Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2001 Dec;10(4):375–382. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.4.375

Second hand smoke and risk assessment: what was in it for the tobacco industry?

N Hirschhorn 1, S A Bialous 1
PMCID: PMC1747615  PMID: 11740031

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To describe how the tobacco industry attempted to trivialise the health risks of second hand smoke (SHS) by both questioning the science of risk assessment of low dose exposure to other environmental toxins, and by comparing SHS to such substances about which debate might still exist.
METHODS—Analysis of tobacco industry documents made public as part of the settlement of litigation in the USA (Minnesota trial and the Master Settlement Agreement) and available on the internet. Search terms included: risk assessment, low dose exposure, and the names of key players and organisations.
RESULTS/CONCLUSION—The tobacco industry developed a well coordinated, multi-pronged strategy to create doubt about research on exposure to SHS by trying to link it to the broader discussion of risk assessment of low doses of a number of toxins whose disease burden may still be a matter of scientific debate, thus trying to make SHS their equivalent; and by attempting, through third party organisations and persons, to impugn the agencies using risk assessment to establish SHS as a hazard.


Keywords: tobacco industry; risk assessment; environmental tobacco smoke; ETS; second hand smoke; SHS

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (140.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boffetta P., Agudo A., Ahrens W., Benhamou E., Benhamou S., Darby S. C., Ferro G., Fortes C., Gonzalez C. A., Jöckel K. H. Multicenter case-control study of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer in Europe. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 Oct 7;90(19):1440–1450. doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.19.1440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bonita R., Duncan J., Truelsen T., Jackson R. T., Beaglehole R. Passive smoking as well as active smoking increases the risk of acute stroke. Tob Control. 1999 Summer;8(2):156–160. doi: 10.1136/tc.8.2.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Drope J., Chapman S. Tobacco industry efforts at discrediting scientific knowledge of environmental tobacco smoke: a review of internal industry documents. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Aug;55(8):588–594. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.8.588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Glantz S. A. Back to basics: getting smoke-free workplaces back on track. Tob Control. 1997 Autumn;6(3):164–166. doi: 10.1136/tc.6.3.164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hackshaw A. K., Law M. R., Wald N. J. The accumulated evidence on lung cancer and environmental tobacco smoke. BMJ. 1997 Oct 18;315(7114):980–988. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7114.980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hirayama T. Non-smoking wives of heavy smokers have a higher risk of lung cancer: a study from Japan. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1981 Jan 17;282(6259):183–185. doi: 10.1136/bmj.282.6259.183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hirschhorn N. Shameful science: four decades of the German tobacco industry's hidden research on smoking and health. Tob Control. 2000 Jun;9(2):242–248. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.2.242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lash T. L., Aschengrau A. Active and passive cigarette smoking and the occurrence of breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Jan 1;149(1):5–12. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Law M. R., Morris J. K., Wald N. J. Environmental tobacco smoke exposure and ischaemic heart disease: an evaluation of the evidence. BMJ. 1997 Oct 18;315(7114):973–980. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7114.973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Manley M. W., Pierce J. P., Gilpin E. A., Rosbrook B., Berry C., Wun L. M. Impact of the American Stop Smoking Intervention Study on cigarette consumption. Tob Control. 1997;6 (Suppl 2):S12–S16. doi: 10.1136/tc.6.suppl_2.s12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Muggli M. E., Forster J. L., Hurt R. D., Repace J. L. The smoke you don't see: uncovering tobacco industry scientific strategies aimed against environmental tobacco smoke policies. Am J Public Health. 2001 Sep;91(9):1419–1423. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.9.1419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ong E. K., Glantz S. A. Tobacco industry efforts subverting International Agency for Research on Cancer's second-hand smoke study. Lancet. 2000 Apr 8;355(9211):1253–1259. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02098-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Saloojee Y., Dagli E. Tobacco industry tactics for resisting public policy on health. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(7):902–910. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Trichopoulos D., Kalandidi A., Sparros L., MacMahon B. Lung cancer and passive smoking. Int J Cancer. 1981 Jan 15;27(1):1–4. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910270102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES