Skip to main content
PMC home page
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2001 Jun;10(2):124–134. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.2.124

Tobacco lobby political influence on US state legislatures in the 1990s

M Givel 1, S Glantz 1
PMCID: PMC1747563  PMID: 11387532

Abstract

BACKGROUND—Throughout the 1990s the tobacco lobby was a potent political force in US state legislatures advancing its pro-tobacco agenda.
OBJECTIVE—To describe the market and political motivations of the tobacco lobby and the strategies they use to achieve these goals in US state legislatures.
DESIGN—This study is a content analysis and summary overview of recently released historical tobacco industry documents; tobacco related government documents; and recent state tobacco control policy reports.
RESULTS—In the 1990s, the tobacco lobby engaged in a comprehensive and aggressive political effort in state legislatures to sell tobacco with the least hindrance using lobbying, the media, public relations, front groups, industry allies, and contributions to legislators. These efforts included campaigns to neutralise clean indoor air legislation, minimise tax increases, and preserve the industry's freedom to advertise and sell tobacco. The tobacco lobby succeeded in increasing the number of states that enacted state pre-emption of stricter local tobacco control laws and prevented the passage of many state tobacco control policies. Public health advocates were able to prevent pre-emption and other pro-tobacco policies from being enacted in several states.
CONCLUSIONS—The tobacco lobby is a powerful presence in state legislatures. Because of the poor public image of the tobacco lobby, it seeks to wield this power quietly and behind the scenes. State and local health advocates, who often have high public credibility, can use this fact against the tobacco lobby by focusing public attention on the tobacco lobby's political influence and policy goals and expose links between the tobacco lobby and its legislative supporters.


Keywords: political lobbying; state legislatures; industry

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (156.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Begay M. E., Traynor M., Glantz S. A. The tobacco industry, state politics, and tobacco education in California. Am J Public Health. 1993 Sep;83(9):1214–1221. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.9.1214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bialous S. A., Fox B. J., Glantz S. A. Tobacco industry allegations of "illegal lobbying" and state tobacco control. Am J Public Health. 2001 Jan;91(1):62–67. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.1.62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Biener L., Aseltine R. H., Jr, Cohen B., Anderka M. Reactions of adult and teenaged smokers to the Massachusetts tobacco tax. Am J Public Health. 1998 Sep;88(9):1389–1391. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.9.1389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cardador M. T., Hazan A. R., Glantz S. A. Tobacco industry smokers' rights publications: a content analysis. Am J Public Health. 1995 Sep;85(9):1212–1217. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.9.1212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chapman S., Richardson J. Tobacco excise and declining tobacco consumption: the case of Papua New Guinea. Am J Public Health. 1990 May;80(5):537–540. doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.5.537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clarke H., Wilson M. P., Cummings K. M., Hyland A. The campaign to enact New York City's Smoke-Free Air Act. J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999 Jan;5(1):1–13. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199901000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Crawford V. L. Cancer converts tobacco lobbyist: Victor L. Crawford goes on the record. Interview by Andrew A. Skolnick. JAMA. 1995 Jul 19;274(3):199-200, 202. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.3.199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Givel M. S., Glantz S. A. Failure to defend a successful state tobacco control program: policy lessons from Florida. Am J Public Health. 2000 May;90(5):762–767. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.5.762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Givel M. S., Glantz S. A. Tobacco control and direct democracy in Dade County, Florida: future implications for health advocates. J Public Health Policy. 2000;21(3):268–295. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Glantz S. A., Begay M. E. Tobacco industry campaign contributions are affecting tobacco control policymaking in California. JAMA. 1994 Oct 19;272(15):1176–1182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Glantz S. A., Begay M. E. Tobacco industry campaign contributions are affecting tobacco control policymaking in California. JAMA. 1994 Oct 19;272(15):1176–1182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Goldstein A. O., Bearman N. S. State tobacco lobbyists and organizations in the United States: crossed lines. Am J Public Health. 1996 Aug;86(8):1137–1142. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.8_pt_1.1137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jacobson P. D., Wasserman J., Raube K. The politics of antismoking legislation. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1993 Winter;18(4):787–819. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lewitt E. M., Coate D. The potential for using excise taxes to reduce smoking. J Health Econ. 1982 Aug;1(2):121–145. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(82)90011-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Macdonald H. R., Glantz S. A. Political realities of statewide smoking legislation: the passage of California's Assembly Bill 13. Tob Control. 1997 Spring;6(1):41–54. doi: 10.1136/tc.6.1.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Macdonald H., Aguinaga S., Glantz S. A. The defeat of Philip Morris' 'California Uniform Tobacco Control Act'. Am J Public Health. 1997 Dec;87(12):1989–1996. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.12.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Monardi F., Glantz S. A. Are tobacco industry campaign contributions influencing state legislative behavior? Am J Public Health. 1998 Jun;88(6):918–923. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.6.918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Moore S., Wolfe S. M., Lindes D., Douglas C. E. Epidemiology of failed tobacco control legislation. JAMA. 1994 Oct 19;272(15):1171–1175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ong E. K., Glantz S. A. Tobacco industry efforts subverting International Agency for Research on Cancer's second-hand smoke study. Lancet. 2000 Apr 8;355(9211):1253–1259. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02098-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sachs V., Washington G. Die präoperative Eigenblutspende. Infusionstherapie. 1990 Jun;17(3):131–134. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Samuels B., Glantz S. A. The politics of local tobacco control. JAMA. 1991 Oct 16;266(15):2110–2117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Siegel M., Carol J., Jordan J., Hobart R., Schoenmarklin S., DuMelle F., Fisher P. Preemption in tobacco control. Review of an emerging public health problem. JAMA. 1997 Sep 10;278(10):858–863. doi: 10.1001/jama.278.10.858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Stephens T., Pederson L. L., Koval J. J., Kim C. The relationship of cigarette prices and no-smoking bylaws to the prevalence of smoking in Canada. Am J Public Health. 1997 Sep;87(9):1519–1521. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.9.1519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Traynor M. P., Begay M. E., Glantz S. A. New tobacco industry strategy to prevent local tobacco control. JAMA. 1993 Jul 28;270(4):479–486. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Traynor M. P., Glantz S. A. California's tobacco tax initiative: the development and passage of Proposition 99. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996 Fall;21(3):543–585. doi: 10.1215/03616878-21-3-543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES