Abstract
Background: The Barclay cigarette (Brown & Williamson) was introduced in 1980 in the USA in the most expensive launch in history. In the USA and around the world, Barclay was later determined to have a grooved filter design that was compromised by human smokers in the normal act of smoking, but that was measured as ultra-low tar using the standard tar testing protocol.
Objectives: To evaluate whether Brown & Williamson knew of the compensatability of Barclay during the design process and before it was released; to evaluate initial responses of competing tobacco companies to Barclay, before complaints were made to the Federal Trade Commission in 1981.
Methods: Internet databases of industry documents (Tobacco Documents Online, Legacy Tobacco Documents Library, Brown & Williamson Litigation discovery website, Guildford and major company websites) were searched using key words, key dates, and targeted searches. Documents related specifically to the development, evaluation and release of the Barclay cigarette and related to the responses by competing tobacco companies were examined.
Results: Documents indicate the manufacturer was aware of Barclay design problems and was planning, before release, to respond to criticism. Competing companies quickly detected the filter groove stratagem and considered developing their own similar filter, but eventually backed off.
Conclusion: The design problems with Barclay were readily understood by cigarette manufacturers, including the maker of Barclay, before official governmental evaluations occurred. Testing involving measured exposures to human smokers may in the end be crucial to identifying problems with novel cigarette designs.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (181.7 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Benowitz N. L., Hall S. M., Herning R. I., Jacob P., 3rd, Jones R. T., Osman A. L. Smokers of low-yield cigarettes do not consume less nicotine. N Engl J Med. 1983 Jul 21;309(3):139–142. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198307213090303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bialous S. A., Yach D. Whose standard is it, anyway? How the tobacco industry determines the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards for tobacco and tobacco products. Tob Control. 2001 Jun;10(2):96–104. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.2.96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Collin Jeff, Lee Kelley, Gilmore Anna B. Unlocking the corporate documents of British American Tobacco: an invaluable global resource needs radically improved access. Lancet. 2004 May 29;363(9423):1746–1747. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16334-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gray N., Kozlowski L. T. More on the regulation of tobacco smoke: how we got here and where next. Ann Oncol. 2003 Mar;14(3):353–357. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdg103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Katz S. K., Lavack A. M. Tobacco related bar promotions: insights from tobacco industry documents. Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 (Suppl 1):I92–101. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kozlowski L. T., O'Connor R. J. Cigarette filter ventilation is a defective design because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked vents. Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 (Suppl 1):I40–I50. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kozlowski L. T., O'Connor R. J. Official cigarette tar tests are misleading: use a two-stage, compensating test. Lancet. 2000 Jun 17;355(9221):2159–2161. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02390-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kozlowski L. T., Rickert W. S., Robinson J. C., Grunberg N. E. Have tar and nicotine yields of cigarettes changed? Science. 1980 Sep 26;209(4464):1550–1551. doi: 10.1126/science.7433979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muggli Monique E., LeGresley Eric M., Hurt Richard D. Big tobacco is watching: British American Tobacco's surveillance and information concealment at the Guildford depository. Lancet. 2004 May 29;363(9423):1812–1819. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16309-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]