Skip to main content
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2003 Sep;12(3):274–281. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.3.274

Impact of different aspects of social participation and social capital on smoking cessation among daily smokers: a longitudinal study

M Lindstrom 1, S Isacsson 1, S Elmstahl 1
PMCID: PMC1747740  PMID: 12958387

Abstract

Objective: To investigate differences in different aspects of social participation and social capital among baseline daily smokers that had remained daily smokers, become intermittent smokers, or stopped smoking at one year follow up.

Design/setting/participants/measurements: 12 507 individuals, aged 45–69 years, interviewed at baseline between 1992 and 1994 and at a one year follow up were investigated in this longitudinal study. The three groups of baseline daily smokers were compared to the reference population (baseline intermittent smokers and non-smokers) according to different aspects of social participation and social capital. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to assess differences in different aspects of social participation and social capital.

Results: The baseline daily smokers that remained daily smokers at the one year follow up had significantly increased odds ratios of non-participation in study circles in other places than at work, meeting of organisations other than unions, theatre/cinema, arts exhibition, church, sports events, large gatherings of relatives, and private parties compared to the reference population. The baseline daily smokers that had become intermittent smokers at the one year follow up had significantly increased odds ratios of non-participation in church services. The baseline daily smokers that had stopped smoking had increased odds ratios of non-participation in having attended a meeting of organisations other than labour unions during the past year, having been to a theatre or cinema, and of having visited an arts exhibition during the past year. All three categories of baseline daily smokers had significantly decreased odds ratios of non-participation in night club/entertainment.

Conclusions: The baseline daily smokers that had remained daily smokers at the one year follow up had particularly high rates of non-participation compared to the reference population in both activities specifically related to social capital, such as other study circles, meetings of organisations other than labour unions, and church attendance and cultural activities such as theatre/cinema and arts exhibition, although significantly lower participation in cultural activities and meetings of other organisations was also observed among daily smokers that had stopped smoking. All three baseline daily smoker groups had higher rates of having visited a night club during the past year.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (112.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baum F. E., Bush R. A., Modra C. C., Murray C. J., Cox E. M., Alexander K. M., Potter R. C. Epidemiology of participation: an Australian community study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Jun;54(6):414–423. doi: 10.1136/jech.54.6.414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berglund G., Elmstähl S., Janzon L., Larsson S. A. The Malmo Diet and Cancer Study. Design and feasibility. J Intern Med. 1993 Jan;233(1):45–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1993.tb00647.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boström G., Hallqvist J., Haglund B. J., Romelsjö A., Svanström L., Diderichsen F. Socioeconomic differences in smoking in an urban Swedish population. The bias introduced by non-participation in a mailed questionnaire. Scand J Soc Med. 1993 Jun;21(2):77–82. doi: 10.1177/140349489302100204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Criqui M. H., Barrett-Connor E., Austin M. Differences between respondents and non-respondents in a population-based cardiovascular disease study. Am J Epidemiol. 1978 Nov;108(5):367–372. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ektor-Andersen J., Isacsson S. O., Lindgren A., Orbaek P. The experience of pain from the shoulder-neck area related to the total body pain, self-experienced health and mental distress. The Malmö Shoulder-Neck Study group. Pain. 1999 Sep;82(3):289–295. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00053-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gulliver S. B., Hughes J. R., Solomon L. J., Dey A. N. An investigation of self-efficacy, partner support and daily stresses as predictors of relapse to smoking in self-quitters. Addiction. 1995 Jun;90(6):767–772. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1995.9067673.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hajek P., West R., Wilson J. Regular smokers, lifetime very light smokers, and reduced smokers: comparison of psychosocial and smoking characteristics in women. Health Psychol. 1995 May;14(3):195–201. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.14.3.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hennrikus D. J., Jeffery R. W., Lando H. A. Occasional smoking in a Minnesota working population. Am J Public Health. 1996 Sep;86(9):1260–1266. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.9.1260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. House J. S., Landis K. R., Umberson D. Social relationships and health. Science. 1988 Jul 29;241(4865):540–545. doi: 10.1126/science.3399889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jarvis M. J. A profile of tobacco smoking. Addiction. 1994 Nov;89(11):1371–1376. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1994.tb03732.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Johansson S. E., Konlaan B. B., Bygren L. O. Sustaining habits of attending cultural events and maintenance of health: a longitudinal study. Health Promot Int. 2001 Sep;16(3):229–234. doi: 10.1093/heapro/16.3.229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Konlaan B. B., Björby N., Bygren L. O., Weissglas G., Karlsson L. G., Widmark M. Attendance at cultural events and physical exercise and health: a randomized controlled study. Public Health. 2000 Sep;114(5):316–319. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Konlaan B. B., Bygren L. O., Johansson S. E. Visiting the cinema, concerts, museums or art exhibitions as determinant of survival: a Swedish fourteen-year cohort follow-up. Scand J Public Health. 2000 Sep;28(3):174–178. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lindström M., Hanson B. S., Ostergren P. O., Berglund G. Socioeconomic differences in smoking cessation: the role of social participation. Scand J Public Health. 2000 Sep;28(3):200–208. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lindström M., Isacsson S-O, Malmö Shoulder-Neck Study Group Long term and transitional intermittent smokers: a longitudinal study. Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11(1):61–67. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.1.61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lindström Martin, Isacsson Sven-Olof, Malmö Shoulder-Neck Study Group Smoking cessation among daily smokers, aged 45-69 years: a longitudinal study in Malmö, Sweden. Addiction. 2002 Feb;97(2):205–215. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00036.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lindström Martin. Social capital and the miniaturization of community among daily and intermittent smokers: a population-based study. Prev Med. 2003 Feb;36(2):177–184. doi: 10.1016/s0091-7435(02)00049-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lindström Martin, Sundquist Jan. Ethnic differences in daily smoking in Malmö, Sweden. Varying influence of psychosocial and economic factors. Eur J Public Health. 2002 Dec;12(4):287–294. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/12.4.287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Molarius A., Parsons R. W., Dobson A. J., Evans A., Fortmann S. P., Jamrozik K., Kuulasmaa K., Moltchanov V., Sans S., Tuomilehto J. Trends in cigarette smoking in 36 populations from the early 1980s to the mid-1990s: findings from the WHO MONICA Project. Am J Public Health. 2001 Feb;91(2):206–212. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.2.206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Murray R. P., Connett J. E., Lauger G. G., Voelker H. T. Error in smoking measures: effects of intervention on relations of cotinine and carbon monoxide to self-reported smoking. The Lung Health Study Research Group. Am J Public Health. 1993 Sep;83(9):1251–1257. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.9.1251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Owen N., Kent P., Wakefield M., Roberts L. Low-rate smokers. Prev Med. 1995 Jan;24(1):80–84. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1995.1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Peto R., Lopez A. D., Boreham J., Thun M., Heath C., Jr Mortality from tobacco in developed countries: indirect estimation from national vital statistics. Lancet. 1992 May 23;339(8804):1268–1278. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91600-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pomerleau O. F., Pomerleau C. S. Research on stress and smoking: progress and problems. Br J Addict. 1991 May;86(5):599–603. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01815.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sanders D., Peveler R., Mant D., Fowler G. Predictors of successful smoking cessation following advice from nurses in general practice. Addiction. 1993 Dec;88(12):1699–1705. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02045.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Steffensen F. H., Lauritzen T., Sørensen H. T. Validity of self-reported smoking habits. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1995 Sep;13(3):236–237. doi: 10.3109/02813439508996767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tate J. C., Pomerleau C. S., Pomerleau O. F. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological smoking motives: a replication and extension. Addiction. 1994 Mar;89(3):321–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1994.tb00899.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Verkerk P. H., Buitendijk S. E., Verloove-Vanhorick S. P. Differential misclassification of alcohol and cigarette consumption by pregnancy outcome. Int J Epidemiol. 1994 Dec;23(6):1218–1225. doi: 10.1093/ije/23.6.1218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wells A. J., English P. B., Posner S. F., Wagenknecht L. E., Perez-Stable E. J. Misclassification rates for current smokers misclassified as nonsmokers. Am J Public Health. 1998 Oct;88(10):1503–1509. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.10.1503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wersäll J. P., Eklund G. The decline of smoking among Swedish men. Int J Epidemiol. 1998 Feb;27(1):20–26. doi: 10.1093/ije/27.1.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES