Abstract
OBJECTIVES—To investigate the accuracy of placement of epidural injections using the lumbar and caudal approaches. To identify which factors, if any, predicted successful placement. METHODS—200 consecutive patients referred to a pain clinic for an epidural injection of steroid were randomly allocated to one of two groups. Group L had a lumbar approach to the epidural space and group C a caudal approach to the epidural space. Both groups then had epidurography performed using Omnipaque and an image intensifier to determine the position of the needle. RESULTS—Body mass index (BMI), grade of operator, and route of injection were predictors of a successful placement. 93% of lumbar and 64% of caudal epidural injections were correctly placed (p< 0.001). 97% of lumbar and 85% of caudal epidural injections clinically thought to be correctly placed were confirmed radiographically. For epidural injections where the clinical impression was "maybe", 91% of lumbar injections, but only 45% of caudal injections were correctly placed. Obesity was associated with a reduced chance of successful placement (odds ratio (OR) 0.34 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17 to 0.72) BMI >30 v BMI <30). A more senior grade of operator was associated with a reduced chance of successful placement (OR 0.16 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.89) consultant v other). However, small numbers may have accounted for the latter result. CONCLUSIONS—The weight of the patient and intended approach need to be considered when deciding the method used to enter the epidural space. In the non-obese patient, lumbar epidural injections can be accurately placed without x ray screening, but caudal epidural injections, to be placed accurately, require x ray screening no matter what the weight of the patient.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (108.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Collier C. B. Why obstetric epidurals fail: a study of epidurograms. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1996 Jan;5(1):19–31. doi: 10.1016/s0959-289x(96)80070-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dearlove O., Walker R. W., Bigeon J. Y. The 'whoosh' test and caudal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1998 Aug;53(8):829–829. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.0584m.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eastwood D., Williams C., Buchan I. Caudal epidurals: the whoosh test. Anaesthesia. 1998 Mar;53(3):305–307. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00327.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fredman B., Nun M. B., Zohar E., Iraqi G., Shapiro M., Gepstein R., Jedeikin R. Epidural steroids for treating "failed back surgery syndrome": is fluoroscopy really necessary? Anesth Analg. 1999 Feb;88(2):367–372. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Renfrew D. L., Moore T. E., Kathol M. H., el-Khoury G. Y., Lemke J. H., Walker C. W. Correct placement of epidural steroid injections: fluoroscopic guidance and contrast administration. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991 Sep-Oct;12(5):1003–1007. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rydevik B., Brown M. D., Lundborg G. Pathoanatomy and pathophysiology of nerve root compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1984 Jan-Feb;9(1):7–15. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198401000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- White A. H., Derby R., Wynne G. Epidural injections for the diagnosis and treatment of low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1980 Jan-Feb;5(1):78–86. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198001000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- White A. H. Injection techniques for the diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am. 1983 Jul;14(3):553–567. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- el-Khoury G. Y., Ehara S., Weinstein J. N., Montgomery W. J., Kathol M. H. Epidural steroid injection: a procedure ideally performed with fluoroscopic control. Radiology. 1988 Aug;168(2):554–557. doi: 10.1148/radiology.168.2.2969118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]