Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2004 Sep;13(3):283–288. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.006403

The impact of anti-tobacco industry prevention messages in tobacco producing regions: evidence from the US truth® campaign

J Thrasher 1, J Niederdeppe 1, M Farrelly 1, K Davis 1, K Ribisl 1, M Haviland 1
PMCID: PMC1747883  PMID: 15333885

Abstract

Background: Adolescents who live in tobacco producing regions may not respond favourably to anti-industry ads.

Objective: To examine whether state level involvement in tobacco production appears to limit the effectiveness of anti-industry ads to prevent tobacco use among adolescents in the USA.

Design: Time trend analyses were done using repeated cross sectional data from six waves of the Legacy Media Tracking Survey, which were collected between 1999 and 2003.

Setting and participants: 28 307 adolescents, ages 12–17 years, were classified as living in: tobacco producing states (TPS) (n = 1929); non-tobacco producing states (non-TPS) with low tobacco control funding comparable to TPS (n = 5323); non-TPS with relatively high funding (n = 15 076); and non-TPS with established anti-industry ad campaigns (n = 5979).

Main outcome measures: Reactions to anti-industry ads; strength of anti-industry attitudes/beliefs; changes in anti-industry attitudes/beliefs over time.

Results: Ad reactions did not differ by state type. Multivariate adjusted time trend analyses indicated significant, comparable increases in anti-industry attitudes/beliefs since the onset of the truth® campaign, in both TPS and non-TPS. Mediation analyses indicated that these increases were due, in part, to campaign exposure.

Conclusions: Adolescents who live in tobacco producing regions appear to be as responsive to anti-industry ads as their counterparts in non-tobacco producing regions. This study provides further evidence for the effectiveness of such ads.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (101.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altman D. G., Levine D. W., Howard G., Hamilton H. Tobacco farmers and diversification: opportunities and barriers. Tob Control. 1996 Autumn;5(3):192–198. doi: 10.1136/tc.5.3.192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Balbach E. D., Glantz S. A. Tobacco control advocates must demand high-quality media campaigns: the California experience. Tob Control. 1998 Winter;7(4):397–408. doi: 10.1136/tc.7.4.397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bauer U. E., Johnson T. M., Hopkins R. S., Brooks R. G. Changes in youth cigarette use and intentions following implementation of a tobacco control program: findings from the Florida Youth Tobacco Survey, 1998-2000. JAMA. 2000 Aug 9;284(6):723–728. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.6.723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chaloupka F. J., Wechsler H. Price, tobacco control policies and smoking among young adults. J Health Econ. 1997 Jun;16(3):359–373. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(96)00530-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Conlisk E., Malek S. H. Results from the 1999 North Carolina Youth Tobacco Survey. A call to action. N C Med J. 2001 Sep-Oct;62(5):256–259. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Farrelly Matthew C., Healton Cheryl G., Davis Kevin C., Messeri Peter, Hersey James C., Haviland M. Lyndon. Getting to the truth: evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns. Am J Public Health. 2002 Jun;92(6):901–907. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.6.901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Farrelly Matthew C., Pechacek Terry F., Chaloupka Frank J. The impact of tobacco control program expenditures on aggregate cigarette sales: 1981-2000. J Health Econ. 2003 Sep;22(5):843–859. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(03)00057-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Flay B. R., Hu F. B., Richardson J. Psychosocial predictors of different stages of cigarette smoking among high school students. Prev Med. 1998 Sep-Oct;27(5 Pt 3):A9–18. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Goldman L. K., Glantz S. A. Evaluation of antismoking advertising campaigns. JAMA. 1998 Mar 11;279(10):772–777. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.10.772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hahn E. J., Toumey C. P., Rayens M. K., McCoy C. A. Kentucky legislators' views on tobacco policy. Am J Prev Med. 1999 Feb;16(2):81–88. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00134-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Higgins C. W., Whitley K. N., Dunn J. D. A comparison of smoking related attitudes and behaviors among Kentucky public school children whose families are and are not involved in tobacco production. J Sch Health. 1984 May;54(5):185–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1984.tb08813.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Leventhal H., Cleary P. D. The smoking problem: a review of the research and theory in behavioral risk modification. Psychol Bull. 1980 Sep;88(2):370–405. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.88.2.370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Malek Sally Herndon, Hopkins David P., Molloy Meg, McGloin Tim. The public health challenge of youth smoking in North Carolina. Putting what we know into practice. N C Med J. 2002 May-Jun;63(3):153–161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Murphy N. T., Price C. J. The influence of self-esteem, parental smoking, and living in a tobacco production region on adolescent smoking behaviors. J Sch Health. 1988 Dec;58(10):401–405. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1988.tb05814.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Niederdeppe Jeff, Farrelly Matthew C., Haviland M. Lyndon. Confirming "truth": more evidence of a successful tobacco countermarketing campaign in Florida. Am J Public Health. 2004 Feb;94(2):255–257. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.2.255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Noland M. P., Kryscio R. J., Hinkle J., Riggs R. S., Linville L. H., Ford V. Y., Tucker T. C. Relationship of personal tobacco-raising, parental smoking, and other factors to tobacco use among adolescents living in a tobacco-producing region. Addict Behav. 1996 May-Jun;21(3):349–361. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(95)00063-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Noland M. P., Kryscio R. J., Riggs R. S., Linville L. H., Perritt L. J., Tucker T. C. Use of snuff, chewing tobacco, and cigarettes among adolescents in a tobacco-producing area. Addict Behav. 1990;15(6):517–530. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(90)90052-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. O'Connell Peg. Tobacco control in the land of the golden leaf. Has political perception kept pace with reality? N C Med J. 2002 May-Jun;63(3):175–176. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pechmann C., Reibling E. T. Anti-smoking advertising campaigns targeting youth: case studies from USA and Canada. Tob Control. 2000;9 (Suppl 2):II18–II31. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.suppl_2.ii18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pierce J. P., Choi W. S., Gilpin E. A., Farkas A. J., Merritt R. K. Validation of susceptibility as a predictor of which adolescents take up smoking in the United States. Health Psychol. 1996 Sep;15(5):355–361. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.15.5.355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Popham W. J., Potter L. D., Hetrick M. A., Muthén L. K., Duerr J. M., Johnson M. D. Effectiveness of the California 1990-1991 tobacco education media campaign. Am J Prev Med. 1994 Nov-Dec;10(6):319–326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rose G. Sick individuals and sick populations. Int J Epidemiol. 1985 Mar;14(1):32–38. doi: 10.1093/ije/14.1.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rosen Richard J., Willson Charles F. The case for increasing North Carolina's cigarette excise tax. N C Med J. 2002 May-Jun;63(3):173–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Siegel M., Biener L. The impact of an antismoking media campaign on progression to established smoking: results of a longitudinal youth study. Am J Public Health. 2000 Mar;90(3):380–386. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.3.380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sly D. F., Heald G. R., Ray S. The Florida "truth" anti-tobacco media evaluation: design, first year results, and implications for planning future state media evaluations. Tob Control. 2001 Mar;10(1):9–15. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.1.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sly D. F., Heald G., Hopkins R. S., Moore T. W., McCloskey M., Ray S. The industry manipulation attitudes of smokers and nonsmokers. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2000 May;6(3):49–56. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200006030-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sly D. F., Hopkins R. S., Trapido E., Ray S. Influence of a counteradvertising media campaign on initiation of smoking: the Florida "truth" campaign. Am J Public Health. 2001 Feb;91(2):233–238. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.2.233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sly David F., Trapido Ed, Ray Sarah. Evidence of the dose effects of an antitobacco counteradvertising campaign. Prev Med. 2002 Nov;35(5):511–518. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2002.1100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wakefield M., Durrant R., Terry-McElrath Y., Ruel E., Balch G. I., Anderson S., Szczypka G., Emery S., Flay B. Appraisal of anti-smoking advertising by youth at risk for regular smoking: a comparative study in the United States, Australia, and Britain. Tob Control. 2003 Sep;12 (Suppl 2):ii82–ii86. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.suppl_2.ii82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wilson R. W., Higgins C. W. Smoking behavior and the tobacco crop. J Sch Health. 1984 Oct;54(9):343–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1984.tb09746.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES