Skip to main content
PMC home page
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2004 Sep;13(3):268–276. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.007484

Hedging their bets: tobacco and gambling industries work against smoke-free policies

L Mandel 1, S Glantz 1
PMCID: PMC1747893  PMID: 15333883

Abstract

Objective: To describe and understand the relationship between the tobacco and gambling industries in connection to their collaborative efforts to prevent smoke-free casinos and gambling facilities and fight smoke-free policies generally.

Methods: Analysis of tobacco industry documents available online (accessed between February and December 2003).

Results: The tobacco industry has worked to convince the gambling industry to fight against smoke-free environments. Representatives of the gambling industry with ties to the tobacco industry oppose smoke-free workplaces by claiming that smoke-free environments hurt gambling revenue and by promoting ventilation as a solution to secondhand smoke. With help from the tobacco industry, the gambling industry has become a force at the American Society of Heating Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers opposing smoke-free ventilation standards for the hospitality industry.

Conclusion: Tobacco industry strategies to mobilise the gambling industry to oppose smoke-free environments are consistent with past strategies to co-opt the hospitality industry and with strategies to influence policy from behind the scenes. Tobacco control advocates need to be aware of the connections between the tobacco and gambling industries in relation to smoke-free environments and work to expose them to the public and to policy makers.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (97.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barnoya J., Glantz S. Tobacco industry success in preventing regulation of secondhand smoke in Latin America: the "Latin Project". Tob Control. 2002 Dec;11(4):305–314. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.4.305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bialous S. Aguinaga, Glantz S. A. ASHRAE Standard 62: tobacco industry's influence over national ventilation standards. Tob Control. 2002 Dec;11(4):315–328. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.4.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bryan-Jones Katherine, Bero Lisa A. Tobacco industry efforts to defeat the occupational safety and health administration indoor air quality rule. Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):585–592. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.4.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dearlove J. V., Bialous S. A., Glantz S. A. Tobacco industry manipulation of the hospitality industry to maintain smoking in public places. Tob Control. 2002 Jun;11(2):94–104. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.2.94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dearlove Joanna V., Glantz Stanton A. Boards of Health as venues for clean indoor air policy making. Am J Public Health. 2002 Feb;92(2):257–265. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.2.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Drope J., Bialous S. A., Glantz S. A. Tobacco industry efforts to present ventilation as an alternative to smoke-free environments in North America. Tob Control. 2004 Mar;13 (Suppl 1):i41–i47. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.004101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Drope J., Chapman S. Tobacco industry efforts at discrediting scientific knowledge of environmental tobacco smoke: a review of internal industry documents. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Aug;55(8):588–594. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.8.588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Drope J., Glantz S. British Columbia capital regional district 100% smokefree bylaw: a successful public health campaign despite industry opposition. Tob Control. 2003 Sep;12(3):264–268. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.3.264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Givel M. S., Glantz S. A. Tobacco lobby political influence on US state legislatures in the 1990s. Tob Control. 2001 Jun;10(2):124–134. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.2.124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Givel Michael, Glantz Stanton A. The "global settlement" with the tobacco industry: 6 years later. Am J Public Health. 2004 Feb;94(2):218–224. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.2.218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Glantz S. A. Achieving a smokefree society. Circulation. 1987 Oct;76(4):746–752. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.76.4.746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Glantz S. A., Wilson-Loots R. No association of smoke-free ordinances with profits from bingo and charitable games in Massachusetts. Tob Control. 2003 Dec;12(4):411–413. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.4.411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hall Nigel F., Gale Catharine R. Prevention of age related macular degeneration. BMJ. 2002 Jul 6;325(7354):1–2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7354.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Harper Todd, Martin Jane. Trojan horses: how the tobacco industry infiltrates the smokefree debate in Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2002 Dec;26(6):572–573. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2002.tb00369.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Malone R. E., Balbach E. D. Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire? Tob Control. 2000 Sep;9(3):334–338. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.3.334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Muggli M. E., Forster J. L., Hurt R. D., Repace J. L. The smoke you don't see: uncovering tobacco industry scientific strategies aimed against environmental tobacco smoke policies. Am J Public Health. 2001 Sep;91(9):1419–1423. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.9.1419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Muggli Monique E., Hurt Richard D., Blanke D. Douglas. Science for hire: a tobacco industry strategy to influence public opinion on secondhand smoke. Nicotine Tob Res. 2003 Jun;5(3):303–314. doi: 10.1080/1462220031000094169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ritch W. A., Begay M. E. Strange bedfellows: the history of collaboration between the Massachusetts Restaurant Association and the tobacco industry. Am J Public Health. 2001 Apr;91(4):598–603. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.4.598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Samuels B., Glantz S. A. The politics of local tobacco control. JAMA. 1991 Oct 16;266(15):2110–2117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Scollo M., Lal A., Hyland A., Glantz S. Review of the quality of studies on the economic effects of smoke-free policies on the hospitality industry. Tob Control. 2003 Mar;12(1):13–20. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.1.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Siegel M., Carol J., Jordan J., Hobart R., Schoenmarklin S., DuMelle F., Fisher P. Preemption in tobacco control. Review of an emerging public health problem. JAMA. 1997 Sep 10;278(10):858–863. doi: 10.1001/jama.278.10.858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Traynor M. P., Begay M. E., Glantz S. A. New tobacco industry strategy to prevent local tobacco control. JAMA. 1993 Jul 28;270(4):479–486. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Trotter L., Chapman S. "Conclusions about exposure to ETS and health that will be unhelpful to us": how the tobacco industry attempted to delay and discredit the 1997 Australian National Health and Medical Research Council report on passive smoking. Tob Control. 2003 Dec;12 (Suppl 3):iii102–iii106. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.suppl_3.iii102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tsoukalas Theodore, Glantz Stanton A. The Duluth clean indoor air ordinance: problems and success in fighting the tobacco industry at the local level in the 21st century. Am J Public Health. 2003 Aug;93(8):1214–1221. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.8.1214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES