Skip to main content
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2003 Jun;12(2):155–160. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.2.155

Youth preferences for cigar brands: rates of use and characteristics of users

S Soldz 1, D Huyser 1, E Dorsey 1
PMCID: PMC1747708  PMID: 12773725

Abstract

Objective: Youth use of cigars has increased in the USA. Understanding brand preference among youth could help explain the attraction to cigars, and develop prevention strategies. This study reports on youth characteristics associated with preferences for cigar brands.

Design: Data are presented on 5006 students in grades 7–12 (ages 12–18 years) in classrooms administered the cigar use reasons evaluation (CURE), a questionnaire assessing alternative tobacco use (cigars, bidis, and kreteks).

Setting: Twelve middle and high schools across Massachusetts.

Main outcome measures: Preferred brands of cigars.

Results: Cigar smoking was reported by 16.4% of the sample. The brands preferred by over 5% of cigar users were Phillies (overall prevalence: 31.0%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 27.9% to 34.3%), Black & Mild (12.3%, 95% CI 9.8% to 15.4%), Garcia y Vega (11.4%, 95% CI 9.3% to 13.8%), Swisher Sweets (9.6%, 95% CI 7.6% to 12.2%), Backwoods (6.1%, 95% CI 4.6% to 8.1%), and non-listed brands (16.4%, 95% CI 14.0% to 19.0%). Male cigar smokers were significantly more likely than females to prefer five brands: Backwoods, Dutch Masters, Garcia y Vega, Phillies, and Swisher Sweets, while females were more likely to prefer Black & Mild and non-listed brands. Brand preferences were also distinguished by self, friends' and siblings' tobacco use, race/ethnicity, parents' education and cigar use, GPA (grade point average), college plans, and community type. Urban students were more likely to prefer Black & Mild; students whose parents smoke cigars preferred non-listed brands.

Conclusions: Youth prefer certain brands, most notably Phillies. Particular brands are preferred by particular youth subgroups, raising the possibility of selective marketing toward these groups.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (100.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Albert P. S. Longitudinal data analysis (repeated measures) in clinical trials. Stat Med. 1999 Jul 15;18(13):1707–1732. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19990715)18:13<1707::aid-sim138>3.0.co;2-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker F., Ainsworth S. R., Dye J. T., Crammer C., Thun M. J., Hoffmann D., Repace J. L., Henningfield J. E., Slade J., Pinney J. Health risks associated with cigar smoking. JAMA. 2000 Aug 9;284(6):735–740. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.6.735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Cigar smoking among teenagers--United States, Massachusetts, and New York, 1996. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1997 May 23;46(20):433–440. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Delnevo Cristine D., Pevzner Eric S., Steinberg Michael B., Warren Charles W., Slade John. Cigar use in New Jersey among adolescents and adults. Am J Public Health. 2002 Jun;92(6):943–945. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.6.943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Falit J. L. Cigar advertising: targeting "baby-boomers" and older adults. Tob Control. 1997 Autumn;6(3):240–242. doi: 10.1136/tc.6.3.240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Healton C., Messeri P., Reynolds J., Wolfe C., Stokes C., Ross J., Flint K., Robb W., Farrelly M., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Tobacco use among middle and high school students--United States, 1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2000 Jan 28;49(3):49–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jacobs E. J., Thun M. J., Apicella L. F. Cigar smoking and death from coronary heart disease in a prospective study of US men. Arch Intern Med. 1999 Nov 8;159(20):2413–2418. doi: 10.1001/archinte.159.20.2413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. La Vecchia C., Bosetti C., Negri E., Levi F., Franceschi S. Cigar smoking and cancers of the upper digestive tract. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 Nov 4;90(21):1670–1670. doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.21.1670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pitard A., Brennan P., Clavel J., Greiser E., Lopez-Abente G., Chang-Claude J., Wahrendorf J., Serra C., Kogevinas M., Boffetta P. Cigar, pipe, and cigarette smoking and bladder cancer risk in European men. Cancer Causes Control. 2001 Aug;12(6):551–556. doi: 10.1023/a:1011291015233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Soldz Stephen, Clark T. W., Stewart E., Celebucki C., Klein Walker D. Decreased youth tobacco use in Massachusetts 1996 to 1999: evidence of tobacco control effectiveness. Tob Control. 2002 Jun;11 (Suppl 2):ii14–ii19. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_2.ii14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wenger L. D., Malone R. E., George A., Bero L. A. Cigar magazines: using tobacco to sell a lifestyle. Tob Control. 2001 Sep;10(3):279–284. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.3.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wenger L., Malone R., Bero L. The cigar revival and the popular press: a content analysis, 1987-1997. Am J Public Health. 2001 Feb;91(2):288–291. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.2.288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES