Skip to main content
PMC home page
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2003 Sep;12(3):264–268. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.3.264

British Columbia capital regional district 100% smokefree bylaw: a successful public health campaign despite industry opposition

J Drope 1, S Glantz 1
PMCID: PMC1747755  PMID: 12958385

Abstract

Objective: To describe how the British Columbia Capital Regional District successfully passed, implemented, and enforced a 100% smokefree bylaw in all public places, including restaurants and bars, despite an aggressive campaign by the tobacco industry (acting through the hospitality industry) to stop it.

Methods: Information was obtained from news reports, internal tobacco industry documents, reports, public documents, and interviews with key players. Tobacco industry documents were accessed between February and April 2002. This project was approved by the University of California San Francisco committee on human research.

Results: As in the USA and elsewhere in the world, the tobacco industry in British Columbia, Canada, recruited and created hospitality associations to fight against the district smokefree bylaw. They used the classic industry rhetoric of individual rights and freedoms, economic devastation, and ventilation as a solution. Public health authorities were able to counter industry strategies with a strong education campaign, well written bylaws, and persistent enforcement.

Conclusion: It is possible to overcome serious opposition orchestrated by the tobacco industry and develop and implement a 100% smokefree bylaw in Canada. Doing so requires attention to detail in drafting the bylaw, as well as a public education campaign on the health dangers of secondhand smoke and active enforcement to overcome organised resistance to the bylaw. Jurisdictions considering smokefree bylaws should anticipate this opposition when developing and implementing their bylaws.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (101.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bero L. A., Montini T., Bryan-Jones K., Mangurian C. Science in regulatory policy making: case studies in the development of workplace smoking restrictions. Tob Control. 2001 Dec;10(4):329–336. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.4.329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dearlove J. V., Bialous S. A., Glantz S. A. Tobacco industry manipulation of the hospitality industry to maintain smoking in public places. Tob Control. 2002 Jun;11(2):94–104. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.2.94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dearlove J. V., Bialous S. A., Glantz S. A. Tobacco industry manipulation of the hospitality industry to maintain smoking in public places. Tob Control. 2002 Jun;11(2):94–104. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.2.94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dearlove Joanna V., Glantz Stanton A. Boards of Health as venues for clean indoor air policy making. Am J Public Health. 2002 Feb;92(2):257–265. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.2.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Drope J., Chapman S. Tobacco industry efforts at discrediting scientific knowledge of environmental tobacco smoke: a review of internal industry documents. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Aug;55(8):588–594. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.8.588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fichtenberg Caroline M., Glantz Stanton A. Effect of smoke-free workplaces on smoking behaviour: systematic review. BMJ. 2002 Jul 27;325(7357):188–188. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7357.188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Glantz S. A., Smith L. R. The effect of ordinances requiring smoke-free restaurants on restaurant sales. Am J Public Health. 1994 Jul;84(7):1081–1085. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.7.1081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Macdonald H. R., Glantz S. A. Political realities of statewide smoking legislation: the passage of California's Assembly Bill 13. Tob Control. 1997 Spring;6(1):41–54. doi: 10.1136/tc.6.1.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Magzamen S., Charlesworth A., Glantz S. A. Print media coverage of California's smokefree bar law. Tob Control. 2001 Jun;10(2):154–160. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.2.154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Magzamen S., Glantz S. A. The new battleground: California's experience with smoke-free bars. Am J Public Health. 2001 Feb;91(2):245–252. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.2.245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Montini T., Bero L. A. Policy makers' perspectives on tobacco control advocates' roles in regulation development. Tob Control. 2001 Sep;10(3):218–224. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.3.218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ritch W. A., Begay M. E. Strange bedfellows: the history of collaboration between the Massachusetts Restaurant Association and the tobacco industry. Am J Public Health. 2001 Apr;91(4):598–603. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.4.598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Samuels B., Glantz S. A. The politics of local tobacco control. JAMA. 1991 Oct 16;266(15):2110–2117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Samuels B., Glantz S. A. The politics of local tobacco control. JAMA. 1991 Oct 16;266(15):2110–2117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Scollo M., Lal A., Hyland A., Glantz S. Review of the quality of studies on the economic effects of smoke-free policies on the hospitality industry. Tob Control. 2003 Mar;12(1):13–20. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.1.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Traynor M. P., Begay M. E., Glantz S. A. New tobacco industry strategy to prevent local tobacco control. JAMA. 1993 Jul 28;270(4):479–486. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES