Skip to main content
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases logoLink to Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
. 2000 Aug;59(8):580–582. doi: 10.1136/ard.59.8.580

What competence does a rheumatologist need?: an international perspective

B Amor 1
PMCID: PMC1753218  PMID: 10913050

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—To forecast, on the basis of the past and present position of rheumatologists in Europe, the competence needed in the future to secure and promote the specialty within the healthcare network.
METHODS—Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes/European Board of Rheumatology (UEMS/EBR) questionnaire on (a) training centres in Europe, (b) rheumatologists' skills, (c) UEMS core curriculum.
RESULTS—173 training centres in rheumatology were identified. Reponses to the questionnaire showed both harmony and diversity in the practice of rheumatology. Harmony arises from the need to (a) have an extensive and profound knowledge of, and clinical experience with, all the causes of painful or disabled locomotor apparatus; (b) manage such disorders in the most cost effective way; and (c) promote "shared clinical decision making". The diversity seen both among and within the European countries is due to the different activities of rheumatologists.
CONCLUSION—Rheumatological competence must be based on a common core, as described in the UEMS core curriculum, and on deeper and diverse clinical or scientific knowledge covering the entire field of the specialty, to secure its flexibility and resilience in the market place and to promote its scientific development.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (91.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amor B. A survey of rheumatology training centers in France. Rev Rhum Engl Ed. 1996 Jul-Sep;63(7-8):493–497. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carr A. J., Donovan J. L. Why doctors and patients disagree. Br J Rheumatol. 1998 Jan;37(1):1–4. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/37.1.1a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Isenberg D. A., Maini R. N. The consequences of the Calman Report on academic rheumatology. Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Jul;35(7):608–610. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/35.7.608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. McDonagh J. E. Rheumatology outpatient training: time for a re-think? Ann Rheum Dis. 1997 Dec;56(12):701–704. doi: 10.1136/ard.56.12.701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Pisetsky D. S., White B. A college for its teachers. Arthritis Rheum. 1999 Apr;42(4):595–598. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199904)42:4<595::AID-ANR1>3.0.CO;2-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Swannell A. J. Specialist training into the new millennium: the price of conformity with Europe. Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Jul;35(7):607–608. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/35.7.607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES