Skip to main content
PMC home page
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1987 Apr;31(4):527–530. doi: 10.1128/aac.31.4.527

Ciprofloxacin versus vancomycin in the therapy of experimental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis.

G W Kaatz, S L Barriere, D R Schaberg, R Fekety
PMCID: PMC174771  PMID: 3649202

Abstract

We compared the efficacy of ciprofloxacin with that of vancomycin by using the rabbit model of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. Endocarditis was treated with ciprofloxacin (25 mg/kg [body weight] intravenously every 8 h) or vancomycin (17.5 mg/kg intravenously every 6 h) for 3 days. Vancomycin and ciprofloxacin were equally efficacious in clearing bacteremia. Both reduced vegetation bacterial counts by 5 log10 CFU/g and renal and splenic bacterial counts by more than 3 log10 CFU/g as compared with untreated control rabbits after 26 h of infection (P less than 0.001). Both antimicrobial agents were able to eradicate the infectious process in an equivalent proportion of animals. No methicillin-resistant S. aureus that was recovered from ciprofloxacin-treated rabbits developed resistance to ciprofloxacin during therapy. Peak concentrations of ciprofloxacin in the sera of rabbits with endocarditis were significantly higher than those predicted by single-dose studies in uninfected rabbits. This finding was likely due to changes in the pharmacokinetics of the drug with multiple dosing and in infected versus uninfected rabbits. This study demonstrated that intravenously administered ciprofloxacin is as efficacious as vancomycin is in an in vivo model of a serious systemic methicillin-resistant S. aureus infection.

Full text

PDF
527

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bennett J. V., Brodie J. L., Benner E. J., Kirby W. M. Simplified, accurate method for antibiotic assay of clinical specimens. Appl Microbiol. 1966 Mar;14(2):170–177. doi: 10.1128/am.14.2.170-177.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gonzalez M. A., Moranchel A. H., Duran S., Pichardo A., Magana J. L., Painter B., Drusano G. L. Multiple-dose ciprofloxacin dose ranging and kinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1985 Jun;37(6):633–637. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1985.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Haley R. W., Hightower A. W., Khabbaz R. F., Thornsberry C., Martone W. J., Allen J. R., Hughes J. M. The emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in United States hospitals. Possible role of the house staff-patient transfer circuit. Ann Intern Med. 1982 Sep;97(3):297–308. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-97-3-297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Humphreys H., Mulvihill E. Ciprofloxacin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet. 1985 Aug 17;2(8451):383–383. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92510-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Höffken G., Lode H., Prinzing C., Borner K., Koeppe P. Pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin after oral and parenteral administration. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Mar;27(3):375–379. doi: 10.1128/aac.27.3.375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Saravolatz L. D., Markowitz N., Arking L., Pohlod D., Fisher E. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Epidemiologic observations during a community-acquired outbreak. Ann Intern Med. 1982 Jan;96(1):11–16. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-96-1-11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Saravolatz L. D., Pohlod D. J., Arking L. M. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: a new source for nosocomial outbreaks. Ann Intern Med. 1982 Sep;97(3):325–329. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-97-3-325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Smith S. M., Eng R. H. Activity of ciprofloxacin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 May;27(5):688–691. doi: 10.1128/aac.27.5.688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Smith S. M. In vitro comparison of A-56619, A-56620, amifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, enoxacin, norfloxacin, and ofloxacin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 Feb;29(2):325–326. doi: 10.1128/aac.29.2.325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sorrell T. C., Packham D. R., Shanker S., Foldes M., Munro R. Vancomycin therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Ann Intern Med. 1982 Sep;97(3):344–350. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-97-3-344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Stratton C. W., Reller L. B. Serum dilution test for bactericidal activity. I. Selection of a physiologic diluent. J Infect Dis. 1977 Aug;136(2):187–195. doi: 10.1093/infdis/136.2.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wingender W., Graefe K. H., Gau W., Förster D., Beermann D., Schacht P. Pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin after oral and intravenous administration in healthy volunteers. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Aug;3(4):355–359. doi: 10.1007/BF01977494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wise R., Lockley R. M., Webberly M., Dent J. Pharmacokinetics of intravenously administered ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Aug;26(2):208–210. doi: 10.1128/aac.26.2.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES