Abstract
Objectives: To test: (1) whether citation under the Minors in Possession (MIP) law, vicarious citation (knowing someone who was cited), and threat of driving licence suspension are associated with decreased intentions to smoke next year; and (2) whether the policy is differentially enforced.
Subjects: 28 249 white, Hispanic, and African American students in grades 6–12 (11–18 years old) participated in the study.
Method: The 86 item anonymous Texas Youth Tobacco Survey was completed by students attending 37 schools in 14 east and central Texas communities.
Results: Hierarchical linear modelling showed that MIP citation was unrelated to the future smoking intentions of most youth. However, there was a negative association between citation and smoking intentions for ever daily smoking youth at four schools. Threat of licence suspension was associated with a lower likelihood of future smoking intentions among ever daily smoking youth and vicarious citation did not deter youth from future smoking. African American and Hispanic youth had a higher probability of being cited than their peers.
Conclusions: Threat of driving licence suspension has the intended effect upon youth who are/were committed smokers and MIP citation has the intended effect upon committed smokers at only four schools. However, differential enforcement of the law based on ethnicity may be occurring. Before drawing firm conclusions, current findings must be replicated with longitudinal data to determine the consequences of citation on subsequent tobacco use.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (162.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Downs W. R., Robertson J. F., Harrison L. R. Control theory, labeling theory, and the delivery of services for drug abuse to adolescents. Adolescence. 1997 Spring;32(125):1–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jason L. A., Berk M., Schnopp-Wyatt D. L., Talbot B. Effects of enforcement of youth access laws on smoking prevalence. Am J Community Psychol. 1999 Apr;27(2):143–160. doi: 10.1023/A:1022831617055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jason L. A., Katz R., Pokorny S. B., Engstrom M., Tegart G., Curie C. The relationship between youth tobacco control enforcement and crime rates in a midwestern county. Am J Health Promot. 2000 Mar-Apr;14(4):229-31, iii. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-14.4.229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lantz P. M., Jacobson P. D., Warner K. E., Wasserman J., Pollack H. A., Berson J., Ahlstrom A. Investing in youth tobacco control: a review of smoking prevention and control strategies. Tob Control. 2000 Mar;9(1):47–63. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.1.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ling P. M., Landman A., Glantz S. A. It is time to abandon youth access tobacco programmes. Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11(1):3–6. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.1.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Livingood W. C., Woodhouse C. D., Sayre J. J., Wludyka P. Impact study of tobacco possession law enforcement in Florida. Health Educ Behav. 2001 Dec;28(6):733–748. doi: 10.1177/109019810102800606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moore L., Roberts C., Tudor-Smith C. School smoking policies and smoking prevalence among adolescents: multilevel analysis of cross-sectional data from Wales. Tob Control. 2001 Jun;10(2):117–123. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.2.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pentz M. A., Sussman S., Newman T. The conflict between least harm and no-use tobacco policy for youth: ethical and policy implications. Addiction. 1997 Sep;92(9):1165–1173. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith Dennis W., Colwell Brian, Zhang James J., Brimer Jennifer, McMillan Catherine, Stevens Stacey. Theory-based development and testing of an adolescent tobacco-use awareness program. Am J Health Behav. 2002 Mar-Apr;26(2):137–144. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.26.2.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Task Force on Community Preventive Services Recommendations regarding interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Am J Prev Med. 2001 Feb;20(2 Suppl):10–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turbin M. S., Jessor R., Costa F. M. Adolescent cigarette smoking: health-related behavior or normative transgression? Prev Sci. 2000 Sep;1(3):115–124. doi: 10.1023/a:1010094221568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wakefield M., Giovino G. Teen penalties for tobacco possession, use, and purchase: evidence and issues. Tob Control. 2003 Jun;12 (Suppl 1):i6–13. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.suppl_1.i6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wolfson M., Hourigan M. Unintended consequences and professional ethics: criminalization of alcohol and tobacco use by youth and young adults. Addiction. 1997 Sep;92(9):1159–1164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Woodhouse L. D., Sayre J. J., Livingood W. C. Tobacco policy and the role of law enforcement in prevention: the value of understanding context. Qual Health Res. 2001 Sep;11(5):682–692. doi: 10.1177/104973201129119370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]