Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases logoLink to Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
. 2003 Jun;62(6):519–525. doi: 10.1136/ard.62.6.519

Radiographic assessment of sacroiliitis by radiologists and rheumatologists: does training improve quality?

A van Tubergen 1, L Heuft-Dorenbosch 1, G Schulpen 1, R Landewe 1, R Wijers 1, D van der Heijde 1, J van Engelshoven 1, S van der Linden 1
PMCID: PMC1754576  PMID: 12759287

Abstract

Objective: To assess performance of radiologists and rheumatologists in detecting sacroiliitis

Methods: 100 rheumatologists and 23 radiologists participated. One set of films was used for each assessment, another for training, and the third for confidence judgment. Films of HLA-B27+ patients with AS were used to assess sensitivity. For specificity films of healthy HLA-B27- relatives were included. Plain sacroiliac (SI) films with simultaneously taken computed tomographic scans (CTs) were used for confidence judgment. Three months after reading the training set, sensitivity and specificity assessments were repeated. Next, participants attended a workshop. They also rated 26 SI radiographs and 26 CTs for their trust in each judgment. Three months later final assessments were done.

Results: Sensitivity (84.3%/79.8%) and specificity (70.6%/74.7%) for radiologists and rheumatologists were comparable. Rheumatologists showed 6.3% decrease in sensitivity after self education (p=0.001), but 3.0% better specificity (p=0.008). The decrease in sensitivity reversed after the workshop. Difference in sensitivity three months after the workshop and baseline was only 0.5%. Sensitivity <50% occurred in 13% of participants. Only a few participants showed changes of >5% in both sensitivity and specificity. Intraobserver agreement for sacroiliitis grade 1 or 2 ranged from 65% to 100%. Sensitivity for CT (86%) was higher than for plain films (72%) (p<0.001) with the same specificity (84%). Confidence ratings for correctly diagnosing presence (7.7) or absence (8.3) of sacroiliitis were somewhat higher than incorrectly diagnosing the presence (6.6) or absence (7.4) of sacroiliitis (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Radiologists and rheumatologists show modest sensitivity and specificity for sacroiliitis and sizeable intraobserver variation. Overall, neither individual training nor workshops improved performance.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (222.9 KB).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Flow chart of participants and examinations.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Battafarano D. F., West S. G., Rak K. M., Fortenbery E. J., Chantelois A. E. Comparison of bone scan, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of active sacroiliitis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1993 Dec;23(3):161–176. doi: 10.1016/s0049-0172(05)80037-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blum U., Buitrago-Tellez C., Mundinger A., Krause T., Laubenberger J., Vaith P., Peter H. H., Langer M. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detection of active sacroiliitis--a prospective study comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, and contrast enhanced MRI. J Rheumatol. 1996 Dec;23(12):2107–2115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Braun J., Bollow M., Eggens U., König H., Distler A., Sieper J. Use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging with fast imaging in the detection of early and advanced sacroiliitis in spondylarthropathy patients. Arthritis Rheum. 1994 Jul;37(7):1039–1045. doi: 10.1002/art.1780370709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Braun J., Bollow M., Sieper J. Radiologic diagnosis and pathology of the spondyloarthropathies. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1998 Nov;24(4):697–735. doi: 10.1016/s0889-857x(05)70038-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Braun J., Sieper J., Bollow M. Imaging of sacroiliitis. Clin Rheumatol. 2000;19(1):51–57. doi: 10.1007/s100670050011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Docherty P., Mitchell M. J., MacMillan L., Mosher D., Barnes D. C., Hanly J. G. Magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of sacroiliitis. J Rheumatol. 1992 Mar;19(3):393–401. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fenton P. Magnetic resonance imaging of the sacroiliac joints: worth the cost? J Rheumatol. 1996 Dec;23(12):2020–2021. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gorter S., van der Linden S., Brauer J., van der Heijde D., Houben H., Rethans J. J., Scherpbier A., van der Vleuten C., Boonen A., Dinant H. Rhemulatologists' performance in dailiy practice. Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Feb;45(1):16–27. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200102)45:1<16::AID-ANR79>3.0.CO;2-W. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hollingsworth P. N., Cheah P. S., Dawkins R. L., Owen E. T., Calin A., Wood P. H. Observer variation in grading sacroiliac radiographs in HLA-B27 positive individuals. J Rheumatol. 1983 Apr;10(2):247–254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Khan M. A., van der Linden S. M., Kushner I., Valkenburg H. A., Cats A. Spondylitic disease without radiologic evidence of sacroiliitis in relatives of HLA-B27 positive ankylosing spondylitis patients. Arthritis Rheum. 1985 Jan;28(1):40–43. doi: 10.1002/art.1780280107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Murphey M. D., Wetzel L. H., Bramble J. M., Levine E., Simpson K. M., Lindsley H. B. Sacroiliitis: MR imaging findings. Radiology. 1991 Jul;180(1):239–244. doi: 10.1148/radiology.180.1.2052702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ryan L. M., Carrera G. F., Lightfoot R. W., Jr, Hoffman R. G., Kozin F. The radiographic diagnosis of sacroiliitis. A comparison of different views with computed tomograms of the sacroiliac joint. Arthritis Rheum. 1983 Jun;26(6):760–763. doi: 10.1002/art.1780260609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Taylor H. G., Wardle T., Beswick E. J., Dawes P. T. The relationship of clinical and laboratory measurements to radiological change in ankylosing spondylitis. Br J Rheumatol. 1991 Oct;30(5):330–335. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/30.5.330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Yazici H., Turunç M., Ozdoğan H., Yurdakul S., Akinci A., Barnes C. G. Observer variation in grading sacroiliac radiographs might be a cause of 'sacroiliitis' reported in certain disease states. Ann Rheum Dis. 1987 Feb;46(2):139–145. doi: 10.1136/ard.46.2.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Yu W., Feng F., Dion E., Yang H., Jiang M., Genant H. K. Comparison of radiography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of sacroiliitis accompanying ankylosing spondylitis. Skeletal Radiol. 1998 Jun;27(6):311–320. doi: 10.1007/s002560050388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. van der Linden S. M., Khan M. A., Rentsch H. U., Gerber N., Cats A., Valkenburg H. A., Tugwell P. X. Chest pain without radiographic sacroiliitis in relatives of patients with ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 1988;15(5):836–839. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. van der Linden S., Valkenburg H. A., Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 1984 Apr;27(4):361–368. doi: 10.1002/art.1780270401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES