Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2002 Mar;11(1):26–34. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.1.26

Application of a rating system to state clean indoor air laws (USA)

J Chriqui 1, M Frosh 1, R Brownson 1, D Shelton 1, R Sciandra 1, R Hobart 1, P Fisher 1, R el Arculli 1, M Alciati 1
PMCID: PMC1747656  PMID: 11891365

Abstract

Objective: To develop and implement a system for rating state clean indoor air laws.

Design: The public health interest of state clean indoor air laws is to limit non-smoker exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). Current estimates of health risks and methods available for controlling ETS provided a framework for devising a ratings scale. An advisory committee applied this scale to each of seven site specific smoking restrictions and two enforcement related items. For each item, a target score of +4 was identified. The nine items were then combined to produce a summary score for each state. A state that achieved the target across all nine items would receive a summary score of 36 points and be eligible to receive an additional 6 points for exceeding the target on six of the nine items, resulting in a maximum summary score of 42 points. Individual scores were also adjusted to reflect state level preemption measures. Each state's law was evaluated annually from 1993 through 1999.

Setting: USA.

Main outcome measure: A summary score measuring the extensiveness of the state's clean indoor air law.

Results: State laws restricting smoking in the seven individual locations of interest were relatively weak. The overall mean score across the location restrictions ranged from 0.72 in 1993 to 0.98 in 1999. Mean scores were higher for the enforcement items than for the location restrictions. Summary scores ranged from 0 to 20 in 1993 and 0 to 31 in 1994 through 1999. Average summary scores ranged from 8.71 in 1993 to 10.98 in 1999. By the end of 1999, scores increased for 22 states; however, between 1995 and 1997 there were no changes in the summary scores. Three states scored zero points across all years. From 1993 through 1999, there was a 41% increase in the number of states that had in place state level preemption measures.

Conclusion: The number of newly enacted state clean indoor air laws has remained relatively stagnant since 1995. With a few exceptions, as of the end of 1999, progress in enacting state laws to meet specified public health targets for reducing exposure to ETS was relatively low. Thus, state laws in the USA provide, on average, only minimal protection in specified areas and, given the increase in preemption, are increasingly undermining those passed in localities.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (131.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alciati M. H., Frosh M., Green S. B., Brownson R. C., Fisher P. H., Hobart R., Roman A., Sciandra R. C., Shelton D. M. State laws on youth access to tobacco in the United States: measuring their extensiveness with a new rating system. Tob Control. 1998 Winter;7(4):345–352. doi: 10.1136/tc.7.4.345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashley M. J., Ferrence R. Reducing children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in homes: issues and strategies. Tob Control. 1998 Spring;7(1):61–65. doi: 10.1136/tc.7.1.61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Becker D. M., Conner H. F., Waranch H. R., Stillman F., Pennington L., Lees P. S., Oski F. The impact of a total ban on smoking in the Johns Hopkins Children's Center. JAMA. 1989 Aug 11;262(6):799–802. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Biener L., Fitzgerald G. Smoky bars and restaurants: who avoids them and why? J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999 Jan;5(1):74–78. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199901000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Biener L., Siegel M. Behavior intentions of the public after bans on smoking in restaurants and bars. Am J Public Health. 1997 Dec;87(12):2042–2044. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.12.2042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Borland R., Pierce J. P., Burns D. M., Gilpin E., Johnson M., Bal D. Protection from environmental tobacco smoke in California. The case for a smoke-free workplace. JAMA. 1992 Aug 12;268(6):749–752. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brownson R. C., Eriksen M. P., Davis R. M., Warner K. E. Environmental tobacco smoke: health effects and policies to reduce exposure. Annu Rev Public Health. 1997;18:163–185. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.18.1.163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chapman S., Borland R., Scollo M., Brownson R. C., Dominello A., Woodward S. The impact of smoke-free workplaces on declining cigarette consumption in Australia and the United States. Am J Public Health. 1999 Jul;89(7):1018–1023. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.7.1018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Crawford V. L. Cancer converts tobacco lobbyist: Victor L. Crawford goes on the record. Interview by Andrew A. Skolnick. JAMA. 1995 Jul 19;274(3):199-200, 202. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.3.199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Farkas A. J., Gilpin E. A., Distefan J. M., Pierce J. P. The effects of household and workplace smoking restrictions on quitting behaviours. Tob Control. 1999 Autumn;8(3):261–265. doi: 10.1136/tc.8.3.261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Farrelly M. C., Evans W. N., Sfekas A. E. The impact of workplace smoking bans: results from a national survey. Tob Control. 1999 Autumn;8(3):272–277. doi: 10.1136/tc.8.3.272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Glantz S. A., Smith L. R. The effect of ordinances requiring smoke-free restaurants and bars on revenues: a follow-up. Am J Public Health. 1997 Oct;87(10):1687–1693. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.10.1687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hammond S. K., Sorensen G., Youngstrom R., Ockene J. K. Occupational exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. JAMA. 1995 Sep 27;274(12):956–960. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hopkins D. P., Briss P. A., Ricard C. J., Husten C. G., Carande-Kulis V. G., Fielding J. E., Alao M. O., McKenna J. W., Sharp D. J., Harris J. R. Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Am J Prev Med. 2001 Feb;20(2 Suppl):16–66. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00297-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hyland A., Cummings K. M., Wilson M. P. Compliance with the New York City Smoke-Free Air Act. J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999 Jan;5(1):43–52. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199901000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jones K., Wakefield M., Turnbull D. A. Attitudes and experiences of restaurateurs regarding smoking bans in Adelaide, South Australia. Tob Control. 1999 Spring;8(1):62–66. doi: 10.1136/tc.8.1.62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Longo D. R., Brownson R. C., Kruse R. L. Smoking bans in US hospitals. Results of a national survey. JAMA. 1995 Aug 9;274(6):488–491. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Luke D. A., Stamatakis K. A., Brownson R. C. State youth-access tobacco control policies and youth smoking behavior in the United States. Am J Prev Med. 2000 Oct;19(3):180–187. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00196-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Repace J. L., Lowrey A. H. An enforceable indoor air quality standard for environmental tobacco smoke in the workplace. Risk Anal. 1993 Aug;13(4):463–475. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb00747.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rigotti N. A., Stoto M. A., Schelling T. C. Do businesses comply with a no-smoking law? Assessing the self-enforcement approach. Prev Med. 1994 Mar;23(2):223–229. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1994.1030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shopland D. R., Gerlach K. K., Burns D. M., Hartman A. M., Gibson J. T. State-specific trends in smoke-free workplace policy coverage: the current population survey tobacco use supplement, 1993 to 1999. J Occup Environ Med. 2001 Aug;43(8):680–686. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200108000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Siegel M., Carol J., Jordan J., Hobart R., Schoenmarklin S., DuMelle F., Fisher P. Preemption in tobacco control. Review of an emerging public health problem. JAMA. 1997 Sep 10;278(10):858–863. doi: 10.1001/jama.278.10.858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Siegel M. Involuntary smoking in the restaurant workplace. A review of employee exposure and health effects. JAMA. 1993 Jul 28;270(4):490–493. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Stillman F. A., Becker D. M., Swank R. T., Hantula D., Moses H., Glantz S., Waranch H. R. Ending smoking at the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions. An evaluation of smoking prevalence and indoor air pollution. JAMA. 1990 Sep 26;264(12):1565–1569. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sweda E. L., Jr, Gottlieb M. A., Porfiri R. C. Protecting children from exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Tob Control. 1998 Spring;7(1):1–2. doi: 10.1136/tc.7.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Vaughan W. M., Hammond S. K. Impact of "designated smoking area" policy on nicotine vapor and particle concentrations in a modern office building. J Air Waste Manage Assoc. 1990 Jul;40(7):1012–1017. doi: 10.1080/10473289.1990.10466741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wakefield M. A., Chaloupka F. J. Improving the measurement and use of tobacco control "inputs". Tob Control. 1998 Winter;7(4):333–335. doi: 10.1136/tc.7.4.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wakefield M. A., Chaloupka F. J., Kaufman N. J., Orleans C. T., Barker D. C., Ruel E. E. Effect of restrictions on smoking at home, at school, and in public places on teenage smoking: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2000 Aug 5;321(7257):333–337. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7257.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Williams D. C., Whitaker J. R., Jennings W. G. Measurement of nicotine in building air as an indicator of tobacco smoke levels. Environ Health Perspect. 1985 May;60:405–410. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8560405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES