Skip to main content
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2005 Oct;14(5):338–345. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.010637

From strange bedfellows to natural allies: the shifting allegiance of fire service organisations in the push for federal fire-safe cigarette legislation

E Barbeau 1, G Kelder 1, S Ahmed 1, V Mantuefel 1, E Balbach 1
PMCID: PMC1748100  PMID: 16183985

Abstract

Background: Cigarettes are the leading cause of fatal fires in the USA and are associated with one in four fire deaths. Although the technology needed to make fire-safe cigarettes has been available for many years, progress has been slow on legislative and regulatory fronts to require the tobacco industry to manufacture fire-safe cigarettes.

Method and results: We conducted a case study, drawing on data from tobacco industry documents, archives, and key informant interviews to investigate tobacco industry strategies for thwarting fire-safe cigarette legislation in the US Congress. We apply a theoretical framework that posits that policymaking is the product of three sets of forces: interests, institutions, and ideas, to examine tobacco industry behaviour, with a special focus on their and others' attempts to court fire service organisations, including firefighters' unions as allies. We discuss the implications of our findings for future policy efforts related to fire-safe cigarettes and other tobacco control issues.

Conclusions: Tobacco control advocates ought to: continue efforts to align key interest groups, including the firefighters unions; contest tobacco industry "diversionary" science tactics; and pursue a state based legislative strategy for fire-safe cigarettes, building towards national legislation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (151.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Balbach E. D., Gasior R. J., Barbeau E. M. Tobacco industry documents: comparing the Minnesota Depository and internet access. Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11(1):68–72. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.1.68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Balbach Edith D., Barbeau Elizabeth M., Manteufel Viola, Pan Jocelyn. Political coalitions for mutual advantage: the case of the Tobacco Institute's Labor Management Committee. Am J Public Health. 2005 Jun;95(6):985–993. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.052126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bryan-Jones Katherine, Bero Lisa A. Tobacco industry efforts to defeat the occupational safety and health administration indoor air quality rule. Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):585–592. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.4.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Drope J., Chapman S. Tobacco industry efforts at discrediting scientific knowledge of environmental tobacco smoke: a review of internal industry documents. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Aug;55(8):588–594. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.8.588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gunja M., Wayne G. Ferris, Landman A., Connolly G., McGuire A. The case for fire safe cigarettes made through industry documents. Tob Control. 2002 Dec;11(4):346–353. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.4.346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hong Mi-Kyung, Bero Lisa A. How the tobacco industry responded to an influential study of the health effects of secondhand smoke. BMJ. 2002 Dec 14;325(7377):1413–1416. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7377.1413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Malone R. E., Balbach E. D. Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire? Tob Control. 2000 Sep;9(3):334–338. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.3.334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Muggli M. E., Pollay R. W., Lew R., Joseph A. M. Targeting of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders by the tobacco industry: results from the Minnesota Tobacco Document Depository. Tob Control. 2002 Sep;11(3):201–209. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.3.201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Neilsen K., Glantz S. A. A tobacco industry study of airline cabin air quality: dropping inconvenient findings. Tob Control. 2004 Mar;13 (Suppl 1):i20–i29. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.004721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ong E. K., Glantz S. A. Constructing "sound science" and "good epidemiology": tobacco, lawyers, and public relations firms. Am J Public Health. 2001 Nov;91(11):1749–1757. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.11.1749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pan Jocelyn, Barbeau Elizabeth M., Levenstein Charles, Balbach Edith D. Smoke-free airlines and the role of organized labor: a case study. Am J Public Health. 2005 Mar;95(3):398–404. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.040592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES