Full text
PDFSelected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bassey C. M., Baltch A. L., Smith R. P. Comparative antimicrobial activity of enoxacin, ciprofloxacin, amifloxacin, norfloxacin and ofloxacin against 177 bacterial isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1986 May;17(5):623–628. doi: 10.1093/jac/17.5.623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colston M. J., Hilson G. R., Banerjee D. K. The "proportional bactericidal test": a method for assessing bactericidal activity in drugs against Mycobacterium leprae in mice. Lepr Rev. 1978 Mar;49(1):7–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gay J. D., DeYoung D. R., Roberts G. D. In vitro activities of norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin against Mycobacterium tuberculosis, M. avium complex, M. chelonei, M. fortuitum, and M. kansasii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Jul;26(1):94–96. doi: 10.1128/aac.26.1.94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- King A., Phillips I. The comparative in-vitro activity of pefloxacin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1986 Apr;17 (Suppl B):1–10. doi: 10.1093/jac/17.suppl_b.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muytjens H. L., van der Ros-van de Repe J., van Veldhuizen G. Comparative activities of ciprofloxacin (Bay o 9867), norfloxacin, pipemidic acid, and nalidixic acid. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Aug;24(2):302–304. doi: 10.1128/aac.24.2.302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shepard C. C., Levy L., Fasal P. Rapid bactericidal effect of rifampin on Mycobacterium leprae. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1972 Jul;21(4):446–449. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1972.21.446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shepard C. C. Statistical analysis of results obtained by two methods for testing drug activity against Mycobacterium leprae. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1982 Mar;50(1):96–101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tsukamura M. In vitro antimycobacterial activity of a new antibacterial substance DL-8280--differentiation between some species of mycobacteria and related organisms by the DL-8280 susceptibility test. Microbiol Immunol. 1983;27(12):1129–1132. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1983.tb02933.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Valero-Guillén P. L., Martín-Luengo F., Quintanilla I. In-vitro activity of some quinoline derivatives against Mycobacterium fortuitum. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1985 Feb;15(2):254–255. doi: 10.1093/jac/15.2.254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Caekenberghe D. L., Pattyn S. R. In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin compared with those of other new fluorinated piperazinyl-substituted quinoline derivatives. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Apr;25(4):518–521. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.4.518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wise R., Andrews J. M., Edwards L. J. In vitro activity of Bay 09867, a new quinoline derivative, compared with those of other antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Apr;23(4):559–564. doi: 10.1128/aac.23.4.559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wolfson J. S., Hooper D. C. The fluoroquinolones: structures, mechanisms of action and resistance, and spectra of activity in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Oct;28(4):581–586. doi: 10.1128/aac.28.4.581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]