Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2000 Jun;9(2):187–192. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.2.187

Costs of employee smoking in the workplace in Scotland

S Parrott 1, C Godfrey 1, M Raw 1
PMCID: PMC1748323  PMID: 10841855

Abstract

BACKGROUND—Employers have responded to new regulations on the effects of passive smoking by introducing a range of workplace policies. Few policies include provision of smoking cessation intervention.
OBJECTIVE—To estimate the cost to employers of smoking in the workplace in Scotland to illustrate the potential gains from smoking cessation provision. Costs vary with type of smoking policy in place; therefore, to estimate these costs results from a survey were combined with evidence drawn from a literature review.
STUDY DESIGN—A telephone survey of 200 Scottish workplaces, based on a stratified random sample of workplaces with 50 or more employees, was conducted in 1996. Additional evidence was compiled from a review of the literature of smoking related costs and specific smoking related effects.
RESULTS—167 completed responses were received, of which 156 employers (93%) operated a smoking policy, 57 (34%) operated smoke free buildings, and 89 (53%) restricted smoking to a "smoke room". The research literature shows absenteeism to be higher among smokers when compared to non-smokers. The estimated cost of smoking related absence in Scotland is £40 million per annum. Total productivity losses are estimated at approximately £450 million per annum. In addition, the resource cost in terms of losses from fires caused by smoking materials is estimated at approximately £4 million per annum. In addition, there are costs from smoking related deaths and smoking related damage to premises.
CONCLUSION—This study shows how smoking cessation interventions in the workplace can yield positive cost savings for employers, resulting in gains in productivity and workplace attendance which may outweigh the cost of any smoking cessation programme.


Keywords: costs of employee smoking; Scotland; smoking related absence

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (130.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barendregt J. J., Bonneux L., van der Maas P. J. The health care costs of smoking. N Engl J Med. 1997 Oct 9;337(15):1052–1057. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199710093371506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bertera R. L. The effects of behavioral risks on absenteeism and health-care costs in the workplace. J Occup Med. 1991 Nov;33(11):1119–1124. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199111000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clarke J., Borland R., McGartland M. The effects of smoking outside workplaces on non-regular smokers. J Occup Environ Med. 1997 Aug;39(8):734–739. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199708000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gottlieb N. H., Eriksen M. P., Lovato C. Y., Weinstein R. P., Green L. W. Impact of a restrictive work site smoking policy on smoking behavior, attitudes, and norms. J Occup Med. 1990 Jan;32(1):16–23. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199001000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hocking B., Borland R., Owen N., Kemp G. A total ban on workplace smoking is acceptable and effective. J Occup Med. 1991 Feb;33(2):163–167. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hocking B., Grain H., Gordon I. Cost to industry of illnesses related to alcohol and smoking. A study of Telecom Australia employees. Med J Aust. 1994 Oct 3;161(7):407–412. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kaiserman M. J. The cost of smoking in Canada, 1991. Chronic Dis Can. 1997;18(1):13–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Koopmanschap M. A., Rutten F. F., van Ineveld B. M., van Roijen L. The friction cost method for measuring indirect costs of disease. J Health Econ. 1995 Jun;14(2):171–189. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(94)00044-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Repace J. L., Lowrey A. H. An enforceable indoor air quality standard for environmental tobacco smoke in the workplace. Risk Anal. 1993 Aug;13(4):463–475. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb00747.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tsai S. P., Gilstrap E. L., Colangelo T. A., Menard A. K., Ross C. E. Illness absence at an oil refinery and petrochemical plant. J Occup Environ Med. 1997 May;39(5):455–462. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199705000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Van Tuinen M., Land G. Smoking and excess sick leave in a department of health. J Occup Med. 1986 Jan;28(1):33–35. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198601000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Warner K. E., Wickizer T. M., Wolfe R. A., Schildroth J. E., Samuelson M. H. Economic implications of workplace health promotion programs: review of the literature. J Occup Med. 1988 Feb;30(2):106–112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES