Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases logoLink to Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
. 1999 Apr;58(4):214–219. doi: 10.1136/ard.58.4.214

Clinical features and outcome of septic arthritis in a single UK Health District 1982-1991

V Weston 1, A Jones 1, N Bradbury 1, F Fawthrop 1, M Doherty 1
PMCID: PMC1752863  PMID: 10364899

Abstract

AIMS—To determine the clinical features of a large number of unselected UK hospital patients with confirmed septic arthritis and to determine those features associated with a poor outcome.
STUDY DESIGN—Retrospective, case-note survey. 
SETTING—A single English Health District.
PATIENTS—All patients admitted to hospital in Nottingham during the period 1 January 1982 to 31 December 1991 with confirmed septic arthritis were included. 
OUTCOME MEASURES—Death, osteomyelitis and recorded functional impairment. 
RESULTS—The spectrum of causative organisms remains similar to that seen in previous studies with the Gram positive organisms Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococci responsible for 74% of cases, gonococcal infections though were less common. Culture of joint aspirates and or blood were positive in 82% of cases, with the Gram stain demonstrating the causative organism in 50% of cases. Pre-existing joint disease was evident in 35% of cases. The mortality remains high at 11.5% with a significant additional morbidity of 31.6%. Multivariate analysis suggests that important predictors of death are: confusion at presentation, age ⩾65 years, multiple joint sepsis or involvement of the elbow joint, and of morbidity are: age ⩾ 65 years, diabetes mellitus, open surgical drainage, and Gram positive infections other than S aureus.
CONCLUSIONS—Septic arthritis continues to be associated with a considerable degree of morbidity and mortality. These results confirm the importance of obtaining synovial fluid and blood for culture before starting antimicrobial treatment. The apparent poorer outcome found with surgical intervention is in line with some previous suggestions but should be interpreted with caution in light of the retrospective nature of this study.

 Keywords: septic arthritis; surgical drainage

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (113.5 KB).

Figure 1  .

Figure 1  

Open in a new tab

Age distribution of patients with septic arthritis.

Figure 2  .

Figure 2  

Open in a new tab

Distribution of ESR and CRP measurements in patients presenting with septic arthritis. Eight patients had an ESR in the normal range (<10 mm 1st h); three had a CRP within the normal range (<20 mg/ml).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Black J., Hunt T. L., Godley P. J., Matthew E. Oral antimicrobial therapy for adults with osteomyelitis or septic arthritis. J Infect Dis. 1987 May;155(5):968–972. doi: 10.1093/infdis/155.5.968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cooper C., Cawley M. I. Bacterial arthritis in an English health district: a 10 year review. Ann Rheum Dis. 1986 Jun;45(6):458–463. doi: 10.1136/ard.45.6.458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Goldenberg D. L., Brandt K. D., Cohen A. S., Cathcart E. S. Treatment of septic arthritis: comparison of needle aspiration and surgery as initial modes of joint drainage. Arthritis Rheum. 1975 Jan-Feb;18(1):83–90. doi: 10.1002/art.1780180116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ho G., Jr Bacterial arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1993 Jul;5(4):449–453. doi: 10.1097/00002281-199305040-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hook E. W. Septic gonococcal arthritis is much more common in the USA than in the UK. Br J Rheumatol. 1990 Aug;29(4):283–283. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/29.4.283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kaandorp C. J., Dinant H. J., van de Laar M. A., Moens H. J., Prins A. P., Dijkmans B. A. Incidence and sources of native and prosthetic joint infection: a community based prospective survey. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997 Aug;56(8):470–475. doi: 10.1136/ard.56.8.470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kaandorp C. J., Krijnen P., Moens H. J., Habbema J. D., van Schaardenburg D. The outcome of bacterial arthritis: a prospective community-based study. Arthritis Rheum. 1997 May;40(5):884–892. doi: 10.1002/art.1780400516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kaandorp C. J., Van Schaardenburg D., Krijnen P., Habbema J. D., van de Laar M. A. Risk factors for septic arthritis in patients with joint disease. A prospective study. Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Dec;38(12):1819–1825. doi: 10.1002/art.1780381215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Morgan D. S., Fisher D., Merianos A., Currie B. J. An 18 year clinical review of septic arthritis from tropical Australia. Epidemiol Infect. 1996 Dec;117(3):423–428. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800059070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Newman J. H. Review of septic arthritis throughout the antibiotic era. Ann Rheum Dis. 1976 Jun;35(3):198–205. doi: 10.1136/ard.35.3.198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Peters R. H., Rasker J. J., Jacobs J. W., Prevo R. L., Karthaus R. P. Bacterial arthritis in a district hospital. Clin Rheumatol. 1992 Sep;11(3):351–355. doi: 10.1007/BF02207192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ryan M. J., Kavanagh R., Wall P. G., Hazleman B. L. Bacterial joint infections in England and Wales: analysis of bacterial isolates over a four year period. Br J Rheumatol. 1997 Mar;36(3):370–373. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/36.3.370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sharp J. T., Lidsky M. D., Duffy J., Duncan M. W. Infectious arthritis. Arch Intern Med. 1979 Oct;139(10):1125–1130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Syrogiannopoulos G. A., Nelson J. D. Duration of antimicrobial therapy for acute suppurative osteoarticular infections. Lancet. 1988 Jan 2;1(8575-6):37–40. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)91013-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES