Abstract
OBJECTIVE—To examine the association between school smoking policies and smoking prevalence among pupils. DESIGN—Multilevel analysis of cross-sectional data from surveys of schools and pupils. SETTING—55 secondary schools in Wales. SUBJECTS—55 teachers and 1375 pupils in year 11 (aged 15-16). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES—Self-reported smoking behaviour. RESULTS—The prevalence of daily smoking in schools with a written policy on smoking for pupils, teachers, and other adults, with no pupils or teachers allowed to smoke anywhere on the school premises, was 9.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 6.1% to 12.9%). In schools with no policy on pupils' or teachers' smoking, 30.1% (95% CI 23.6% to 36.6%) of pupils reported daily smoking. In schools with an intermediate level of smoking policy, 21.0% (95% CI 17.8% to 24.2%) smoked every day. School smoking policy was associated with school level variation in daily smoking (p = 0.002). In multilevel analysis, after adjusting for pupils' sex, parents' and best friends' smoking status, parental expectations, and alienation from school, there was less unexplained school level variation, but school smoking policy remained significant (p = 0.041). The association of smoking policy with weekly smoking was weaker than for daily smoking, and not significant after adjustment for pupil level variables. Both daily and weekly smoking prevalence were lower in schools where pupils' smoking restrictions were always enforced. Enforcement of teacher smoking restrictions was not significantly associated with pupils' smoking. CONCLUSIONS—This study demonstrates an association between policy strength, policy enforcement, and the prevalence of smoking among pupils, after having adjusted for pupil level characteristics. These findings suggest that the wider introduction of comprehensive school smoking policies may help reduce teenage smoking. Keywords: schools; smoking policy; smoking prevalence
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (179.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Lantz P. M., Jacobson P. D., Warner K. E., Wasserman J., Pollack H. A., Berson J., Ahlstrom A. Investing in youth tobacco control: a review of smoking prevention and control strategies. Tob Control. 2000 Mar;9(1):47–63. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.1.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pentz M. A., Brannon B. R., Charlin V. L., Barrett E. J., MacKinnon D. P., Flay B. R. The power of policy: the relationship of smoking policy to adolescent smoking. Am J Public Health. 1989 Jul;79(7):857–862. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.7.857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reid D. Failure of an intervention to stop teenagers smoking. Not such a disappointment as it appears. BMJ. 1999 Oct 9;319(7215):934–935. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7215.934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tyas S. L., Pederson L. L. Psychosocial factors related to adolescent smoking: a critical review of the literature. Tob Control. 1998 Winter;7(4):409–420. doi: 10.1136/tc.7.4.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wakefield M. A., Chaloupka F. J., Kaufman N. J., Orleans C. T., Barker D. C., Ruel E. E. Effect of restrictions on smoking at home, at school, and in public places on teenage smoking: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2000 Aug 5;321(7257):333–337. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7257.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]