Skip to main content
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 1998 Dec;7(4):369–375. doi: 10.1136/tc.7.4.369

Filter ventilation and nicotine content of tobacco in cigarettes from Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States

L Kozlowski 1, N Mehta 1, C Sweeney 1, S Schwartz 1, G Vogler 1, M Jarvis 1, R West 1
PMCID: PMC1751464  PMID: 10093170

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—The purpose was to determine filter ventilation and the nicotine content of tobacco and their contribution to machine-smoked yields of cigarettes from the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom.
METHODS—Ninety-two brands of cigarettes (32 American, 23 Canadian, and 37 British brands) were purchased at retail outlets in State College, Pennsylvania, United States, Toronto, Canada, and London, United Kingdom. A FIDUS FDT filter ventilation tester measured the percentage air-dilution from filter vents. High-pressure, liquid chromatography was used to measure the nicotine content of tobacco. Regression techniques were used to examine the contributions of tobacco nicotine content and filter ventilation to machine-smoked yields of tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide (CO).
RESULTS—Ninety-four per cent of the American brands, 91% of the Canadian brands, and 79% of British brands were ventilated. The total nicotine content of tobacco and percent nicotine (by weight of tobacco) averaged 10.2 mg (standard error of the mean (SEM) 0.25, range: 7.2 to 13.4) and 1.5% (SEM 0.03, range 1.2 to 2) in the United States, 13.5 mg (SEM 0.49, range: 8.0 to 18.3) and 1.8% (SEM 0.06, range: 1.0 to 2.4) in Canada, 12.5 mg (SEM 0.33, range: 9 to 17.5) and 1.7% (SEM 0.04, range: 1.3 to 2.4) in the United Kingdom. Multiple regression analyses showed that ventilation was by far the largest factor influencing machine-smoked yields of tar, nicotine, and CO.
CONCLUSION—Filter ventilation appears to be the predominant method for reducing machine-smoked yields of tar, nicotine, and CO in three countries. However, some brands contain about twice as much nicotine (total content or percent nicotine) as do others, indicating that tobacco types or blends and tobacco casings can be used to manipulate nicotine content and nicotine delivery of cigarettes.


Keywords: filter ventilation; nicotine content; cigarettes

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (118.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Benowitz N. L., Hall S. M., Herning R. I., Jacob P., 3rd, Jones R. T., Osman A. L. Smokers of low-yield cigarettes do not consume less nicotine. N Engl J Med. 1983 Jul 21;309(3):139–142. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198307213090303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Grunberg N. E., Morse D. E., Maycock V. A., Kozlowski L. T. Changes in overwrap and butt length of American filter cigarettes. An influence on reported tar yields. N Y State J Med. 1985 Jul;85(7):310–312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kessler D. A., Witt A. M., Barnett P. S., Zeller M. R., Natanblut S. L., Wilkenfeld J. P., Lorraine C. C., Thompson L. J., Schultz W. B. The Food and Drug Administration's regulation of tobacco products. N Engl J Med. 1996 Sep 26;335(13):988–994. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199609263351321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kozlowski L. T., Frecker R. C., Khouw V., Pope M. A. The misuse of 'less-hazardous' cigarettes and its detection: hole-blocking of ventilated filters. Am J Public Health. 1980 Nov;70(11):1202–1203. doi: 10.2105/ajph.70.11.1202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kozlowski L. T., Goldberg M. E., Yost B. A., Ahern F. M., Aronson K. R., Sweeney C. T. Smokers are unaware of the filter vents now on most cigarettes: results of a national survey. Tob Control. 1996 Winter;5(4):265–270. doi: 10.1136/tc.5.4.265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kozlowski L. T., Goldberg M. E., Yost B. A., White E. L., Sweeney C. T., Pillitteri J. L. Smokers' misperceptions of light and ultra-light cigarettes may keep them smoking. Am J Prev Med. 1998 Jul;15(1):9–16. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00004-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kozlowski L. T., Heatherton T. F., Frecker R. C., Nolte H. E. Self-selected blocking of vents on low-yield cigarettes. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1989 Aug;33(4):815–819. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(89)90476-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kozlowski L. T., Pillitteri J. L., Sweeney C. T. Misuse of "light" cigarettes by means of vent blocking. J Subst Abuse. 1994;6(3):333–336. doi: 10.1016/s0899-3289(94)90524-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kozlowski L. T., Pope M. A., Lux J. E. Prevalence of the misuse of ultra-low-tar cigarettes by blocking filter vents. Am J Public Health. 1988 Jun;78(6):694–695. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.6.694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kozlowski L. T., Rickert W. S., Robinson J. C., Grunberg N. E. Have tar and nicotine yields of cigarettes changed? Science. 1980 Sep 26;209(4464):1550–1551. doi: 10.1126/science.7433979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kozlowski L. T. Tar and nicotine delivery of cigarettes. What a difference a puff makes. JAMA. 1981 Jan 9;245(2):158–159. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kozlowski L. T., White E. L., Sweeney C. T., Yost B. A., Ahern F. M., Goldberg M. E. Few smokers know their cigarettes have filter vents. Am J Public Health. 1998 Apr;88(4):681–682. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.4.681-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rickert W. S., Robinson J. C., Young J. C., Collishaw N. E., Bray D. F. A comparison of the yields of tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide of 36 brands of Canadian cigarettes tested under three conditions. Prev Med. 1983 Sep;12(5):682–694. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(83)90226-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Russell M. A., Jarvis M. J., Feyerabend C., Saloojee Y. Reduction of tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide intake in low tar smokers. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1986 Mar;40(1):80–85. doi: 10.1136/jech.40.1.80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Withey C. H., Papacosta A. O., Swan A. V., Fitzsimons B. A., Ellard G. A., Burney P. G., Colley J. R., Holland W. W. Respiratory effects of lowering tar and nicotine levels of cigarettes smoked by young male middle tar smokers. II. Results of a randomised controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1992 Jun;46(3):281–285. doi: 10.1136/jech.46.3.281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES