Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2002 Dec;11(4):300–304. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.4.300

Socially cued smoking in bars, nightclubs, and gaming venues: a case for introducing smoke-free policies

L Trotter 1, M Wakefield 1, R Borland 1
PMCID: PMC1747690  PMID: 12432155

Abstract

Objective: To assess smokers' perceived effects of smoking bans in bars, nightclubs, and gaming venues on their smoking behaviour.

Design: Cross sectional structured interview telephone survey of a random sample of smokers.

Setting: Population survey in Victoria, Australia.

Participants: The sample comprised 597 smokers and analyses were conducted on 409 smokers who reported patronising bars, nightclubs or gaming venues at least monthly.

Outcome measures: Two outcomes studied were socially cued smoking and readiness to quit as a result of restrictions on smoking in social venues. Respondents were identified as socially cued smokers if they reported attending bars, nightclubs or gaming venues at least monthly and said that they smoke more in these venues. The potential influence of bans in social venues on readiness to quit was measured by asking respondents if they would be more or less likely to quit smoking if smoking were banned in hotels, licensed bars, gaming venues, and nightclubs.

Results: Of all adult smokers, 69% attended bars, nightclubs or gaming venues at least monthly. Of these smokers, 70% reported smoking more in these settings (socially cued smokers) and 25% indicated they would be likely to quit if smoking were banned in social venues. Compared to smokers not likely to quit if there were bans, smokers likely to quit were more likely to be socially cued (odds ratio (OR) 2.64), to be contemplating or preparing to quit (OR 2.22), to approve of bans in social venues (OR 2.44), and to be aged under 30 years (OR 1.73). Compared with smokers not socially cued, socially cued smokers were more likely to be under the age of 30 years (OR 6.15), more likely to believe that there is a safe level of cigarette consumption (OR 2.25), and more likely to have previously made a quit attempt (OR 2.60).

Conclusions: These findings suggest that bans on smoking in bars, nightclubs, and gaming venues could reduce cigarette consumption and increase quitting among smokers who frequently patronise these settings. These beneficial effects are likely to be strongest among younger smokers.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (140.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Biener L., Nyman A. L. Effect of workplace smoking policies on smoking cessation: results of a longitudinal study. J Occup Environ Med. 1999 Dec;41(12):1121–1127. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199912000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Borland R., Mullins R., Trotter L., White V. Trends in environmental tobacco smoke restrictions in the home in Victoria, Australia. Tob Control. 1999 Autumn;8(3):266–271. doi: 10.1136/tc.8.3.266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Borland R. Slip-ups and relapse in attempts to quit smoking. Addict Behav. 1990;15(3):235–245. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(90)90066-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chapman S., Borland R., Scollo M., Brownson R. C., Dominello A., Woodward S. The impact of smoke-free workplaces on declining cigarette consumption in Australia and the United States. Am J Public Health. 1999 Jul;89(7):1018–1023. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.7.1018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Choi W. S., Pierce J. P., Gilpin E. A., Farkas A. J., Berry C. C. Which adolescent experimenters progress to established smoking in the United States. Am J Prev Med. 1997 Sep-Oct;13(5):385–391. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fagerstrom K. O., Schneider N. G. Measuring nicotine dependence: a review of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. J Behav Med. 1989 Apr;12(2):159–182. doi: 10.1007/BF00846549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Farkas A. J., Gilpin E. A., Distefan J. M., Pierce J. P. The effects of household and workplace smoking restrictions on quitting behaviours. Tob Control. 1999 Autumn;8(3):261–265. doi: 10.1136/tc.8.3.261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Farkas A. J., Gilpin E. A., White M. M., Pierce J. P. Association between household and workplace smoking restrictions and adolescent smoking. JAMA. 2000 Aug 9;284(6):717–722. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.6.717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gilpin E. A., White M. M., Farkas A. J., Pierce J. P. Home smoking restrictions: which smokers have them and how they are associated with smoking behavior. Nicotine Tob Res. 1999 Jun;1(2):153–162. doi: 10.1080/14622299050011261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hill D., Borland R. Adults' accounts of onset of regular smoking: influences of school, work, and other settings. Public Health Rep. 1991 Mar-Apr;106(2):181–185. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Katz S. K., Lavack A. M. Tobacco related bar promotions: insights from tobacco industry documents. Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 (Suppl 1):I92–101. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Owen N., Borland R. Delayed compensatory cigarette consumption after a workplace smoking ban. Tob Control. 1997 Summer;6(2):131–135. doi: 10.1136/tc.6.2.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Philpot S. J., Ryan S. A., Torre L. E., Wilcox H. M., Jalleh G., Jamrozik K. Effect of smoke-free policies on the behaviour of social smokers. Tob Control. 1999 Autumn;8(3):278–281. doi: 10.1136/tc.8.3.278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pierce J. P., Choi W. S., Gilpin E. A., Farkas A. J., Merritt R. K. Validation of susceptibility as a predictor of which adolescents take up smoking in the United States. Health Psychol. 1996 Sep;15(5):355–361. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.15.5.355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Prochaska J. O., DiClemente C. C., Norcross J. C. In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol. 1992 Sep;47(9):1102–1114. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.47.9.1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schofield P. E., Borland R., Hill D. J., Pattison P. E., Hibbert M. E. Instability in smoking patterns among school leavers in Victoria, Australia. Tob Control. 1998 Summer;7(2):149–155. doi: 10.1136/tc.7.2.149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sepe Edward, Glantz Stanton A. Bar and club tobacco promotions in the alternative press: targeting young adults. Am J Public Health. 2002 Jan;92(1):75–78. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.1.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sepe Edward, Ling Pamela M., Glantz Stanton A. Smooth moves: bar and nightclub tobacco promotions that target young adults. Am J Public Health. 2002 Mar;92(3):414–419. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.3.414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Shiffman S. Relapse following smoking cessation: a situational analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1982 Feb;50(1):71–86. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.50.1.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Shiffman S. Tobacco "chippers"--individual differences in tobacco dependence. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1989;97(4):539–547. doi: 10.1007/BF00439561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wakefield M. A., Chaloupka F. J., Kaufman N. J., Orleans C. T., Barker D. C., Ruel E. E. Effect of restrictions on smoking at home, at school, and in public places on teenage smoking: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2000 Aug 5;321(7257):333–337. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7257.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES