Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases logoLink to Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
. 2003 Nov;62(11):1061–1065. doi: 10.1136/ard.62.11.1061

Development of radiographic changes of osteoarthritis in the “Chingford knee” reflects progression of disease or non-standardised positioning of the joint rather than incident disease

S Mazzuca 1, K Brandt 1, N German 1, K Buckwalter 1, K Lane 1, B Katz 1
PMCID: PMC1754367  PMID: 14583568

Abstract

Objective: To ascertain the extent to which the "Chingford knee" (that is, contralateral knee of the middle aged, obese, female patient with unilateral knee osteoarthritis (OA)) is a high risk radiographically normal joint as opposed to a knee in which radiographic changes of OA would have been apparent in a more extensive radiographic examination.

Methods: Subjects were 180 obese women, aged 45–64 years, with unilateral knee OA, based on the standing anteroposterior (AP) view. Subjects underwent a series of radiographic knee examinations: semiflexed AP, supine lateral, and Hughston (patellofemoral (PF)) views. Bony changes of OA were graded by consensus of two readers. Medial tibiofemoral joint space width was measured by digital image analysis. Knee pain was assessed by the WOMAC OA Index after washout of all OA pain drugs.

Results: Despite the absence of evidence of knee OA in the standing AP radiograph, only 32 knees (18%) were radiographically normal in all other views. Ninety four knees (52%) exhibited TF knee OA in the semiflexed AP and/or lateral view. PF OA was seen in 121 knees (67%). Subjects with PF OA reported more severe knee pain than those without PF OA (mean WOMAC scores 9.9 v 8.3, p<0.05).

Conclusion: The Chingford knee is not a radiographically normal joint. The high rate of incidence of OA reported previously for this knee (∼50% within two years) may also reflect progression of existing OA or changes in radioanatomical positioning at follow up that showed evidence of stable disease that was present at baseline.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.5 MB).

Figure 1 .

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Contralateral knee in which no evidence of marginal osteophytes was apparent in the standing AP view (A). Note the large marginal osteophyte (arrow) and advanced joint space narrowing in the concurrent semiflexed AP view of the same knee (B).

Figure 2 .

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Grade 1 osteophytosis (arrow) at the superior or inferior pole of the posterior aspect of the patella (A) was not associated with increased severity of pain in the contralateral knee, in comparison with that in subjects in whom the contralateral knee was radiographically normal in all views. In contrast, subjects in whom the contralateral knee exhibited grade 2 or more patellar osteophytosis (B, arrow) reported significantly greater knee pain than subjects who did not have PF OA.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altman R. D., Hochberg M., Murphy W. A., Jr, Wolfe F., Lequesne M. Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1995 Sep;3 (Suppl A):3–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Altman R., Asch E., Bloch D., Bole G., Borenstein D., Brandt K., Christy W., Cooke T. D., Greenwald R., Hochberg M. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum. 1986 Aug;29(8):1039–1049. doi: 10.1002/art.1780290816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bellamy N., Buchanan W. W., Goldsmith C. H., Campbell J., Stitt L. W. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988 Dec;15(12):1833–1840. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Buckland-Wright C. Protocols for precise radio-anatomical positioning of the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral compartments of the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1995 Sep;3 (Suppl A):71–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carson W. G., Jr, James S. L., Larson R. L., Singer K. M., Winternitz W. W. Patellofemoral disorders: physical and radiographic evaluation. Part II: Radiographic examination. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984 May;(185):178–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cicuttini F. M., Baker J., Hart D. J., Spector T. D. Association of pain with radiological changes in different compartments and views of the knee joint. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1996 Jun;4(2):143–147. doi: 10.1016/s1063-4584(05)80323-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cicuttini F. M., Spector T., Baker J. Risk factors for osteoarthritis in the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints of the knee. J Rheumatol. 1997 Jun;24(6):1164–1167. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Davis M. A., Ettinger W. H., Neuhaus J. M., Cho S. A., Hauck W. W. The association of knee injury and obesity with unilateral and bilateral osteoarthritis of the knee. Am J Epidemiol. 1989 Aug;130(2):278–288. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dieppe P., Cushnaghan J., Young P., Kirwan J. Prediction of the progression of joint space narrowing in osteoarthritis of the knee by bone scintigraphy. Ann Rheum Dis. 1993 Aug;52(8):557–563. doi: 10.1136/ard.52.8.557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dougados M., Nguyen M., Berdah L., Maziéres B., Vignon E., Lequesne M., ECHODIAH Investigators Study Group Evaluation of the structure-modifying effects of diacerein in hip osteoarthritis: ECHODIAH, a three-year, placebo-controlled trial. Evaluation of the Chondromodulating Effect of Diacerein in OA of the Hip. Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Nov;44(11):2539–2547. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200111)44:11<2539::aid-art434>3.0.co;2-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Elahi S., Cahue S., Felson D. T., Engelman L., Sharma L. The association between varus-valgus alignment and patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Aug;43(8):1874–1880. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200008)43:8<1874::AID-ANR25>3.0.CO;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hochberg M. C., Altman R. D., Brandt K. D., Clark B. M., Dieppe P. A., Griffin M. R., Moskowitz R. W., Schnitzer T. J. Guidelines for the medical management of osteoarthritis. Part II. Osteoarthritis of the knee. American College of Rheumatology. Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Nov;38(11):1541–1546. doi: 10.1002/art.1780381104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. KELLGREN J. H., LAWRENCE J. S. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957 Dec;16(4):494–502. doi: 10.1136/ard.16.4.494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lanyon P., O'Reilly S., Jones A., Doherty M. Radiographic assessment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in the community: definitions and normal joint space. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998 Oct;57(10):595–601. doi: 10.1136/ard.57.10.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Link Thomas M., Steinbach Lynne S., Ghosh Srinka, Ries Michael, Lu Ying, Lane Nancy, Majumdar Sharmila. Osteoarthritis: MR imaging findings in different stages of disease and correlation with clinical findings. Radiology. 2003 Feb;226(2):373–381. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2262012190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lynch J. A., Buckland-Wright J. C., Macfarlane D. G. Precision of joint space width measurement in knee osteoarthritis from digital image analysis of high definition macroradiographs. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1993 Oct;1(4):209–218. doi: 10.1016/s1063-4584(05)80327-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mazzuca S. A., Brandt K. D., Dieppe P. A., Doherty M., Katz B. P., Lane K. A. Effect of alignment of the medial tibial plateau and x-ray beam on apparent progression of osteoarthritis in the standing anteroposterior knee radiograph. Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Aug;44(8):1786–1794. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200108)44:8<1786::AID-ART315>3.0.CO;2-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nagaosa Y., Lanyon P., Doherty M. Characterisation of size and direction of osteophyte in knee osteoarthritis: a radiographic study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Apr;61(4):319–324. doi: 10.1136/ard.61.4.319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Recommendations for the medical management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: 2000 update. American College of Rheumatology Subcommittee on Osteoarthritis Guidelines. Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Sep;43(9):1905–1915. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200009)43:9<1905::AID-ANR1>3.0.CO;2-P. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sharif M., George E., Shepstone L., Knudson W., Thonar E. J., Cushnaghan J., Dieppe P. Serum hyaluronic acid level as a predictor of disease progression in osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Jun;38(6):760–767. doi: 10.1002/art.1780380608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sharif M., Saxne T., Shepstone L., Kirwan J. R., Elson C. J., Heinegård D., Dieppe P. A. Relationship between serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein levels and disease progression in osteoarthritis of the knee joint. Br J Rheumatol. 1995 Apr;34(4):306–310. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/34.4.306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Smith G. N., Jr, Yu L. P., Jr, Brandt K. D., Capello W. N. Oral administration of doxycycline reduces collagenase and gelatinase activities in extracts of human osteoarthritic cartilage. J Rheumatol. 1998 Mar;25(3):532–535. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Spector T. D., Hart D. J., Doyle D. V. Incidence and progression of osteoarthritis in women with unilateral knee disease in the general population: the effect of obesity. Ann Rheum Dis. 1994 Sep;53(9):565–568. doi: 10.1136/ard.53.9.565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES