Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1999 Jul 20;96(15):8338–8343. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.15.8338

Resolution of concerted versus sequential mechanisms in photo-induced double-proton transfer reaction in 7-azaindole H-bonded dimer

Javier Catalán , Juan Carlos del Valle , Michael Kasha ‡,§
PMCID: PMC17518  PMID: 10411876

Abstract

The experimental and theoretical bases for a synchronous or concerted double-proton transfer in centro-symmetric H-bonded electronically excited molecular dimers are presented. The prototype model is the 7-azaindole dimer. New research offers confirmation of a concerted mechanism for excited-state biprotonic transfer. Recent femtosecond photoionization and coulombic explosion techniques have given rise to time-of-flight MS observations suggesting sequential two-step biprotonic transfer for the same dimer. We interpret the overall species observed in the time-of-flight experiments as explicable without conflict with the concerted mechanism of proton transfer.

Keywords: base pairs, photo-tautomerism


The doubly H-bonded dimer of 7-azaindole (7-AI) has been studied exhaustively as a model prototype for DNA base-pair tautomerization, as it is recognized to undergo a biprotonic transfer (1) on photoexcitation. A central issue in double-proton transfer (PT) reactions is whether a sequential (stepwise) or a concerted mechanism is applicable at the two proton-donor, proton-acceptor sites (2). A stepwise mechanism requires a reaction potential energy curve having an intermediate minimum between the potential minimum for the normal tautomer species, and that of the PT tautomer species, so that a finite lifetime for the transient intermediate species could be observed (3). Recent femtosecond MS results on 7-AI dimer produced in adiabatic expansion (4, 5) had been reported in supercooled molecular beams produced by adiabatic jet expansion, claiming to have established by fast transient kinetics a two-step PT mechanism for photo-excited 7-AI, with apparent theoretical calculation corroboration (6). Another laboratory (7) has made a claim of arresting the intermediate involving a one-PT in 7-AI dimer via a coulomb explosion technique, also in supercooled molecular beam experiments. We believe these results have been misinterpreted, and because they already are being accepted in some quarters (2, 8) as proven, we present refined calculations and experimental results to verify the concerted biprotonic transfer mechanism for 7-AI. Both of the jet expansion molecular beam experiments use severely invasive techniques (photoionization, coulomb explosion) to produce cationic species as required in the time-of-flight (TOF)-MS detection. We show that these laser photoionization procedures introduce a major perturbation on the electronic states of the molecular systems involved, and in effect, to create the cationic molecular species assumed to be an intermediate.

The development of femtosecond laser techniques now permits dynamic chemical events to be clocked at the picosecond and subpicosecond time scale. Consequently, a novel duality of criteria for molecular reaction mechanisms seems to have arisen: (a) the classical requirement with demonstration of an intermediate valley in a reaction potential energy curve, or (b) a (sub)picosecond observation of passage through an intermediate molecular configuration. Both of these could satisfy the Bridgman operational criterion (9) for physical reality, if characterization of the intermediate is ascertainable and the dynamics of the reaction falls within the limits imposed by the real system. We shall compare the two possibilities for the case of biprotonic phototautomerism.

The key molecule under consideration is 7-AI (Fig. 1B), selected (1) as a prototype model for a base-pair molecule, whose double-H-bonding dimer (Fig. 1D) could serve to mimic the DNA base pairs.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

7-AI species.

Much research on the fast-time dynamics of the double-PT in 7-AI dimers has been published, starting with the pioneering picosecond domain study by Hetherington, Micheels, and Eisenthal (10). The definitive femtosecond spectroscopic study by Takeuchi and Tahara (11, 12) on the double-PT of 7-AI dimers in solution and the comprehensive spectroscopic research by Fuke et al. (13, 14) on high-resolution spectra of 7-AI in super-cooled jet (gaseous) neutral molecular beams offer a detailed overview of the photophysics of excitation phenomena in this molecule and its H-bonded dimer.

The initial research (1) on 7-AI established the propensity of the molecule to dimerize in a hydrocarbon solution, exhibiting a (concentration-dependent) green second fluorescence band (λmax 475 nm), which replaces the UV-violet fluorescence band (λmax 330 nm), of the monomer. The assignment of the green fluorescence to the PT tautomer of the 7-AI dimer (pyrrolo-H transferred to the aza-N, Fig. 1D) was established by comparison with the spectroscopy of the N-methyl stabilized PT tautomer species (7-methyl-7-H-pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridine) of the 7-AI (15).

The Simultaneity Requirement

The driving force for the excited-state PT in 7-AI is the electronic rearrangement that occurs on excitation of the ground state (S0) to the first π-electron excited state (S1) of 7-AI. The calculated dipole moment changes from 1.61 D to 2.66 D, respectively (J.C., unpublished work), demonstrating an electronic density shift from the pyrrolo to the pyridine ring. This shift is clearly evident (Fig. 2) in the electronic distribution of the first excited molecular orbital (the now populated lowest unoccupied molecular orbital of the ground state configuration) in comparison with the electronic distribution of the highest occupied molecular orbital. This change in electronic distribution has the effect of increasing the acidity of the pyrrolo-N and simultaneously increasing the basicity of the pyridino-N. In the 7-AI doubly H-bonded dimer (Fig. 1D), the two protons thus are driven to exchange their covalent bonding to the formerly H-bonded N-atom synchronously or concertedly. The characterization concertedly applies only in the case wherein both molecules are excited simultaneously to the S1 state. The molecular orbitals for the ground state have been calculated at B3LYP/6–31G** levels with optimization of the molecular geometry. A full presentation of the calculation of charge distribution in various electronic states of 7-AI and resultant dipole moment, transition moment, and related properties will be provided elsewhere.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Molecular orbitals for the electronic transition S0 → S1a of the 7-AI H-bonded dimer [highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) to lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) excitation], showing large increase of the pyridino-N electron density. The dark vs. light shading correspond to different signs of the wave functions. The large increase in pyridino-N electron density on excitation also is seen in the second transition S0 → S1b of the 7-AI dimer.

The possibility of simultaneous excitation of the two bases to their S1 states was discussed in the first introduction of the 7-AI as a model molecule for DNA base-pairing (1). The simultaneous or coherent excitation of two neighboring molecules is treated by molecular exciton theory (16, 17). In the molecular exciton splitting, a vector model may be used for excited state dipole–dipole interaction, with two antiparallel transition dipoles (attractive array) representing the lower exciton state for the dimer, and two parallel transition dipoles (repulsive array) for the upper exciton state. The lower state (S1a, 2Ag) in the C2h geometry of the centro-symmetric planar H-bonded dimer is strictly electric-dipole forbidden for photon absorption from the ground state (S0, 1Ag). The upper exciton split level is S1b, Bu and is allowed as an electric-dipole photon absorption. The key observations on the reality of molecular exciton states were the definitive observation by Fuke et al. (13, 14) that, indeed, there is a two-photon allowed 1Ag → 2Ag (S0 → S1a) electronic excitation in 7-AI H-bonded dimer (super-cooled molecular beam), followed at slightly higher energy by a one-photon-allowed 1Ag → 1Bu (S0 → S1b) electronic excitation. This observation of a biphotonic lowest electronic transition in 7-AI dimer, followed by a normal one-photon-allowed transition, proves the existence of electronically coupled states in the dimer, i.e., that the 7-AI monomers are excited simultaneously in the dimer. As a consequence, all wave functions must be centro-symmetric for the dimer, and the driving force for concerted PT likewise should be centro-symmetric. This observation of a biphotonic absorption is the spectroscopic basis for a concerted biprotonic mechanism in the photo-excited 7-AI H-bonded dimer. In their second paper, Fuke and Kaya (14) also find a weak one-photon absorption with the same O,O origin band in the fluorescence excitation spectrum as the two-photon absorption. Those authors did not recognize the significance of their dual observations as both biphotonic and single-photon excitation. The biphotonic absorption is strong and unequivocal; a weak single-photon absorption represents a typical small relaxing of the strict exciton selection rules arising from a slight geometrical distortion of the dimer. The main component remains biphotonic for the lowest S0 → S1a transition.

The spectroscopic conditions necessary for stepwise or sequential double-PT would be as follows: For an A1A2 molecular 7-AI dimer in its ground state, first A1 of the pair must be excited A*1A2 so that the pyrrolo-H of A2 would be attracted to the molecule A*1; then in the second step A2 must be excited A*1A*2 so that the pyrrolo-H of A1 would be attracted to the molecule A*2. Such an electronic mechanism is contradicted directly by excitation principles for adjacent molecules of a dimer and by extensive empirical observation.

Biprotonic Transfer in Solution

The general excitonic rules prove to prevail in solution spectroscopy as well (see below). The necessity for synchronous double-PT is manifested also in tautomerization of 7-AI by protic-solvent catalysis. It was noted that simple alcohols catalyze tautomerization (1) of 7-AI, but that liquid water does not. The alcohols (e.g., methanol, ethanol) readily form a cyclical double-H-bonded solvate (1) with 7-AI, facilitating synchronous or concerted biprotonic transfer by the ultrarapid mutual induction effects of the coupled proton-donor, proton-acceptor site. In liquid water, H-bonded chains and clusters would offer ample proton-acceptor and proton-donor sites, but no monomeric H2O exists in liquid water, and the synchrony of proton-donor, proton-acceptor actions is missing. However, if monomeric H2O is produced by micro-addition of water to a nonprotic solvent such as ethyl ether, the monohydrate cyclical complex with 7-AI readily exhibits the green fluorescence of the PT dimer (1820). This and related experiments confirm the simultaneity requirement of concerted double-proton PT in the S1 excited state of 7-AI. Ab initio calculations on aquo-complexes of 7-AI have been carried out by Shukla and Mishra (21) and independently by Chaban and Gordon (22).

Theoretical Potential Energy Curve Calculations

For quantum theoretical calculations on complex polyatomic molecules, a series of approximation methods of increasing refinement is available. For 7-AI, four levels of approximation have been used. The essentiality and methods of inclusion of electron correlation effects have been reviewed penetratingly by Raghvachari and Anderson (23).

An early all-valence electron semiempirical calculation for the PT reaction potential for 7-AI was carried out (24), by using CNDO/2 for the S0 state geometry, followed by a configurational interaction determination of the S1-state Franck-Condon transition energy (CI-CNDO/2) based on the S0-CNDO/2 molecular orbitals. This calculation exhibited no intermediate potential minimum between the S0 and S′0 ground state tautomer minima (normal tautomer, and 7-H PT tautomer of 7-AI, respectively), nor for the corresponding excited-state (S1-S′1) PT reaction potential.

Douhal et al. (6) have used two independent ab initio (nonempirical) quantum mechanical methods to investigate the potential energy curve for the PT reactions in 7-AI. (a) The first calculations used the restricted Hartree-Fock (RHF) self-consistent field technique for the ground electronic state. Electron correlation is excluded by definition in the HF procedure, the correlation energy being defined quantitatively as the energy difference between the HF energy and the true energy of a system. The HF calculation, by its limited nature, cannot be considered sufficient for studying systems that possess hydrogen bonds in their molecular structure. It is known that molecular structures involved in a PT reaction process cannot be described adequately without including electronic correlation (25). Douhal et al. (6) calculated the first excited singlet state reaction potential for 7-AI dimer tautomerization by using a simple configurational interaction calculation over the RHF molecular structure. (b) In a second calculation by Douhal et al. (6), correlation energy correction was included by using the CIS-MP2, Møller-Plesset perturbation theory taken to second order. The calculations used a 4–31G basis set, with Gaussian-94 programs. The CIS-MP2 model is limited in its approach to full electron correlation energy and has proved unreliable in a related calculation, the potential energy surface for H-atom transfer reactions (26). The truncated basis set 4–31G is also a major limitation on the validity of the calculations presented by Douhal et al. (6).

The calculated reaction potential energy profiles published qualitatively (without any coordinate scales) as their figure 2 by Douhal et al. (6) are presented here (our Fig. 3) in corrected form. In their original form, the potential curves were shown to have an intermediate minimum. In this qualitative form, the curves have been taken as a corroboration (e.g., figure 1 in ref. 5) of the experimental results and encouraged the suggestion (7) of a two-step PT mechanism in 7-AI dimer. However, the curves drawn by Douhal et al. (6) do not correspond to the calculated numbers obtained by them. Introducing an energy scale on the ordinate (our Fig. 3) [based on 0–14.78 kcal/mole (min/max)] for the S1/S′1 potential (our labels), it is obvious that there is no excited state intermediate minimum for that calculation. The Douhal et al. reaction potential profile (undesignated in their figure 2) seems to be for the RHF calculation, as the authors remark further in the text that the Møller-Plesset (CIS-MP-2) calculations show no intermediate minimum. It is puzzling that Douhal et al. (6) chose to display the results of the inadequate RHF calculation, whereas the CIS-MP-2 improved calculations would approach a more realistic potential energy curve. The transition state “humps” TS1′ and TS2′ shown by Douhal et al. (6) may not exist as they seem to depend on arbitrary introduction of geometrical distortion or on a very difficult theoretical geometry optimization.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

PT reaction potential curves for 7-AI dimer. Solid curves as given by Douhal et al. (6) without scale calibration. Dashed curves corrected to correspond to published energy values of Douhal et al.

Hybrid density functional (HDF) theory calculations were carried out for the ground electronic state in the present research, by using configurational interaction for the excited-state potential energy curve, CIS-6–31G**/B3LYP/6–31G**, with S0 state geometry optimization. The concerted double-PT calculated potential for phototautomerism of 7-AI is given in Fig. 4. From the initial excited-state S1 minimum (S1a and S1b, labeled 2Ag and 1Bu) to the S′1 minimum (S′1b and S′1a, 1Bu and 2Ag) for the PT tautomer pair (H-bonded dimer of the 7-H tautomer) there is a single potential barrier (ca. 8.5 kcal/mol for the 2Ag state and 7.8 kcal/mol for the 1Bu). These theoretical potentials confirm the absence of an intermediate minimum and reinforce the biprotonic transfer mechanism in 7-AI as a concerted mechanism for simultaneous two-site bi-PT. The reliability of the HDF method is reinforced by the demonstration of reliability for an H-atom transfer reaction potential calculation (26), wherein the HDF results were preserved in the more refined quadratic configurational interaction (QCISD) calculation.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Franck-Condon excited-state (S1−S′1) potential energy PT reaction curve for 7-AI dimer (Fig. 1D) plotted from a HDF calculation for a concerted double-PT process of the 7-AI doubly H-bonded dimer (C2h).

The Ag and Bu symmetries (Fig. 4) are for the centro-symmetric C2h H-bonded dimer, corresponding to the excitonic split band (1) of the degenerate zero-order electronic excitonic states of the dimer pair, as discussed earlier. Analogously, HDF calculated potentials for a conjectured single PT in 7-AI dimers indicate a monotonic rise in the first PT potential from the S1 reaction minimum (Fig. 5, Left), and a monotonic descent for the second PT potential to the S′1 reaction minimum (Fig. 5, Right). The HDF calculation yields the same symmetries and ordering of the S1 and S′1 electronic state components as does the molecular exciton theory, without the point-dipole approximation and other limitations of the simple Davydov molecular exciton theory.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Stepwise PT reaction potentials (excited states S1−S′1) for 7-AI dimer plotted from a HDF calculation. (Left) Transfer of first proton from pyrrolo-N1 of lower 7-AI of Fig. 1D to pyridino-N7 of upper 7-AI. (Right) Transfer of second pyrrolo-H of upper 7-AI to pyridino-N7 of lower 7-AI of Fig. 1D.

In the stable normal tautomers of 7-AI, the pyrrolo-N has a pK for proton association (Fig. 1B) at least six pK units greater than that for the pyridino-N, whereas for the excited-state PT tautomer the pK ratio is reversed, with the 7-H tautomer (Fig. 1T) being stabilized (as a fleeting transient). However, in methyl alcohol/HCl solution the cation (Fig. 1C) is readily obtainable and its absorption and fluorescence (λmax 445 nm) spectra measured. Similarly, the analogous spectra of the anion (Fig. 1A) are observable for the DMSO/NaOH solution.

Observation of the cation (and anion) fluorescence spectra of 7-AI lying between the fluorescence bands for the neutral base 7-AI (Fig. 1B) and that for the PT-tautomer (Fig. 1T) might suggest that, e.g., the 7-AI cation (Fig. 1C) could be an intermediate single-PT species in the biprotonic transfer. This conclusion is deceptive, as a HDF calculation shows. The cation and anion (Fig. 1A) forms of 7-AI now have electronic states based on electronically perturbed molecular skeletons, which proves to be a very large perturbation. Fig. 6 presents the energy shifts in kcal⋅mole−1 for the cation and anion vs. the neutral base 7-AI. Although the HDF calculation can be considered, as are all excited-state quantum theoretical calculations on large polyatomic systems, of limited precision, Fig. 6 definitely illustrates that the cation ground state (in the presence of excess acid or H+) is so greatly lowered (≈29,000 cm−1) in energy relative to the ground state of the neutral molecule, that the cation formation would act as a trap for the double-PT if it were an intermediate. From this result, we would have to conclude that the formation of a cation as an intermediate in the excited-state double-PT is precluded in the case of 7-AI.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Skeletal electrostatic perturbation of the π-electron states of 7-AI. HDF calculated S0 and S1 state energies for the 7-AI neutral base (Fig. 1B), deprotonated anion (Fig. 1A), and protonated cation (Fig. 1C).

Femtosecond Researches on 7-AI PT

We turn to an examination of the experimental researches on 7-AI by the Zewail group. In the first paper (4), an adiabatic nozzle expansion producing a super-cooled (<1 K) gaseous molecular beam is used, in the following sequence of steps: (i) adiabatic nozzle expansion of 7-AI vapor in an inert carrier gas, (ii) UV (305–310 nm) femtosecond laser pulse excitation, (iii) a second timed-delay femtosecond laser pulse (ca. 620 nm) yielding photoionization of the 7-AI monomers and “dimers,” with a final step (4) of TOF mass spectrometric resolution. This technique immediately raises two questions: (a) what is the nature of the dimers produced, and (b) what molecular species remain after the photoionization? In the analogous adiabatic expansion researches by the Castleman group (7), the second step involves a greatly increased intensity of the 624-nm laser pulse, yielding a coulomb explosion of the species in the excited zone of the 7-AI molecular beam.

We shall discuss briefly the complexities inherent in the TOF technique. In the ultrafast adiabatic expansion from the free jet nozzle experiment, the monomeric molecules first are thermally volatilized in the presence of an inert carrier gas in the primary chamber, then escape via the expansion nozzle. Included among the dimer structures that could form in the super-cooled (<1 K) escaping gas would be van der Waals card-pack dimers in addition to doubly H-bonded, coplanar, centrosymmetric (C2h) dimers in the case of 7-AI, an additional statistical restriction arising from the severe geometrical requirement for the latter in the collisional approach. Second, the TOF technique as used (4, 5, 7) detects only (+)-charged ions. Thus (7-AI)+ monomers and (7-AI)(7-AI)+ electronically asymmetric dimers are detected, both as ion-radical species.

The outstanding result of the Castleman group research (7) was the observation of an ion-current peak for a mass-119 as a (7-AI)(H+) transient cation (Fig. 1C), in addition to the mass-118 normal molecule cation, 7-AIπ(+), the latter arising from π-electron ionization (Fig. 1π-C)of the companion molecule of the H-bonded dimer. The spectacular result of the coulomb explosion experiment is the extreme molecular fragmentation of a large part of the 7-AI species present: H+ or H2+, C+ and numerous radical-ion intermediate fragments are observed. The observation of simply ionized 7-AI and simply ionized (7-AI)2 dimers (single π-electron ejection) indicates that these species happily escaped the intense coulomb explosion field. The net difference evident between the Castleman group and Zewail group research results lies actually in the much greater number of simple π-electron ionizations in the Castleman et al. (7) research; the coulomb explosion appears to be a destructive interference, as a side effect.

The appearance of the 7-AI(H+) mass-119 species (Fig. 1C) in the report of Castleman et al. (7) would result directly from single-π-electron ionization of those 7-AI H-bonded coplanar dimers present. This asymmetric ionization of the dimer would localize the excitation to the neutral 7-AI of the pair, the H-bond then being repelled by the 7-AIπ(+) species (Fig. 1π-C), and at the same time the pyrrolo-H of the 7-AIπ(+) by its increased acidity would be readily released to the pyridino-N of the excited neutral molecule. There is then a necessity for the 7-AI(H+) cation to split off, leading to the observation of the mass-119, 7-AI(H+) species as given (7), precluding the second PT. This species would be an unstable transient with a very short lifetime. The remaining 7-AI mass-117 species is now a zwitterion: π-electron ionization leaves a (+) charge, and the pyrrole-H dissociation a localized (−) charge; the mass-117 species cannot appear in the cation mass spectra. Thus, it appears realistic to state that the mass-119 cation observed is directly created by the photoionization detection step required by the TOF technique.

We note that a π-electron ionization of 7-AI(H+) species would produce the 7-AIπ(+)(H+) double cation (Fig. 1π-D), also not detectable in the range of the experiment. Castleman et al. (7) did establish the fact that the source of the 7-AI(H+) cation was a 7-AI dimer. However, we would indicate that the various van der Waals card-pack dimers would be stabilized by (7-AIπ(+))(7-AI) dimer ionization, via ion-dipole interaction; these must be the mass-236 cations detected in the TOF mass spectra. We shall present a detailed analysis of the spectroscopy of van der Waals dimers elsewhere.

Thus, the TOF experiments of the Zewail (4) and Castleman (7) groups do not offer clear proof of intermediate single PT anion-cation 7-AI species in the PT reaction.

Supersonic jet-cooled 7-AI monomers and dimers as neutral molecular species were studied comprehensively at high-resolution electronic spectroscopy by Fuke et al. (13, 14). Their very detailed fluorescence and excitation spectral study established (a) the stringent need for coplanarity for double-PT in the H-bonded 7-AI dimer, (b) the dramatic effect, on PT, of the H-bond stretching mode, and (c) an electronic requirement for double-PT. The observation that the S1 excited-state double-PT rate in 7-AI dimer was three times the rate for the H-bonded heterodimer (7-AI)(7-azacarbazole) lends support to the mutual π-electron density enhancement requirement at the 7-H proton acceptor site. This latter observation adds to the argument for a concerted double-PT. In addition, the experimentally determined PT reaction potential surface presented has no suggestion of an intermediate minimum. The theoretical study of double-PT in the centro-symmetric double-H-bonded formamide dimer parallels the demonstration of the electronic basis for a concerted biprotonic transfer (27).

A femtosecond excitation dynamics preliminary study for 7-AI dimer in solution phase indicated a rise time for biprotonic-transfer tautomer formation of 1.4 ps (28). Femtosecond excitation dynamics of double-PT in H-bonded 7-AI dimers in hydrocarbon solution at 298 K were studied in the definitive spectroscopic research by Takeuchi and Tahara (11, 12). Their observed transition times and assignments are: τ1, 0.2 ± 0.1 ps, S2 → S1, internal conversion, deuterium independent; τ2, 1.1 ps, S1 → S′1, PT-tautomer rise time, 1.6 ps in N-D,N-D dimer; and τ′2, 12 ps, S′1(v) → S′1(0), vibrational cooling time, intramolecular vibrational relaxation.

The Zewail group (5) observed for 7-AI dimers in solution a similar range of ultrafast (0.6–0.2 ps) and a fast 1 ps (1.4–1.6 ps for deuterated N-D,N-D 7-AI dimers) transition rate. In addition, both groups observed a small component of a 12-ps slower rate. Takeuchi and Tahara (12) assigned this rate to vibrational cooling [intramolecular vibrational relaxation (IVR)] by analogy to established rates for IVR for analogous hydrocarbon molecules. The Zewail group (5) adopted the deficient RHF calculation results (6) for an intermediate reaction potential minimum (exaggerated in their figure 1) and interpreted all of their dynamics data accordingly. Takeuchi and Tahara (12) took full account of the exact 7-AI lowest molecular electronic states involved, analogous to the S1(Lb) and S2(La) states of iso-electronic naphthalene. Takeuchi and Tahara (12) omit the lower Ag excitonic state, preserving the upper Bu split components (1) (Fig. 3) of S1a and S1b, because the S0 (1Ag) → S1a (2Ag) transition is electric dipole forbidden and is observed as a biphotonic transition (13, 14) as we have discussed above. As the dipole moments are rotated in plane in the PT-tautomer excited state, the Ag and Bu components reverse order (compare Fig. 4). The S1a (2Ag) state metastability contributes to the tautomerization dynamics and is the state from which tautomerization occurs in the dimer (13, 14).

Conclusion

The excited-state biprotonic transfer process is fundamentally spectroscopic in origin, and we have offered an outline of the principles and spectroscopic observations involved. Kinetic observations made currently by ultrafast techniques have their origin in the many molecular species produced under different excitation conditions and the complexity of the spectroscopic states that result. It was essential to unravel the several species produced in the adiabatic cooling and photoionization experiment before the kinetic isotope results could be properly correlated.

In summary we observe that (i) anionic and cationic electronic states of 7-AI are shifted strongly in energy by the skeletal charge perturbation placing them out of range as intermediates for the double-PT reaction in the neutral molecule tautomer species. (ii) High-level quantum theoretical calculations indicate a low barrier for double-PT in 7-AI with no indication of an intermediate minimum. (iii) Femtosecond dynamics and spectroscopic studies of excited-state PT reactions, with defined H-bonded centro-symmetric coplanar dimers of 7-AI, are fully interpreted without assuming an ionic intermediate via single-PT steps.

Finally, if a femtosecond/picosecond intermediate actually was detected as a natural intermediate, it would have to survive long enough to be of genetic significance as a mutation event in a DNA base pair. The maximum rate of diffusion of nucleotides to DNA polymerase is estimated (29) to be 6,000 sec−1, and studies of replication rates in real biological systems (30, 31) are so far from the picosecond transient time scale as to make the ultrafast dynamical event not of genetic applicability.

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to Dirección General de Investigación Cientifica y Técnica of Spain for financial support. J.-C.V. is on leave from Universidad Autónoma de Madrid and thanks Florida State University for financial support.

ABBREVIATIONS

7-AI

7-azaindole

PT

proton transfer

RHF

restricted Hartree-Fock

HDF

hybrid density functional

TOF

time of flight

References

  • 1.Taylor C A, El-Bayoumi M A, Kasha M. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1969;63:253–260. doi: 10.1073/pnas.63.2.253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schowen R L. Angew Chem Int Engl Ed. 1997;36:1434–1438. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jencks W P. Acc Chem Res. 1980;13:161–169. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Douhal A, Kim S K, Zewail A H. Nature (London) 1995;378:260–263. doi: 10.1038/378260a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chachisvilis M, Fiebig T, Douhal A, Zewail A H. J Phys Chem A. 1998;102:669–673. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Douhal A, Guallar V, Moreno M, Lluch J M. Chem Phys Lett. 1996;267:370–376. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Folmer D E, Poth L, Wisniewski E S, Castleman A W., Jr Chem Phys Lett. 1998;287:1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Goodman M F. Nature (London) 1995;378:237–238. doi: 10.1038/378237a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bridgman P W. The Logic of Modern Physics. New York: Macmillan; 1927. p. 228. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hetherington III W M, Micheels R M, Eisenthal K B. Chem Phys Lett. 1979;66:230–233. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Takeuchi S, Tahara T. Chem Phys Lett. 1997;277:340–346. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Takeuchi S, Tahara T. J Phys Chem A. 1998;102:7740–7753. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fuke K, Yoshiuchi H, Kaya K. J Phys Chem. 1984;88:5840–5844. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fuke K, Kaya K. J Phys Chem. 1989;93:614–621. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Robison M M, Robison B L. J Am Chem Soc. 1955;77:6554–6559. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McRae E G, Kasha M. In: Physical Processes in Radiation Biology. Augenstein L, Mason R, Rosenberg B, editors. New York: Academic; 1964. pp. 23–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kasha M, Rawls H R, El-Bayoumi M A. Pure Appl Chem. 1965;11:371–392. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kasha M. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans. 1986;82:2379–2392. , and references therein. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Collins S T. Ph.D. thesis. Tallahassee: Florida State University; 1982. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chou P-T, Martinez M L, Cooper W C, McMorrow D, Collins S T, Kasha M. J Phys Chem. 1992;96:5203–5205. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shukla M K, Mishra P C. Chem Phys. 1998;230:187–200. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chaban G M, Gordon M S. J Phys Chem. 1999;103:185–189. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Raghavachari K, Anderson J B. J Phys Chem. 1996;100:12960–12073. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Catalán J, Pérez P. J Theor Biol. 1979;81:213–221. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(79)90161-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Catalán J, Palomar J, de Paz J L G. J Phys Chem. 1997;101:7914–7921. , and references therein. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cioslowski J, Piskorz P, Moncrieff D. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:1695–1700. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kim Y, Lim S, Kim H-J, Kim Y. J Phys Chem. 1999;103:617–624. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Share P, Pereira M, Sarisky M, Repinec S, Hochstrasser R M. J Lumin. 1991;48/49:204–208. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schlief R. Genetics and Molecular Biology. 2nd Ed. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press; 1993. pp. 76–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chandler M, Bird R, Caro L. J Mol Biol. 1975;94:127–132. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(75)90410-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Manor H, Deutscher M, Littauer V. J Mol Biol. 1971;61:503–524. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90062-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES