Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2005 Apr;14(2):114–117. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.008789

Validity of self reports in a cohort of Swedish adolescent smokers and smokeless tobacco (snus) users

A Post 1, H Gilljam 1, I Rosendahl 1, L Meurling 1, S Bremberg 1, M Galanti 1
PMCID: PMC1747998  PMID: 15791021

Abstract

Objective: To validate self reports of cigarette and smokeless tobacco (snus) use in a prospective cohort of adolescents.

Design: A cross sectional analysis of a cohort sub-sample.

Setting: County of Stockholm, Sweden.

Subjects: 520 adolescents in the final grade of junior high school (mean age 15.0 years).

Main outcome measure: Concordance between self reported tobacco use and saliva cotinine concentration.

Results: Using a cut point of 5 ng/ml saliva cotinine to discriminate active tobacco use, there was a 98% concordance between self reported non-use in the past month and cotinine concentration. The sensitivity of the questionnaire compared to the saliva cotinine test, used as the gold standard, was 90% and the specificity 93%. One hundred and fifteen out of 520 subjects (22%) reported monthly tobacco use. Among these, 67% (46/69) of the exclusive cigarette smokers, 82% (23/28) of exclusive snus users, and 94% (15/16) of mixed users (cigarettes + snus) had cotinine concentrations above 5 ng/ml. Among subjects reporting daily use 96% (64/67) had saliva cotinine concentrations above the cut point. Exclusive current cigarette users were more likely to be classified discordantly by questionnaire and cotinine test compared to snus users (odds ratio 3.2, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 8.6).

Conclusion: This study confirms the reliability of adolescents' self reported tobacco use. In a context of low exposure to environmental tobacco smoke a cut off for saliva cotinine of 5 ng/ml reliably discriminated tobacco users from non-users. Irregular use of tobacco in this age group probably explains the discrepancy between self reported use and cotinine concentrations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (71.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bauman K. E., Koch G. G., Bryan E. S., Haley N. J., Downton M. I., Orlandi M. A. On the measurement of tobacco use by adolescents. Validity of self-reports of smokeless tobacco use and validity of cotinine as an indicator of cigarette smoking. Am J Epidemiol. 1989 Aug;130(2):327–337. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benowitz N. L., Kuyt F., Jacob P., 3rd, Jones R. T., Osman A. L. Cotinine disposition and effects. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1983 Nov;34(5):604–611. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1983.222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Caraballo Ralph S., Giovino Gary A., Pechacek Terry F. Self-reported cigarette smoking vs. serum cotinine among U.S. adolescents. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004 Feb;6(1):19–25. doi: 10.1080/14622200310001656821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Curvall M., Elwin C. E., Kazemi-Vala E., Warholm C., Enzell C. R. The pharmacokinetics of cotinine in plasma and saliva from non-smoking healthy volunteers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1990;38(3):281–287. doi: 10.1007/BF00315031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dolcini M. Margaret, Adler Nancy E., Lee Patricia, Bauman Karl E. An assessment of the validity of adolescent self-reported smoking using three biological indicators. Nicotine Tob Res. 2003 Aug;5(4):473–483. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Evans R. I., Hansen W. B., Mittelmark M. B. Increasing the validity of self-reports of smoking behavior in children. J Appl Psychol. 1977 Aug;62(4):521–523. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Galanti M. R., Rosendahl I., Post A., Gilljam H. Early gender differences in adolescent tobacco use--the experience of a Swedish cohort. Scand J Public Health. 2001 Dec;29(4):314–317. doi: 10.1080/140349401317115286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Galanti M. R., Wickholm S., Gilljam H. Between harm and dangers. Oral snuff use, cigarette smoking and problem behaviours in a survey of Swedish male adolescents. Eur J Public Health. 2001 Sep;11(3):340–345. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/11.3.340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Helgason A. R., Lund K. E. Environmental tobacco smoke exposure of young children--attitudes and health-risk awareness in the Nordic countries. Nicotine Tob Res. 2001 Nov;3(4):341–345. doi: 10.1080/14622200110050420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mayhew K. P., Flay B. R., Mott J. A. Stages in the development of adolescent smoking. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2000 May 1;59 (Suppl 1):S61–S81. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(99)00165-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Willers S., Axmon A., Feyerabend C., Nielsen J., Skarping G., Skerfving S. Assessment of environmental tobacco smoke exposure in children with asthmatic symptoms by questionnaire and cotinine concentrations in plasma, saliva, and urine. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Jul;53(7):715–721. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00212-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Williams C. L., Eng A., Botvin G. J., Hill P., Wynder E. L. Validation of students' self-reported cigarette smoking status with plasma cotinine levels. Am J Public Health. 1979 Dec;69(12):1272–1274. doi: 10.2105/ajph.69.12.1272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES