Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2002 Dec;11(4):372–375. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.4.372

Tobacco spending and children in low income households

G Thomson 1, N Wilson 1, D O'Dea 1, P Reid 1, P Howden-Chapman 1
PMCID: PMC1747677  PMID: 12432164

Abstract

Objective: To examine the role of tobacco use in creating financial hardship for New Zealand (NZ) low income households with children.

Data: The 1996 NZ census (smoking prevalence by household types), Statistics NZ (household spending surveys 1988-98), and NZ Customs (tobacco released from bond 1988-98).

Main outcome measures: Proportion of children in households with smokers and ≤$NZ15 000 gross income per adult. Proportion of spending on tobacco of second lowest equivalised household disposable income decile and of solo parent households.

Results: In ≤$NZ15 000 gross income per adult households with both children and smokers, there were over 90 000 children, or 11% of the total population aged less than 15 years. Enabling second lowest income decile households with smokers to be smoker-free would on average allow an estimated 14% of the non-housing budgets of those households to be reallocated.

Conclusions: The children in low income households with smokers need to be protected from the financial hardship caused by tobacco use. This protection could take the form of more comprehensive government support for such households and stronger tobacco control programmes. A reliance on tobacco price policy alone to deter smokers is likely to have mixed outcomes—for example, increased hardship among some of these households. The challenge for tobacco control is to move from a sole focus on "doing good" towards incorporating the principle of "doing no harm".

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (145.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bains N., Pickett W., Hoey J. The use and impact of incentives in population-based smoking cessation programs: a review. Am J Health Promot. 1998 May-Jun;12(5):307–320. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-12.5.307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blackwell D. L., Hayward M. D., Crimmins E. M. Does childhood health affect chronic morbidity in later life? Soc Sci Med. 2001 Apr;52(8):1269–1284. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00230-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chapman S., Borland R., Scollo M., Brownson R. C., Dominello A., Woodward S. The impact of smoke-free workplaces on declining cigarette consumption in Australia and the United States. Am J Public Health. 1999 Jul;89(7):1018–1023. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.7.1018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Crampton P., Salmond C., Woodward A., Reid P. Socioeconomic deprivation and ethnicity are both important for anti-tobacco health promotion. Health Educ Behav. 2000 Jun;27(3):317–327. doi: 10.1177/109019810002700306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Efroymson D., Ahmed S., Townsend J., Alam S. M., Dey A. R., Saha R., Dhar B., Sujon A. I., Ahmed K. U., Rahman O. Hungry for tobacco: an analysis of the economic impact of tobacco consumption on the poor in Bangladesh. Tob Control. 2001 Sep;10(3):212–217. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.3.212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Flay B. R. Mass media and smoking cessation: a critical review. Am J Public Health. 1987 Feb;77(2):153–160. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.2.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hamilton V. H., Levinton C., St-Pierre Y., Grimard F. The effect of tobacco tax cuts on cigarette smoking in Canada. CMAJ. 1997 Jan 15;156(2):187–191. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jha P., Chaloupka F. J. The economics of global tobacco control. BMJ. 2000 Aug 5;321(7257):358–361. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7257.358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Johnson R. K., Wang M. Q., Smith M. J., Connolly G. The association between parental smoking and the diet quality of low-income children. Pediatrics. 1996 Mar;97(3):312–317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lam T. H., Leung G. M., Ho L. M. The effects of environmental tobacco smoke on health services utilization in the first eighteen months of life. Pediatrics. 2001 Jun;107(6):E91–E91. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.6.e91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Li J. S., Peat J. K., Xuan W., Berry G. Meta-analysis on the association between environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure and the prevalence of lower respiratory tract infection in early childhood. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1999 Jan;27(1):5–13. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0496(199901)27:1<5::aid-ppul3>3.0.co;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Morley R. The influence of early diet on later development. J Biosoc Sci. 1996 Oct;28(4):481–487. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000022549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nelson M. Childhood nutrition and poverty. Proc Nutr Soc. 2000 May;59(2):307–315. doi: 10.1017/s0029665100000343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Stead L. F., Lancaster T., Silagy C. A. Updating a systematic review--what difference did it make? Case study of nicotine replacement therapy. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2001 Nov 1;1:10–10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-1-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Thomson G. W., Wilson N. A. Lost in the smoke: tobacco control in New Zealand during the 1990s. N Z Med J. 2000 Apr 14;113(1107):122–124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Turrell Gavin, Battistutta Diana, McGuffog Ingrid. Social determinants of smoking among parents with infants. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2002 Feb;26(1):30–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2002.tb00267.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES