Skip to main content
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2001 Dec;10(4):317–322. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.4.317

Comprehensive tobacco control policies and the smoking behaviour of Canadian adults

T Stephens 1, L Pederson 1, J Koval 1, J Macnab 1
PMCID: PMC1747621  PMID: 11740021

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To examine the associations of cigarette prices, restrictions on public smoking, and health education with the odds of adult smoking and amount smoked daily.
DESIGN—Multi-level analysis of adult (age 25+) smoking patterns in Canada's National Population Health Survey, after adding administrative data on prices, bylaws, and health education according to the survey respondent's place of residence.
SETTING/SUBJECTS—Population based sample of Canadians age 25+ in households (n = 14 355).
OUTCOME MEASURES—Smoking status, amount consumed daily.
ANALYSIS—Logistic regression for smoking status, multiple regression for amount smoked, with controls for age, education, marital status; separate analyses for men and women.
RESULTS—Cigarette prices were positively associated with the odds of being a non-smoker and negatively with amount smoked, for adults of both sexes. Per capita health education expenditures were positively associated with the odds of being a non-smoker and negatively with amount smoked—for men but not women. The restrictiveness of municipal bylaws limiting public smoking was positively associated with the odds of being a non-smoker and negatively with amount smoked—for women but not men. These results are independent of age, education, and marital status.
CONCLUSIONS—To be effective, tobacco control must comprise a mix of strategies as men and women respond differently to health education and restrictions on public smoking; taxation, reflected in higher cigarette prices, is the only one of these measures related to smoking for both sexes. This model permits calculations of the level of increase in each measure that is required to reduce the prevalence of smoking by a specified amount.


Keywords: bylaws; education; policy; taxes

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (175.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Breslow L., Johnson M. California's Proposition 99 on tobacco, and its impact. Annu Rev Public Health. 1993;14:585–604. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.14.050193.003101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Diez-Roux A. V. Bringing context back into epidemiology: variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis. Am J Public Health. 1998 Feb;88(2):216–222. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.2.216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hamilton V. H., Levinton C., St-Pierre Y., Grimard F. The effect of tobacco tax cuts on cigarette smoking in Canada. CMAJ. 1997 Jan 15;156(2):187–191. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kaiserman M. J., Rogers B. Tobacco consumption declining faster in Canada than in the US. Am J Public Health. 1991 Jul;81(7):902–904. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.7.902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mummery W. K., Hagen L. C. Tobacco pricing, taxation, consumption and revenue: Alberta 1985-1995. Can J Public Health. 1996 Sep-Oct;87(5):314–316. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Peterson D. E., Zeger S. L., Remington P. L., Anderson H. A. The effect of state cigarette tax increases on cigarette sales, 1955 to 1988. Am J Public Health. 1992 Jan;82(1):94–96. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.1.94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pierce J. P., Fiore M. C., Novotny T. E., Hatziandreu E. J., Davis R. M. Trends in cigarette smoking in the United States. Projections to the year 2000. JAMA. 1989 Jan 6;261(1):61–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rigotti N. A., Pashos C. L. No-smoking laws in the United States. An analysis of state and city actions to limit smoking in public places and workplaces. JAMA. 1991 Dec 11;266(22):3162–3167. doi: 10.1001/jama.266.22.3162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Stephens T., Pederson L. L., Koval J. J., Kim C. The relationship of cigarette prices and no-smoking bylaws to the prevalence of smoking in Canada. Am J Public Health. 1997 Sep;87(9):1519–1521. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.9.1519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Townsend J., Roderick P., Cooper J. Cigarette smoking by socioeconomic group, sex, and age: effects of price, income, and health publicity. BMJ. 1994 Oct 8;309(6959):923–927. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6959.923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Warner K. E. Smoking and health implications of a change in the federal cigarette excise tax. JAMA. 1986 Feb 28;255(8):1028–1032. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wasserman J. How effective are excise tax increases in reducing cigarette smoking? Am J Public Health. 1992 Jan;82(1):19–20. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wasserman J., Manning W. G., Newhouse J. P., Winkler J. D. The effects of excise taxes and regulations on cigarette smoking. J Health Econ. 1991 May;10(1):43–64. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(91)90016-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES