Skip to main content
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2001 Jun;10(2):108–116. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.2.108

Effect of policies directed at youth access to smoking: results from the SimSmoke computer simulation model

D Levy 1, K Friend 1, H Holder 1, M Carmona 1
PMCID: PMC1747539  PMID: 11387530

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—To develop a simulation model to predict the effects of youth access policies on retail compliance, smoking rates, and smoking attributable deaths.
METHODS—A model of youth access policies is developed based on empirical research and a theory of perceived risk. The model incorporates substitution into other sources as retail sales are restricted, and is used to project the number of smokers and smoking related deaths. Various policies to limit youth access to cigarettes are evaluated, and we explore how efficient policies may be developed.
RESULTS—The model predicts that a well designed and comprehensive policy that includes sufficient compliance checks, penalties, and community involvement has the potential to reduce the number of young smokers. Because smoking related deaths occur later in life, the effects on health are largely delayed.
CONCLUSIONS—A well designed youth access policy has the ability to affect youth smoking rates in the short term, and will lead to savings in lives in future years. The ability of retail oriented policies to reduce youth smoking, however, is limited. Other tobacco control policies, including those directed at non-retail sources of cigarettes, are also needed.


Keywords: control policy; youth access policy; simulation model

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (192.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altman D. G., Wheelis A. Y., McFarlane M., Lee H., Fortmann S. P. The relationship between tobacco access and use among adolescents: a four community study. Soc Sci Med. 1999 Mar;48(6):759–775. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00332-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Emery S., Gilpin E. A., White M. M., Pierce J. P. How adolescents get their cigarettes: implications for policies on access and price. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 Jan 20;91(2):184–186. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.2.184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Forster J. L., Murray D. M., Wolfson M., Blaine T. M., Wagenaar A. C., Hennrikus D. J. The effects of community policies to reduce youth access to tobacco. Am J Public Health. 1998 Aug;88(8):1193–1198. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.8.1193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Forster J. L., Wolfson M. Youth access to tobacco: policies and politics. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:203–235. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gilpin E. A., Pierce J. P., Farkas A. J. Duration of smoking abstinence and success in quitting. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 Apr 16;89(8):572–576. doi: 10.1093/jnci/89.8.572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hinds M. W. Impact of a local ordinance banning tobacco sales to minors. Public Health Rep. 1992 May-Jun;107(3):355–358. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jason L. A., Billows W. D., Schnopp-Wyatt D. L., King C. Long-term findings from Woodridge in reducing illegal cigarette sales to older minors. Eval Health Prof. 1996 Mar;19(1):3–13. doi: 10.1177/016327879601900101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jason L. A., Ji P. Y., Anes M. D., Birkhead S. H. Active enforcement of cigarette control laws in the prevention of cigarette sales to minors. JAMA. 1991 Dec 11;266(22):3159–3161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jason L., Billows W., Schnopp-Wyatt D., King C. Reducing the illegal sales of cigarettes to minors: analysis of alternative enforcement schedules. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Fall;29(3):333–344. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lantz P. M., Jacobson P. D., Warner K. E., Wasserman J., Pollack H. A., Berson J., Ahlstrom A. Investing in youth tobacco control: a review of smoking prevention and control strategies. Tob Control. 2000 Mar;9(1):47–63. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.1.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Levy D. T., Chaloupka F., Slater S. Expert opinions on optimal enforcement of minimum purchase age laws for tobacco. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2000 May;6(3):107–114. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200006030-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Levy D. T., Cummings K. M., Hyland A. A simulation of the effects of youth initiation policies on overall cigarette use. Am J Public Health. 2000 Aug;90(8):1311–1314. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.8.1311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Levy D. T., Cummings K. M., Hyland A. Increasing taxes as a strategy to reduce cigarette use and deaths: results of a simulation model. Prev Med. 2000 Sep;31(3):279–286. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Levy D. T., Friend K. B. A simulation model of tobacco youth access policies. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2000 Dec;25(6):1023–1050. doi: 10.1215/03616878-25-6-1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McWhorter W. P., Boyd G. M., Mattson M. E. Predictors of quitting smoking: the NHANES I followup experience. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(12):1399–1405. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90108-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rigotti N. A., DiFranza J. R., Chang Y., Tisdale T., Kemp B., Singer D. E. The effect of enforcing tobacco-sales laws on adolescents' access to tobacco and smoking behavior. N Engl J Med. 1997 Oct 9;337(15):1044–1051. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199710093371505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Shultz J. M., Novotny T. E., Rice D. P. Quantifying the disease impact of cigarette smoking with SAMMEC II software. Public Health Rep. 1991 May-Jun;106(3):326–333. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Stead L. F., Lancaster T. A systematic review of interventions for preventing tobacco sales to minors. Tob Control. 2000 Jun;9(2):169–176. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.2.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES