Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1987 Aug;31(8):1222–1224. doi: 10.1128/aac.31.8.1222

Determination of teicoplanin concentrations in serum by high-pressure liquid chromatography.

B Joos, R Lüthy
PMCID: PMC174907  PMID: 2957953

Abstract

An isocratic reversed-phase high-pressure liquid chromatographic method for the determination of six components of the teicoplanin complex in biological fluid was developed. By using fluorescence detection after precolumn derivatization with fluorescamine, the assay is specific and highly sensitive, with reproducibility studies yielding coefficients of variation ranging from 1.5 to 8.5% (at 5 to 80 micrograms/ml). Response was linear from 2.5 to 80 micrograms/ml (r = 0.999); the recovery from spiked human serum was 76%. An external quality control was performed to compare this high-pressure liquid chromatographic method (H) with a standard microbiological assay (M); no significant deviation from slope = 1 and intercept = 0 was found by regression analysis (H = 1.03M - 0.45; n = 15).

Full text

PDF
1222

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bardone M. R., Paternoster M., Coronelli C. Teichomycins, new antibiotics from Actinoplanes teichomyceticus nov. sp. II. Extraction and chemical characterization. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 1978 Mar;31(3):170–177. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.31.170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barna J. C., Williams D. H., Strazzolini P., Malabarba A., Leung T. W. Structure and conformation of epimers derived from the antibiotic teicoplanin. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 1984 Oct;37(10):1204–1208. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.37.1204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Borghi A., Coronelli C., Faniuolo L., Allievi G., Pallanza R., Gallo G. G. Teichomycins, new antibiotics from Actinoplanes teichomyceticus nov. sp. IV. Separation and characterization of the components of teichomycin (teicoplanin). J Antibiot (Tokyo) 1984 Jun;37(6):615–620. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.37.615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cavenaghi L., Corti A., Cassani G. Comparison of the solid phase enzyme receptor assay (SPERA) and the microbiological assay for teicoplanin. J Hosp Infect. 1986 Mar;7 (Suppl A):85–89. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(86)90012-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jadeja L., Fainstein V., LeBlanc B., Bodey G. P. Comparative in vitro activities of teichomycin and other antibiotics against JK diphtheroids. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Aug;24(2):145–146. doi: 10.1128/aac.24.2.145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Neu H. C., Labthavikul P. In vitro activity of teichomycin compared with those of other antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Sep;24(3):425–428. doi: 10.1128/aac.24.3.425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pallanza R., Berti M., Goldstein B. P., Mapelli E., Randisi E., Scotti R., Arioli V. Teichomycin: in-vitro and in-vivo evaluation in comparison with other antibiotics. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1983 May;11(5):419–425. doi: 10.1093/jac/11.5.419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Parenti F., Beretta G., Berti M., Arioli V. Teichomycins, new antibiotics from Actinoplanes teichomyceticus Nov. Sp. I. Description of the producer strain, fermentation studies and biological properties. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 1978 Apr;31(4):276–283. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.31.276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Passing H., Bablok A new biometrical procedure for testing the equality of measurements from two different analytical methods. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in clinical chemistry, Part I. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1983 Nov;21(11):709–720. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1983.21.11.709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Somma S., Gastaldo L., Corti A. Teicoplanin, a new antibiotic from Actinoplanes teichomyceticus nov. sp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Dec;26(6):917–923. doi: 10.1128/aac.26.6.917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Verbist L., Tjandramaga B., Hendrickx B., Van Hecken A., Van Melle P., Verbesselt R., Verhaegen J., De Schepper P. J. In vitro activity and human pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Dec;26(6):881–886. doi: 10.1128/aac.26.6.881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Williams A. H., Grüneberg R. N. Teicoplanin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Nov;14(5):441–445. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES