Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2004 Sep;13(3):258–263. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.006056

Recent trends in home and work smoking bans

D Levy 1, E Romano 1, E Mumford 1
PMCID: PMC1747888  PMID: 15333881

Abstract

Objectives: Home and work smoking bans at the national and state level in the USA, and their relation to smoking prevalence and to tobacco control policies, are examined.

Data: The Current Population Survey's 1992/93 and 1998/99 tobacco use supplement surveys are the primary data source, supplemented with information on state level tobacco control policies.

Methods: The national and state rate of bans are estimated, and changes over the course of the 1990s and their relation to smoking rates and tobacco control policies are examined.

Results: The prevalence of work and home bans has increased considerably between 1992/93 and 1998/99. By 1999, over 65% of the population age 15 and above work in places with smoking bans, and over 60% live in homes with bans. We found that states with lower than average ban rates in 1993 tended to have had larger increases in ban rates between 1993 and 1999. We also found that home and work bans became more prevalent in states with initially low smoking rates, and that the growth in home bans coincided with a declining prevalence of smoking. States with higher levels of bans by 1999 also tended to have higher cigarette taxes, stricter clean air laws, and media/comprehensive campaigns in place.

Conclusions: The results indicate that lower smoking rates are associated with higher rates of work and home bans, although substantial progress has also been made by those states with initially low rates of bans. While further work is needed to establish the direction of causality, it would appear that reductions in smoking rates, either through stronger tobacco control policies or otherwise, may reduce exposure to tobacco smoke not only by reducing the number of smokers, but also through increasing the number of firms and homes with smoking restrictions.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (74.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Biener L., Cullen D., Di Z. X., Hammond S. K. Household smoking restrictions and adolescents' exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Prev Med. 1997 May-Jun;26(3):358–363. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1997.0152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Borland R., Mullins R., Trotter L., White V. Trends in environmental tobacco smoke restrictions in the home in Victoria, Australia. Tob Control. 1999 Autumn;8(3):266–271. doi: 10.1136/tc.8.3.266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brownson R. C., Eriksen M. P., Davis R. M., Warner K. E. Environmental tobacco smoke: health effects and policies to reduce exposure. Annu Rev Public Health. 1997;18:163–185. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.18.1.163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chriqui J. F., Frosh M., Brownson R. C., Shelton D. M., Sciandra R. C., Hobart R., Fisher P. H., el Arculli R., Alciati M. H. Application of a rating system to state clean indoor air laws (USA). Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11(1):26–34. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.1.26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Farkas A. J., Gilpin E. A., Distefan J. M., Pierce J. P. The effects of household and workplace smoking restrictions on quitting behaviours. Tob Control. 1999 Autumn;8(3):261–265. doi: 10.1136/tc.8.3.261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Farrelly M. C., Evans W. N., Sfekas A. E. The impact of workplace smoking bans: results from a national survey. Tob Control. 1999 Autumn;8(3):272–277. doi: 10.1136/tc.8.3.272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kegler Michelle C., Malcoe Lorraine Halinka. Smoking restrictions in the home and car among rural Native American and white families with young children. Prev Med. 2002 Oct;35(4):334–342. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2002.1091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Levy D. T., Cummings K. M., Hyland A. Increasing taxes as a strategy to reduce cigarette use and deaths: results of a simulation model. Prev Med. 2000 Sep;31(3):279–286. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Levy D. T., Friend K. A computer simulation model of mass media interventions directed at tobacco use. Prev Med. 2001 Mar;32(3):284–294. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Levy D. T., Friend K., Polishchuk E. Effect of clean indoor air laws on smokers: the clean air module of the SimSmoke computer simulation model. Tob Control. 2001 Dec;10(4):345–351. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.4.345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Levy David T., Friend Karen B. The effects of clean indoor air laws: what do we know and what do we need to know? Health Educ Res. 2003 Oct;18(5):592–609. doi: 10.1093/her/cyf045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Moskowitz J. M., Lin Z., Hudes E. S. The impact of California's smoking ordinances on worksite smoking policy and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Am J Health Promot. 1999 May-Jun;13(5):278-81, iii. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-13.5.278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Norman G. J., Ribisl K. M., Howard-Pitney B., Howard K. A., Unger J. B. The relationship between home smoking bans and exposure to state tobacco control efforts and smoking behaviors. Am J Health Promot. 2000 Nov-Dec;15(2):81–88. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-15.2.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pizacani Barbara A., Martin Diane P., Stark Michael J., Koepsell Thomas D., Thompson Beti, Diehr Paula. Household smoking bans: which households have them and do they work? Prev Med. 2003 Jan;36(1):99–107. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2002.1123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Shopland D. R., Gerlach K. K., Burns D. M., Hartman A. M., Gibson J. T. State-specific trends in smoke-free workplace policy coverage: the current population survey tobacco use supplement, 1993 to 1999. J Occup Environ Med. 2001 Aug;43(8):680–686. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200108000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Stillman F., Hartman A., Graubard B., Gilpin E., Chavis D., Garcia J., Wun L. M., Lynn L., Manley M. The American Stop Smoking Intervention Study. Conceptual framework and evaluation design. Eval Rev. 1999 Jun;23(3):259–280. doi: 10.1177/0193841X9902300301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wakefield M. A., Chaloupka F. J., Kaufman N. J., Orleans C. T., Barker D. C., Ruel E. E. Effect of restrictions on smoking at home, at school, and in public places on teenage smoking: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2000 Aug 5;321(7257):333–337. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7257.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wakefield M., Banham D., Martin J., Ruffin R., McCaul K., Badcock N. Restrictions on smoking at home and urinary cotinine levels among children with asthma. Am J Prev Med. 2000 Oct;19(3):188–192. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00197-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES