Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1987 Oct;31(10):1651–1655. doi: 10.1128/aac.31.10.1651

In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin against aerobic bacteria isolated in a southern European hospital.

G Cornaglia 1, R Pompei 1, B Dainelli 1, G Satta 1
PMCID: PMC175009  PMID: 3435111

Abstract

The activity of ciprofloxacin was evaluated against 1,204 isolates freshly isolated in Southern Europe, including 193 isolates of 10 species never studied before. Ciprofloxacin proved more active than other quinolones and very active in absolute terms against the 10 new species and showed against the other species an activity close to that reported for isolates from other geographic areas.

Full text

PDF
1651

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barry A. L., Fass R. J., Anhalt J. P., Neu H. C., Thornsberry C., Tilton R. C., Painter B. G., Washington J. A., 2nd Ciprofloxacin disk susceptibility tests: interpretive zone size standards for 5-microgram disks. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Jun;21(6):880–883. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.6.880-883.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barry A. L., Jones R. N., Thornsberry C., Ayers L. W., Gerlach E. H., Sommers H. M. Antibacterial activities of ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, oxolinic acid, cinoxacin, and nalidixic acid. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 May;25(5):633–637. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.5.633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bauernfeind A., Petermüller C. In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin and nalidixic acid. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Apr;2(2):111–115. doi: 10.1007/BF02001575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chin N. X., Neu H. C. Ciprofloxacin, a quinolone carboxylic acid compound active against aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Mar;25(3):319–326. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.3.319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Digranes A., Dibb W. L., Benonisen E. In vitro activities of ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, norfloxacin and rosoxacin compared with cinoxacin and trimethoprim. Chemotherapy. 1985;31(6):466–471. doi: 10.1159/000238375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Eliopoulos G. M., Gardella A., Moellering R. C., Jr In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin, a new carboxyquinoline antimicrobial agent. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Mar;25(3):331–335. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.3.331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Facklam R. R. Recognition of group D streptococcal species of human origin by biochemical and physiological tests. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Jun;23(6):1131–1139. doi: 10.1128/am.23.6.1131-1139.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Farmer J. J., 3rd, Davis B. R., Hickman-Brenner F. W., McWhorter A., Huntley-Carter G. P., Asbury M. A., Riddle C., Wathen-Grady H. G., Elias C., Fanning G. R. Biochemical identification of new species and biogroups of Enterobacteriaceae isolated from clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Jan;21(1):46–76. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.1.46-76.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fass R. J., Helsel V. L., Barnishan J., Ayers L. W. In vitro susceptibilities of four species of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 Oct;30(4):545–552. doi: 10.1128/aac.30.4.545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fass R. J. In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin (Bay o 9867). Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Oct;24(4):568–574. doi: 10.1128/aac.24.4.568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hawkey P. M., Hawkey C. A. Comparative in-vitro activity of quinolone carboxylic acids against Proteeae. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Nov;14(5):485–489. doi: 10.1093/jac/14.5.485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Husson M. O., Izard D., Bouillet L., Leclerc H. Comparative in-vitro activity of ciprofloxacin against non-fermenters. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1985 Apr;15(4):457–462. doi: 10.1093/jac/15.4.457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kloos W. E., Schleifer K. H. Simplified scheme for routine identification of human Staphylococcus species. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Jan;1(1):82–88. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.1.82-88.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Roy C., Foz A., Segura C., Tirado M., Teixell M., Teruel D. Activity of ciprofloxacin (BAYo 9867) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and ampicillin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Infection. 1983 Nov-Dec;11(6):326–328. doi: 10.1007/BF01641358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Varaldo P. E., Grazi G., Soro O., Cisani G., Satta G. Simplified lyogroup system, a new method for routine identification of staphylococci: description and comparison with three other methods. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Jul;12(1):63–68. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.1.63-68.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wolfson J. S., Hooper D. C. The fluoroquinolones: structures, mechanisms of action and resistance, and spectra of activity in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Oct;28(4):581–586. doi: 10.1128/aac.28.4.581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES