Skip to main content
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2001 Dec;10(4):340–344. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.4.340

Role of slotting fees and trade promotions in shaping how tobacco is marketed in retail stores

P Bloom 1
PMCID: PMC1747601  PMID: 11740025

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To examine how the retail environment in which tobacco is sold has changed because of the slotting fees and trade promotions paid by the tobacco companies. Public policy options for dealing with this environment are also evaluated.
DATA SOURCES—A literature review, telephone interviews, and observation.
RESULTS—The tobacco companies have been dramatically increasing the volume of slotting fees and trade promotions they pay to retailers, creating a more tobacco friendly retail environment containing self service displays and ample point-of-sale advertising. Critics express concern that these payments have kept prices lower and more varied than they might be otherwise, created more opportunities for pilferage and underage selling, and provided more youth exposure to tobacco promotions. Public policy makers could either ban these payments, institute policies designed to mitigate their harmful effects, or leave the situation as it is, relying on enforcement of existing statutes as well as market forces to reduce harm. Actions that might mitigate harmful effects would include putting minimum retail prices on tobacco products, banning self service displays, requiring retailers to be licensed, and adding more warning signs at the point of sale.
CONCLUSION—Additional research is needed before determining the most appropriate public policy stance.


Keywords: promotion; slotting; retailing; merchandising

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (107.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Fraser T. Phasing out of point-of-sale tobacco advertising in New Zealand. Tob Control. 1998 Spring;7(1):82–84. doi: 10.1136/tc.7.1.82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Schooler C., Feighery E., Flora J. A. Seventh graders' self-reported exposure to cigarette marketing and its relationship to their smoking behavior. Am J Public Health. 1996 Sep;86(9):1216–1221. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.9.1216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Voorhees C. C., Yanek L. R., Stillman F. A., Becker D. M. Reducing cigarette sales to minors in an urban setting: issues and opportunities for merchant intervention. Am J Prev Med. 1998 Feb;14(2):138–142. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(97)00024-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES