Skip to main content
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2000 Dec;9(4):423–430. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.4.423

Evolution of a comprehensive tobacco control programme: building system capacity and strategic partnerships—lessons from Massachusetts

H Robbins 1, M Krakow 1
PMCID: PMC1748385  PMID: 11106713

Abstract

BACKGROUND—Since the passage of a voter approved state referendum in 1992 to establish a 25 cent increase on the excise tax on cigarettes and smokeless tobacco, Massachusetts has received an average of $40 million annually for its tobacco control programme. This funding allowed Massachusetts to expand and develop its tobacco control programme to become one of the most comprehensive in the world.
OBJECTIVES—The development of the Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program is outlined, focusing on three stages of development: formation, strategic partnership building, and shared leadership.
METHODS—The development of management structures, programmatic infrastructure, communication and partnership networks, and advisory structures are tracked throughout the three phases.
RESULTS—The use of pre-existing public health resources, implementation of a strong training component, a geographical management structure, the creation of public and private partnerships, and the development of a shared leadership model contributed to building consensus and provided the foundation for coordinated approaches to tobacco control.
CONCLUSION—Other states and countries can use lessons learned from Massachusetts about the organisational development of a comprehensive tobacco control programme as they embark upon similar efforts.


Keywords: Massachusetts; infrastructure; system development; tobacco control programme

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (185.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bal D. G., Kizer K. W., Felten P. G., Mozar H. N., Niemeyer D. Reducing tobacco consumption in California. Development of a statewide anti-tobacco use campaign. JAMA. 1990 Sep 26;264(12):1570–1574. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Begay M. E., Glantz S. A. Question 1 tobacco education expenditures in Massachusetts, USA. Tob Control. 1997 Autumn;6(3):213–218. doi: 10.1136/tc.6.3.213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Connolly G., Robbins H. Designing an effective statewide tobacco control program--Massachusetts. Cancer. 1998 Dec 15;83(12 Suppl ROBERT):2722–2727. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19981215)83:12a+<2722::aid-cncr12>3.0.co;2-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Koh H. K. An analysis of the successful 1992 Massachusetts tobacco tax initiative. Tob Control. 1996 Autumn;5(3):220–225. doi: 10.1136/tc.5.3.220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Siegel M., Biener L. The impact of an antismoking media campaign on progression to established smoking: results of a longitudinal youth study. Am J Public Health. 2000 Mar;90(3):380–386. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.3.380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES