Skip to main content
PMC home page
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2003 Sep;12(3):302–309. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.3.302

The St-Louis du Parc Heart Health Project: a critical analysis of the reverse effects on smoking

L Renaud 1, J O'Loughlin 1, V Dery 1
PMCID: PMC1747750  PMID: 12958393

Abstract

Objectives: Although some school based smoking prevention programmes have shown positive impacts, others have had only short term effects, no effects, and in some cases reverse effects. The St-Louis du Parc Heart Health Project was a five year heart health promotion programme targeting children in eight elementary schools aged 9–12 years in disadvantaged multiethnic neighbourhoods in Montreal. In a controlled, longitudinal evaluation, the programme produced reverse effects on smoking—children exposed to the programme were more likely to initiate and to continue smoking than control children. This article explores hypotheses to explain the reverse effects.

Design: Following work by an in-house committee, a consensus workshop with international experts was conducted to develop hypotheses to explain the reverse effects. This was complemented by an analysis of the programme's concordance with the standard guidelines on the school based prevention of tobacco use, and discussions with experts at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Results: The programme respected most standard guidelines for smoking prevention programmes with respect to content and mode of delivery. Hypotheses to explain the reverse effects include: an unfavourable environment characterised by strong pro-smoking models and resistance to environmental interventions; heightened sensitivity to smoking among children most exposed to the programme; defence mechanisms among children stimulated by cognitive dissonance or anxiety; unanticipated effects associated with the health educator who delivered the programme; inadequate attention in programme development to the diverse cultural origins of the population targeted; and intervention content inappropriately targeted to children's stages of cognitive development.

Conclusion: Elementary school based interventions should aim to develop a clear and coherent social norm about the non-use of tobacco, as a precursor to or in close conjunction with having children as their primary target. Programme design should take key student characteristics into consideration and ensure that the modes of communication are adapted to the targeted group's characteristics. Neighbourhood level interventions should be orchestrated to complement regional, provincial, and national programmes.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (129.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ambtman R., Madak P., Koss D., Strople M. J. Evaluation of a comprehensive elementary school curriculum-based drug education program. J Drug Educ. 1990;20(3):199–225. doi: 10.2190/7MXX-K123-1KQL-CHHC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Botvin G. J., Baker E., Dusenbury L., Botvin E. M., Diaz T. Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population. JAMA. 1995 Apr 12;273(14):1106–1112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Botvin G. J., Baker E., Filazzola A. D., Botvin E. M. A cognitive-behavioral approach to substance abuse prevention: one-year follow-up. Addict Behav. 1990;15(1):47–63. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(90)90006-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Botvin G. J., Sussman S., Biglan A. The Hutchinson Smoking Prevention Project: a lesson on inaccurate media coverage and the importance of prevention advocacy. Prev Sci. 2001 Jun;2(2):67–70. doi: 10.1023/a:1011500829657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown J. H., Kreft I. G. Zero effects of drug prevention programs: issues and solutions. Eval Rev. 1998 Feb;22(1):3–14. doi: 10.1177/0193841X9802200101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bruvold W. H. A meta-analysis of the California school-based risk reduction program. J Drug Educ. 1990;20(2):139–152. doi: 10.2190/7CRH-5R8T-MHR6-6UD7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bush P. J., Zuckerman A. E., Theiss P. K., Taggart V. S., Horowitz C., Sheridan M. J., Walter H. J. Cardiovascular risk factor prevention in black schoolchildren: two-year results of the "Know Your Body" program. Am J Epidemiol. 1989 Mar;129(3):466–482. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Effectiveness of school-based programs as a component of a statewide tobacco control initiative--Oregon, 1999-2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001 Aug 10;50(31):663–666. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohen D. A., Linton K. L. Parent participation in an adolescent drug abuse prevention program. J Drug Educ. 1995;25(2):159–169. doi: 10.2190/PCYV-NTFH-DY0V-EULY. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Damestoy N., Renaud L., Lampron G., Kishchuk N., Sylvestre M., O'Loughlin J., Perrault R. L'interdiction de la vente de tabac aux mineurs: une concertation est nécessaire. Can J Public Health. 1994 Mar-Apr;85(2):85–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dent C. W., Sussman S., Stacy A. W., Craig S., Burton D., Flay B. R. Two-year behavior outcomes of project towards no tobacco use. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1995 Aug;63(4):676–677. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.63.4.676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Donnelly J. E., Jacobsen D. J., Whatley J. E., Hill J. O., Swift L. L., Cherrington A., Polk B., Tran Z. V., Reed G. Nutrition and physical activity program to attenuate obesity and promote physical and metabolic fitness in elementary school children. Obes Res. 1996 May;4(3):229–243. doi: 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1996.tb00541.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dusenbury L., Falco M. Eleven components of effective drug abuse prevention curricula. J Sch Health. 1995 Dec;65(10):420–425. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1995.tb08205.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dusenbury L., Falco M., Lake A. A review of the evaluation of 47 drug abuse prevention curricula available nationally. J Sch Health. 1997 Apr;67(4):127–132. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1997.tb03431.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Elder J. P., Perry C. L., Stone E. J., Johnson C. C., Yang M., Edmundson E. W., Smyth M. H., Galati T., Feldman H., Cribb P. Tobacco use measurement, prediction, and intervention in elementary schools in four states: the CATCH Study. Prev Med. 1996 Jul-Aug;25(4):486–494. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1996.0080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ellickson P. L., Bell R. M. Drug prevention in junior high: a multi-site longitudinal test. Science. 1990 Mar 16;247(4948):1299–1305. doi: 10.1126/science.2180065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ellickson P. L., Bell R. M., McGuigan K. Preventing adolescent drug use: long-term results of a junior high program. Am J Public Health. 1993 Jun;83(6):856–861. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.6.856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Flynn B. S., Worden J. K., Secker-Walker R. H., Badger G. J., Geller B. M., Costanza M. C. Prevention of cigarette smoking through mass media intervention and school programs. Am J Public Health. 1992 Jun;82(6):827–834. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.6.827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Frohlich Katherine L., Potvin Louise, Chabot Patrick, Corin Ellen. A theoretical and empirical analysis of context: neighbourhoods, smoking and youth. Soc Sci Med. 2002 May;54(9):1401–1417. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00122-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Frohlich Katherine L., Potvin Louise, Gauvin Lise, Chabot Patrick. Youth smoking initiation: disentangling context from composition. Health Place. 2002 Sep;8(3):155–166. doi: 10.1016/s1353-8292(02)00003-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gilchrist L. D., Schinke S. P., Bobo J. K., Snow W. H. Self-control skills for preventing smoking. Addict Behav. 1986;11(2):169–174. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(86)90042-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Glynn T. J., Anderson D. M., Schwarz L. Tobacco-use reduction among high-risk youth: recommendations of a National Cancer Institute Expert Advisory Panel. Prev Med. 1991 Mar;20(2):279–291. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(91)90027-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Glynn T. J. Essential elements of school-based smoking prevention programs. J Sch Health. 1989 May;59(5):181–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1989.tb04698.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hamm N. H. Outcomes of the Minnesota Smoking Prevention Program. Psychol Rep. 1994 Oct;75(2):880–882. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1994.75.2.880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hawthorne G. The social impact of Life Education: estimating drug use prevalence among Victorian primary school students and the statewide effect of the Life Education programme. Addiction. 1996 Aug;91(8):1151–1159. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1996.91811517.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Killen J. D., Telch M. J., Robinson T. N., Maccoby N., Taylor C. B., Farquhar J. W. Cardiovascular disease risk reduction for tenth graders. A multiple-factor school-based approach. JAMA. 1988 Sep 23;260(12):1728–1733. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lantz P. M., Jacobson P. D., Warner K. E., Wasserman J., Pollack H. A., Berson J., Ahlstrom A. Investing in youth tobacco control: a review of smoking prevention and control strategies. Tob Control. 2000 Mar;9(1):47–63. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.1.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Moore L., Roberts C., Tudor-Smith C. School smoking policies and smoking prevalence among adolescents: multilevel analysis of cross-sectional data from Wales. Tob Control. 2001 Jun;10(2):117–123. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.2.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nutbeam D., Macaskill P., Smith C., Simpson J. M., Catford J. Evaluation of two school smoking education programmes under normal classroom conditions. BMJ. 1993 Jan 9;306(6870):102–107. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6870.102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. O'Loughlin J., Paradis G., Renaud L., Sanchez Gomez L. One-year predictors of smoking initiation and of continued smoking among elementary schoolchildren in multiethnic, low-income, inner-city neighbourhoods. Tob Control. 1998 Autumn;7(3):268–275. doi: 10.1136/tc.7.3.268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Perry C. L., Kelder S. H., Murray D. M., Klepp K. I. Communitywide smoking prevention: long-term outcomes of the Minnesota Heart Health Program and the Class of 1989 Study. Am J Public Health. 1992 Sep;82(9):1210–1216. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.9.1210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Peterson A. V., Jr, Kealey K. A., Mann S. L., Marek P. M., Sarason I. G. Hutchinson Smoking Prevention Project: long-term randomized trial in school-based tobacco use prevention--results on smoking. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Dec 20;92(24):1979–1991. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.24.1979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Pinilla J., González B., Barber P., Santana Y. Smoking in young adolescents: an approach with multilevel discrete choice models. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Mar;56(3):227–232. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.3.227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Price J. H., Beach P., Everett S., Telljohann S. K., Lewis L. Evaluation of a three-year urban elementary school tobacco prevention program. J Sch Health. 1998 Jan;68(1):26–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1998.tb03483.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Puska P., Vartiainen E., Pallonen U., Salonen J. T., Pöyhiä P., Koskela K., McAlister A. The North Karelia youth project: evaluation of two years of intervention on health behavior and CVD risk factors among 13- to 15-year old children. Prev Med. 1982 Sep;11(5):550–570. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(82)90068-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Renaud L., Chevalier S., Dufour R., O'Loughlin J., Beaudet N., Bourgeois A., Ouellet D. Evaluation de l'implantation d'un curriculum scolaire: Pistes d'interventions pour optimiser l'adoption et l'implantation de programmes d'éducation à la santé dans les écoles primaires. Can J Public Health. 1997 Sep-Oct;88(5):351–353. doi: 10.1007/BF03403904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Renaud L., O'Loughlin J., Paradis G., Chevalier S. Un programme de promotion de la santé cardiovasculaire auprès des 9-12 ans et de la communauté Saint-Louis du Parc/Québec. Sante Publique. 1998 Dec;10(4):425–445. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Rundall T. G., Bruvold W. H. A meta-analysis of school-based smoking and alcohol use prevention programs. Health Educ Q. 1988 Fall;15(3):317–334. doi: 10.1177/109019818801500306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Santi S. M., Best J. A., Payne M. E., Brown K. S., Cameron R. A comparison between instructional experience and performance of teachers and nurses delivering a smoking prevention program. Can J Public Health. 1992 Nov-Dec;83(6):433–436. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Schaps E., Moskowitz J. M., Malvin J. H., Schaeffer G. A. Evaluation of seven school-based prevention programs: a final report on the Napa project. Int J Addict. 1986 Sep-Oct;21(9-10):1081–1112. doi: 10.3109/10826088609077256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Secker-Walker R. H., Worden J. K., Holland R. R., Flynn B. S., Detsky A. S. A mass media programme to prevent smoking among adolescents: costs and cost effectiveness. Tob Control. 1997 Autumn;6(3):207–212. doi: 10.1136/tc.6.3.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Smith D. W., McCormick L. K., Steckler A. B., McLeroy K. R. Teachers' use of health curricula: implementation of growing healthy, project SMART, and the teenage health teaching modules. J Sch Health. 1993 Oct;63(8):349–354. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1993.tb07151.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Vandongen R., Jenner D. A., Thompson C., Taggart A. C., Spickett E. E., Burke V., Beilin L. J., Milligan R. A., Dunbar D. L. A controlled evaluation of a fitness and nutrition intervention program on cardiovascular health in 10- to 12-year-old children. Prev Med. 1995 Jan;24(1):9–22. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1995.1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wallace S. A critique of Hawthorne et al.'s evaluation of life education. Addiction. 1996 Feb;91(2):286–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1996.tb03191.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Walter H. J., Vaughan R. D., Wynder E. L. Primary prevention of cancer among children: changes in cigarette smoking and diet after six years of intervention. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989 Jul 5;81(13):995–999. doi: 10.1093/jnci/81.13.995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Wheller R. Evaluating the evaluators: a reply to Hawthorne et al. Addiction. 1995 Feb;90(2):293–294. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1995.tb01050.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Worden J. K., Flynn B. S., Solomon L. J., Secker-Walker R. H., Badger G. J., Carpenter J. H. Using mass media to prevent cigarette smoking among adolescent girls. Health Educ Q. 1996 Nov;23(4):453–468. doi: 10.1177/109019819602300406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES