 10.1183/09031936.96.09071374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Phagoo S. B., Wilson N. M., Silverman M. Evaluation of the interrupter technique for measuring change in airway resistance in 5-year-old asthmatic children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1995 Dec;20(6):387–395. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950200609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sly P. D., Bates J. H., Milic-Emili J. Measurement of respiratory mechanics using the Siemens Servo Ventilator 900C. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1987 Nov-Dec;3(6):400–405. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950030605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Studnicka M., Frischer T., Neumann M. Determinants of reproducibility of lung function tests in children aged 7 to 10 years. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1998 Apr;25(4):238–243. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0496(199804)25:4<238::aid-ppul4>3.0.co;2-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Vooren P. H., van Zomeren B. C. Reference values of total respiratory resistance, determined with the "opening" interruption technique. Eur Respir J. 1989 Nov;2(10):966–971. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. van Altena R., Gimeno F. Respiratory resistance measured by flow-interruption in a normal population. Respiration. 1994;61(5):249–254. doi: 10.1159/000196347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Thorax are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES