Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2000 Mar;9(1):16–23. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.1.16

Smoke signs: patterns of tobacco billboard advertising in a metropolitan region

D Luke 1, E Esmundo 1, Y Bloom 1
PMCID: PMC1748288  PMID: 10691754

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To use geographic information systems data and analyses to describe locations and characteristics of tobacco billboards in a large metropolitan area, and to assess the extent to which tobacco companies are locating billboards in close proximity to minority neighbourhoods and schools.
DESIGN—Observational study of billboards in a large metropolitan region.
SETTING—City and county of St Louis, Missouri.
PARTICIPANTS—All stationary billboards in the city and county of St Louis were eligible to be observed, with the exception of bus stop and street side retail advertising signs (for example, cigarette advertising at gas stations). A total of 1239 non-blank billboards were observed. All data were collected in early 1998.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES—Tobacco and non-tobacco billboard geographic distribution; billboard type and product brand frequencies; and billboard neighbourhood characteristics.
RESULTS—Almost 20% of the billboards contained tobacco advertising. Four of the top five and nine of the top 22 brands displayed on billboards were tobacco products. Billboards were located in all areas of St Louis except for the communities with the highest average incomes. Tobacco billboards were more likely to be found in low income areas and areas with a higher percentage of African Americans. Images of African American figures on tobacco billboards were concentrated in the most heavily African American populated regions of the city. Approximately 74% of all billboards in the city of St Louis were within 2000 feet (700 metres) of public school property.
CONCLUSIONS—Tobacco products were the single most heavily advertised type of product on billboards in St Louis. The geographic distribution of tobacco billboards, as well as the types of images found on these billboards, is consistent with the hypothesis that tobacco companies are targeting poor and minority communities with their advertising. Methods employing geographic information systems are a powerful technique for examining outdoor tobacco advertising.


Keywords: tobacco advertising; billboards; maps; geographic information systems

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (366.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aitken P. P., Eadie D. R. Reinforcing effects of cigarette advertising on under-age smoking. Br J Addict. 1990 Mar;85(3):399–412. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1990.tb00657.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnett J. J., Terhanian G. Adolescents' responses to cigarette advertisements: links between exposure, liking, and the appeal of smoking. Tob Control. 1998 Summer;7(2):129–133. doi: 10.1136/tc.7.2.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Croner C. M., Sperling J., Broome F. R. Geographic information systems (GIS): new perspectives in understanding human health and environmental relationships. Stat Med. 1996 Sep 15;15(17-18):1961–1977. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19960930)15:18<1961::aid-sim408>3.0.co;2-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DiFranza J. R., Richards J. W., Paulman P. M., Wolf-Gillespie N., Fletcher C., Jaffe R. D., Murray D. RJR Nabisco's cartoon camel promotes camel cigarettes to children. JAMA. 1991 Dec 11;266(22):3149–3153. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Evans N., Farkas A., Gilpin E., Berry C., Pierce J. P. Influence of tobacco marketing and exposure to smokers on adolescent susceptibility to smoking. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995 Oct 18;87(20):1538–1545. doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.20.1538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ewert D., Alleyne D. Risk of exposure to outdoor advertising of cigarettes and alcohol. Am J Public Health. 1992 Jun;82(6):895–896. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.6.895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Feighery E., Borzekowski D. L., Schooler C., Flora J. Seeing, wanting, owning: the relationship between receptivity to tobacco marketing and smoking susceptibility in young people. Tob Control. 1998 Summer;7(2):123–128. doi: 10.1136/tc.7.2.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fischer P. M., Schwartz M. P., Richards J. W., Jr, Goldstein A. O., Rojas T. H. Brand logo recognition by children aged 3 to 6 years. Mickey Mouse and Old Joe the Camel. JAMA. 1991 Dec 11;266(22):3145–3148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Garner D. W. Banning tobacco billboards: The case for municipal action. JAMA. 1996 Apr 24;275(16):1263–1269. doi: 10.1001/jama.275.16.1263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gilpin E. A., Pierce J. P., Rosbrook B. Are adolescents receptive to current sales promotion practices of the tobacco industry? Prev Med. 1997 Jan-Feb;26(1):14–21. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1996.9980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gilpin E. A., Pierce J. P. Trends in adolescent smoking initiation in the United States: is tobacco marketing an influence? Tob Control. 1997 Summer;6(2):122–127. doi: 10.1136/tc.6.2.122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hackbarth D. P., Silvestri B., Cosper W. Tobacco and alcohol billboards in 50 Chicago neighborhoods: market segmentation to sell dangerous products to the poor. J Public Health Policy. 1995;16(2):213–230. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pierce J. P., Choi W. S., Gilpin E. A., Farkas A. J., Berry C. C. Tobacco industry promotion of cigarettes and adolescent smoking. JAMA. 1998 Feb 18;279(7):511–515. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.7.511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pierce J. P., Gilpin E., Burns D. M., Whalen E., Rosbrook B., Shopland D., Johnson M. Does tobacco advertising target young people to start smoking? Evidence from California. JAMA. 1991 Dec 11;266(22):3154–3158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pierce J. P., Lee L., Gilpin E. A. Smoking initiation by adolescent girls, 1944 through 1988. An association with targeted advertising. JAMA. 1994 Feb 23;271(8):608–611. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Stoddard J. L., Johnson C. A., Boley-Cruz T., Sussman S. Targeted tobacco markets: outdoor advertising in Los Angeles minority neighborhoods. Am J Public Health. 1997 Jul;87(7):1232–1233. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.7.1232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tye J. B., Warner K. E., Glantz S. A. Tobacco advertising and consumption: evidence of a causal relationship. J Public Health Policy. 1987 Winter;8(4):492–508. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES