Abstract
Background: A study was undertaken to investigate the preferences of patients with asthma for attributes or characteristics associated with treatment for their asthma and to investigate the extent to which such preferences may differ between patient subgroups.
Methods: The economic technique of conjoint analysis (CA) was used to investigate patients' strength of preference for several key attributes associated with services for the treatment of asthma. A CA questionnaire was administered to two groups of asthma outpatients aged 18 years or older, 150 receiving conventional treatment at Whipps Cross Hospital (WC) and 150 receiving homeopathic treatment at the Royal London Homoeopathic Hospital (RL).
Results: An overall response rate of 47% (n=142) was achieved. Statistically significant attributes in influencing preferences for both the WC and RL respondents were (1) the extent to which the doctor gave sufficient time to listen to what the patient has to say, (2) the extent to which the treatment seemed to relieve symptoms, and (3) the travel costs of attending for an asthma consultation. The extent to which the doctor treated the patient as a whole person was also a statistically significant attribute for the RL respondents.
Conclusions: This study has shown that aspects associated with the process of delivery of asthma services are important to patients in addition to treatment outcomes. The homeopathic respondents expressed stronger preferences for the doctor to treat them as a whole person than the patients receiving conventional treatment. Overall, the preferences for the attributes included in the study were similar for both groups.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (115.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Apter A. J., Reisine S. T., Affleck G., Barrows E., ZuWallack R. L. Adherence with twice-daily dosing of inhaled steroids. Socioeconomic and health-belief differences. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Jun;157(6 Pt 1):1810–1817. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.6.9712007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bryan S., Buxton M., Sheldon R., Grant A. Magnetic resonance imaging for the investigation of knee injuries: an investigation of preferences. Health Econ. 1998 Nov;7(7):595–603. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(1998110)7:7<595::aid-hec381>3.0.co;2-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Korsch B. M., Negrete V. F. Doctor-patient communication. Sci Am. 1972 Aug;227(2):66–74. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0872-66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osman L. M., McKenzie L., Cairns J., Friend J. A., Godden D. J., Legge J. S., Douglas J. G. Patient weighting of importance of asthma symptoms. Thorax. 2001 Feb;56(2):138–142. doi: 10.1136/thorax.56.2.138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ratcliffe J., Buxton M. Patients' preferences regarding the process and outcomes of life-saving technology. An application of conjoint analysis to liver transplantation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999 Spring;15(2):340–351. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reilly D., Taylor M. A., Beattie N. G., Campbell J. H., McSharry C., Aitchison T. C., Carter R., Stevenson R. D. Is evidence for homoeopathy reproducible? Lancet. 1994 Dec 10;344(8937):1601–1606. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90407-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ryan M., Farrar S. Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. BMJ. 2000 Jun 3;320(7248):1530–1533. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ryan M., Hughes J. Using conjoint analysis to assess women's preferences for miscarriage management. Health Econ. 1997 May-Jun;6(3):261–273. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199705)6:3<261::aid-hec262>3.0.co;2-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ryan M., McIntosh E., Dean T., Old P. Trade-offs between location and waiting times in the provision of health care: the case of elective surgery on the Isle of Wight. J Public Health Med. 2000 Jun;22(2):202–210. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/22.2.202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ryan M. Using conjoint analysis to take account of patient preferences and go beyond health outcomes: an application to in vitro fertilisation. Soc Sci Med. 1999 Feb;48(4):535–546. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00374-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van der Pol M., Cairns J. Establishing patient preferences for blood transfusion support: an application of conjoint analysis. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1998 Apr;3(2):70–76. doi: 10.1177/135581969800300203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]