Skip to main content
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2003 Jun;12(2):189–194. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.2.189

Preferences and practices among renters regarding smoking restrictions in apartment buildings

D Hennrikus 1, P Pentel 1, S Sandell 1
PMCID: PMC1747712  PMID: 12773730

Abstract

Objective: This study assessed renters' preferences for official smoking policies in their buildings and their practices concerning restricting tobacco smoking in their apartments.

Design: Renters (n = 301) living in large apartment complexes in a suburb of Minneapolis, Minnesota, completed a mail survey.

Main outcome measures: The survey asked about the official smoking policies in place in their apartment buildings, their preferences for policies, whether they had smelled tobacco smoke coming into their apartments from without, and, if so, what they had done about it.

Results: The majority of non-smokers (79%) preferred that their building be smoke-free. When asked to identify the current smoking policy in their buildings, residents disagreed substantially. Most renters (60%) reported smoke-free policies in their own apartments and another significant proportion (23%) restricted smoking to certain areas or occasions or persons. 75% thought that enforcing a smoke-free policy for guests would not be difficult. 53% of those in non-smoking households had smelled tobacco smoke in their apartments; most of these reported being bothered by it. However, very few complained to the building owner or manager (15.5%) or to the smoker (6.9%).

Conclusions: The majority of non-smokers preferred that their buildings be smoke-free. A failure to report problems to apartment managers might be an impediment to instituting smoke-free policies in apartment buildings. The considerable disagreement among residents within apartment complexes about the current official smoking policy in their buildings suggests that policies are lacking or are not well communicated.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (148.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson K. E., Carmella S. G., Ye M., Bliss R. L., Le C., Murphy L., Hecht S. S. Metabolites of a tobacco-specific lung carcinogen in nonsmoking women exposed to environmental tobacco smoke. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Mar 7;93(5):378–381. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.5.378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashley M. J., Ferrence R. Reducing children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in homes: issues and strategies. Tob Control. 1998 Spring;7(1):61–65. doi: 10.1136/tc.7.1.61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Borland R., Mullins R., Trotter L., White V. Trends in environmental tobacco smoke restrictions in the home in Victoria, Australia. Tob Control. 1999 Autumn;8(3):266–271. doi: 10.1136/tc.8.3.266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davis R. M. Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke: identifying and protecting those at risk. JAMA. 1998 Dec 9;280(22):1947–1949. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.22.1947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gilpin Elizabeth A., Farkas Arthur J., Emery Sherry L., Ake Christopher F., Pierce John P. Clean indoor air: advances in California, 1990-1999. Am J Public Health. 2002 May;92(5):785–791. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.5.785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hopkins D. P., Briss P. A., Ricard C. J., Husten C. G., Carande-Kulis V. G., Fielding J. E., Alao M. O., McKenna J. W., Sharp D. J., Harris J. R. Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Am J Prev Med. 2001 Feb;20(2 Suppl):16–66. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00297-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kline R. L. Smoke knows no boundaries: legal strategies for environmental tobacco smoke incursions into the home within multi-unit residential dwellings. Tob Control. 2000 Jun;9(2):201–205. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.2.201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Otsuka R., Watanabe H., Hirata K., Tokai K., Muro T., Yoshiyama M., Takeuchi K., Yoshikawa J. Acute effects of passive smoking on the coronary circulation in healthy young adults. JAMA. 2001 Jul 25;286(4):436–441. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.4.436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Poland B. D., Cohen J. E., Ashley M. J., Adlaf E., Ferrence R., Pederson L. L., Bull S. B., Raphael D. Heterogeneity among smokers and non-smokers in attitudes and behaviour regarding smoking and smoking restrictions. Tob Control. 2000 Dec;9(4):364–371. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.4.364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Willers S., Skarping G., Dalene M., Skerfving S. Urinary cotinine in children and adults during and after semiexperimental exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Arch Environ Health. 1995 Mar-Apr;50(2):130–138. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1995.9940890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES