Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1987 Oct;31(10):1549–1552. doi: 10.1128/aac.31.10.1549

Comparative activity of CGP 31608, nafcillin, cefamandole, imipenem, and vancomycin against methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant staphylococci.

M Sachdeva 1, C Hackbarth 1, F B Stella 1, H F Chambers 1
PMCID: PMC174987  PMID: 3481245

Abstract

The activity of CGP 31608 for 53 strains of Staphylococcus aureus and 48 strains of S. epidermidis, both methicillin susceptible and resistant, was compared with that of vancomycin, nafcillin, cefamandole, and imipenem. Microdilution MICs were determined in Mueller-Hinton broth with or without 2.5% NaCl at an inoculum of 3 x 10(5) CFU/ml with a 20-h, 37 degrees C incubation. The MICs of imipenem and CGP 31608 for methicillin-resistant strains were lower than the MICs of nafcillin or cefamandole for these strains; these differences diminished in the presence of 2.5% NaCl. Subpopulations were detected in strains of methicillin-resistant S. aureus and S. epidermidis that were resistant to all the beta-lactam antibiotics tested at 5 micrograms/ml. This resistant subpopulation produced progeny that were uniformly resistant to high concentrations of each of the beta-lactams.

Full text

PDF
1549

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chambers H. F., Hackbarth C. J., Drake T. A., Rusnak M. G., Sande M. A. Endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in rabbits: expression of resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics in vivo and in vitro. J Infect Dis. 1984 Jun;149(6):894–903. doi: 10.1093/infdis/149.6.894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Frongillo R. F., Bianchi P., Moretti A., Pasticci M. B., Ripa S., Pauluzzi S. Cross-resistance between methicillin and cephalosporins for staphylococci: a general assumption not true for cefamandole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 May;25(5):666–668. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.5.666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Neu H. C., Chin N. X., Neu N. M. In vitro activity and beta-lactamase stability of a new penem, CGP 31608. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Apr;31(4):558–569. doi: 10.1128/aac.31.4.558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Shanholtzer C. J., Peterson L. R., Mohn M. L., Moody J. A., Gerding D. N. MBCs for Staphylococcus aureus as determined by macrodilution and microdilution techniques. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Aug;26(2):214–219. doi: 10.1128/aac.26.2.214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Vazquez G. J., Archer G. L. Antibiotic therapy of experimental Staphylococcus epidermidis endocarditis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Feb;17(2):280–285. doi: 10.1128/aac.17.2.280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wise R., Andrews J. M., Piddock L. J. In vitro activity of CGP 31608, a new penem. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Feb;31(2):267–273. doi: 10.1128/aac.31.2.267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES