Skip to main content
PMC home page
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases logoLink to Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
. 1999 Jan;58(1):27–34. doi: 10.1136/ard.58.1.27

Thickness of human articular cartilage in joints of the lower limb

D Shepherd 1, B Seedhom 1
PMCID: PMC1752762  PMID: 10343537

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—(a) To determine the topographical variations in cartilage thickness over the entire surfaces of cadaveric lower limb joints, and (b) to examine the correlations between: cartilage thickness and its site specific modulus; cartilage thickness and donor age, weight, height, and body mass index.
METHODS—The cartilage thickness of 11 sets of cadaveric human joints each comprising an ankle, knee, and hip was measured using a needle probe technique. Statistical analysis was used to compare the cartilage thickness of the different lower limb joints and the differences in cartilage thickness over the surface of individual joints. It was further examined whether cartilage had a correlation with its stiffness, and any of the details of the specimen donors such as age, weight, height, and body mass index.
RESULTS—The mean cartilage thickness of the knee was significantly greater than that of the ankle and hip (p<0.001) in all 11 sets of joints, while the cartilage thickness of the hip was significantly greater than that of the ankle in 10 sets of joints (p<0.001). The mass of specimen donors was found to correlate with the mean cartilage thickness of all three lower limb joints. A correlation was also found between the height of donors and the mean cartilage thickness of the knee and hip joints, while only in the ankle joint was a correlation found between the mean cartilage thickness and the body mass index of the specimen donors. A further correlation was found between cartilage thickness and its modulus; the thinner the cartilage, the higher the modulus.
CONCLUSIONS—The thickness of articular cartilage seems to be related to the congruance of a joint; thin cartilage is found in congruent joints such as the ankle, whereas thick cartilage is found in incongruent joints such as the knee. The correlations in this study imply that the larger and heavier was a donor the thicker was the cartilage in the lower limb joints. The data further suggest the presence of an inverse relation between the mean cartilage thickness and mean compressive modulus in each of the joints examined.

 Keywords: articular cartilage; hip; knee; ankle

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (159.3 KB).

Figure 1  .

Figure 1  

Open in a new tab

Response of load and displacement transducers for cartilage thickness measurement.

Figure 2  .

Figure 2  

Open in a new tab

Distinct areas of the lower limb joints (A, B, C: posterior, superior, and anterior areas of the acetabulum respectively; D, E, F, G: superior, anterior, and posterior areas of the femoral head respectively; H, I: patellar surface and femoral condyles respectively; J, K: tibial areas of the knee covered by the menisci and those that come into direct contact with the femur respectively; L, M: talar and tibial areas of the ankle respectively).

Figure 3  .

Figure 3  

Open in a new tab

Variation of mean cartilage thickness of the lower limb joints with details of the specimen donors. (A) age, (B) mass, (C) height, (D) body mass index.

Figure 4  .

Figure 4  

Open in a new tab

Variation of cartilage thickness modulus. (A) Each ankle, knee, and hip, (B) each site on all ankles, (C) each site on all knees, (D) each site on all hips.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Armstrong C. G., Gardner D. L. Thickness and distribution of human femoral head articular cartilage. Changes with age. Ann Rheum Dis. 1977 Oct;36(5):407–412. doi: 10.1136/ard.36.5.407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Athanasiou K. A., Agarwal A., Dzida F. J. Comparative study of the intrinsic mechanical properties of the human acetabular and femoral head cartilage. J Orthop Res. 1994 May;12(3):340–349. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100120306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Athanasiou K. A., Rosenwasser M. P., Buckwalter J. A., Malinin T. I., Mow V. C. Interspecies comparisons of in situ intrinsic mechanical properties of distal femoral cartilage. J Orthop Res. 1991 May;9(3):330–340. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100090304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eckstein F., Adam C., Sittek H., Becker C., Milz S., Schulte E., Reiser M., Putz R. Non-invasive determination of cartilage thickness throughout joint surfaces using magnetic resonance imaging. J Biomech. 1997 Mar;30(3):285–289. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(97)81146-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hall F. M., Wyshak G. Thickness of articular cartilage in the normal knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980 Apr;62(3):408–413. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jurvelin J. S., Räsänen T., Kolmonen P., Lyyra T. Comparison of optical, needle probe and ultrasonic techniques for the measurement of articular cartilage thickness. J Biomech. 1995 Feb;28(2):231–235. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(94)00060-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jurvelin J., Kiviranta I., Arokoski J., Tammi M., Helminen H. J. Indentation study of the biochemical properties of articular cartilage in the canine knee. Eng Med. 1987 Jan;16(1):15–22. doi: 10.1243/emed_jour_1987_016_006_02. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kempson G. E., Freeman M. A., Swanson S. A. The determination of a creep modulus for articular cartilage from indentation tests of the human femoral head. J Biomech. 1971 Jul;4(4):239–250. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(71)90030-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kladny B., Bail H., Swoboda B., Schiwy-Bochat H., Beyer W. F., Weseloh G. Cartilage thickness measurement in magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1996 Sep;4(3):181–186. doi: 10.1016/s1063-4584(96)80014-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Modest V. E., Murphy M. C., Mann R. W. Optical verification of a technique for in situ ultrasonic measurement of articular cartilage thickness. J Biomech. 1989;22(2):171–176. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(89)90041-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Myers S. L., Dines K., Brandt D. A., Brandt K. D., Albrecht M. E. Experimental assessment by high frequency ultrasound of articular cartilage thickness and osteoarthritic changes. J Rheumatol. 1995 Jan;22(1):109–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Parsons J. R., Black J. The viscoelastic shear behavior of normal rabbit articular cartilage. J Biomech. 1977;10(1):21–29. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(77)90026-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rushfeldt P. D., Mann R. W., Harris W. H. Improved techniques for measuring in vitro the geometry and pressure distribution in the human acetabulum--I. Ultrasonic measurement of acetabular surfaces, sphericity and cartilage thickness. J Biomech. 1981;14(4):253–260. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(81)90070-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Shepherd D. E., Seedhom B. B. A technique for measuring the compressive modulus of articular cartilage under physiological loading rates with preliminary results. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 1997;211(2):155–165. doi: 10.1243/0954411971534278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Simon W. H., Friedenberg S., Richardson S. Joint congruence. A correlation of joint congruence and thickness of articular cartilage in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973 Dec;55(8):1614–1620. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Simon W. H. Scale effects in animal joints. I. Articular cartilage thickness and compressive stress. Arthritis Rheum. 1970 May-Jun;13(3):244–256. doi: 10.1002/art.1780130305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Simon W. H. Scale effects in animal joints. II. Thickness and elasticity in the deformability of articular cartilage. Arthritis Rheum. 1971 Jul-Aug;14(4):493–502. doi: 10.1002/art.1780140409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Swann A. C., Seedhom B. B. Improved techniques for measuring the indentation and thickness of articular cartilage. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 1989;203(3):143–150. doi: 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1989_203_026_01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES