Abstract
Background: Among all racial and ethnic groups in the USA, African Americans bear the greatest burden from tobacco related disease. The tobacco industry has been highly influential in the African American community for decades, providing funding and other resources to community leaders and emphasising publicly its support for civil rights causes and groups, while ignoring the negative health effects of its products on those it claims to support. However, the industry's private business reasons for providing such support were unknown.
Objective: To understand how and for what purposes the tobacco industry sought to establish and maintain relationships with African American leaders.
Methods: Review and analysis of over 700 previously secret internal tobacco industry documents available on the internet.
Results: The tobacco industry established relationships with virtually every African American leadership organisation and built longstanding social connections with the community, for three specific business reasons: to increase African American tobacco use, to use African Americans as a frontline force to defend industry policy positions, and to defuse tobacco control efforts.
Conclusion: As the tobacco industry expands its global reach, public health advocates should anticipate similar industry efforts to exploit the vulnerabilities of marginalised groups. The apparent generosity, inclusion, and friendship proffered by the industry extract a price from groups in the health of their members. Helping groups anticipate such efforts, confront industry co-optation, and understand the hidden costs of accepting tobacco industry largesse should be part of worldwide tobacco control efforts.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (161.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Balbach E. D., Gasior R. J., Barbeau E. M. Tobacco industry documents: comparing the Minnesota Depository and internet access. Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11(1):68–72. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.1.68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Emont S. L., Dorrell S. M., Bishop K., McClain R. The burden of smoking-attributable mortality among African Americans--Indiana, 1990. Addict Behav. 1995 Sep-Oct;20(5):563–569. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(95)00016-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Givel M. S., Glantz S. A. Tobacco lobby political influence on US state legislatures in the 1990s. Tob Control. 2001 Jun;10(2):124–134. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.2.124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hench P. S. Recent Researches on Arthritis and Rheumatism in the United States. Ann Rheum Dis. 1939 May;1(2):109–133. doi: 10.1136/ard.1.2.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jha P., Chaloupka F. J. The economics of global tobacco control. BMJ. 2000 Aug 5;321(7257):358–361. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7257.358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Malone R. E., Balbach E. D. Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire? Tob Control. 2000 Sep;9(3):334–338. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.3.334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reynolds C. Michael, Meyer Jacques, Poole Leslie B. An NADH-dependent bacterial thioredoxin reductase-like protein in conjunction with a glutaredoxin homologue form a unique peroxiredoxin (AhpC) reducing system in Clostridium pasteurianum. Biochemistry. 2002 Feb 12;41(6):1990–2001. doi: 10.1021/bi011802p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Warner K. E., Goldenhar L. M. The cigarette advertising broadcast ban and magazine coverage of smoking and health. J Public Health Policy. 1989 Spring;10(1):32–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.