Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2003 Dec;12(4):e4. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.4.e4

Tobacco use in India: prevalence and predictors of smoking and chewing in a national cross sectional household survey

M Rani, S Bonu, P Jha, S Nguyen, L Jamjoum
PMCID: PMC1747786  PMID: 14660785

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the prevalence and the socioeconomic and demographic correlates of tobacco consumption in India.

Design: Cross sectional, nationally representative population based household survey.

Subjects: 315 598 individuals 15 years or older from 91 196 households were sampled in National Family Health Survey-2 (1998–99). Data on tobacco consumption were elicited from household informants.

Measures and methods: Prevalence of current smoking and current chewing of tobacco were used as outcome measures. Simple and two way cross tabulations and multivariate logistic regression analysis were the main analytical methods.

Results: Thirty per cent of the population 15 years or older—47% men and 14% of women—either smoked or chewed tobacco, which translates to almost 195 million people—154 million men and 41million women in India. However, the prevalence may be underestimated by almost 11% and 1.5% for chewing tobacco among men and women, respectively, and by 5% and 0.5% for smoking among men and women, respectively, because of use of household informants. Tobacco consumption was significantly higher in poor, less educated, scheduled castes and scheduled tribe populations. The prevalence of tobacco consumption increased up to the age of 50 years and then levelled or declined. The prevalence of smoking and chewing also varied widely between different states and had a strong association with individual's sociocultural characteristics.

Conclusion: The findings of the study highlight that an agenda to improve health outcomes among the poor in India must include effective interventions to control tobacco use. Failure to do so would most likely result in doubling the burden of diseases—both communicable and non-communicable—among India's teeming poor. There is a need for periodical surveys using more consistent definitions of tobacco use and eliciting information on different types of tobacco consumed. The study also suggests a need to adjust the prevalence estimates based on household informants

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (452.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dikshit R. P., Kanhere S. Tobacco habits and risk of lung, oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancer: a population-based case-control study in Bhopal, India. Int J Epidemiol. 2000 Aug;29(4):609–614. doi: 10.1093/ije/29.4.609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Franceschi S., Bidoli E., Herrero R., Muñoz N. Comparison of cancers of the oral cavity and pharynx worldwide: etiological clues. Oral Oncol. 2000 Jan;36(1):106–115. doi: 10.1016/s1368-8375(99)00070-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gupta P. C. Survey of sociodemographic characteristics of tobacco use among 99,598 individuals in Bombay, India using handheld computers. Tob Control. 1996 Summer;5(2):114–120. doi: 10.1136/tc.5.2.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gupta R., Prakash H., Gupta V. P., Gupta K. D. Prevalence and determinants of coronary heart disease in a rural population of India. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Feb;50(2):203–209. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00281-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gupta R., Prakash H., Gupta V. P., Gupta K. D. Prevalence and determinants of coronary heart disease in a rural population of India. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Feb;50(2):203–209. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00281-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jha Prabhat, Ranson M. Kent, Nguyen Son N., Yach Derek. Estimates of global and regional smoking prevalence in 1995, by age and sex. Am J Public Health. 2002 Jun;92(6):1002–1006. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.6.1002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kutty V. R., Balakrishnan K. G., Jayasree A. K., Thomas J. Prevalence of coronary heart disease in the rural population of Thiruvananthapuram district, Kerala, India. Int J Cardiol. 1993 Apr;39(1):59–70. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(93)90297-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Malson J. L., Sims K., Murty R., Pickworth W. B. Comparison of the nicotine content of tobacco used in bidis and conventional cigarettes. Tob Control. 2001 Jun;10(2):181–183. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.2.181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mohan Davinder, Neufeld Karin, Chopra A., Sethi H. Agreement between head of household informant and self-report in a community survey of substance use in India. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003 Jan 24;69(1):87–94. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(02)00247-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Moore S. R., Johnson N. W., Pierce A. M., Wilson D. F. The epidemiology of tongue cancer: a review of global incidence. Oral Dis. 2000 Mar;6(2):75–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2000.tb00105.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Narayan K. M., Chadha S. L., Hanson R. L., Tandon R., Shekhawat S., Fernandes R. J., Gopinath N. Prevalence and patterns of smoking in Delhi: cross sectional study. BMJ. 1996 Jun 22;312(7046):1576–1579. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7046.1576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Padmavati S. Prevention of heart disease in India in the 21st century: need for a concerted effort. Indian Heart J. 2002 Jan-Feb;54(1):99–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES