Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases logoLink to Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
. 2003 Jul;62(7):611–616. doi: 10.1136/ard.62.7.611

Course of radiographic damage over 10 years in a cohort with early rheumatoid arthritis

E Lindqvist 1, K Jonsson 1, T Saxne 1, K Eberhardt 1
PMCID: PMC1754610  PMID: 12810421

Abstract

Objective: To investigate development of radiographic damage in hands and feet of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) monitored prospectively for 10 years, and to search for prognostic factors.

Patients and methods: 181 patients with early RA (mean disease duration one year) were assessed annually with radiographs of hands and feet during years 0–5 and at year 10. Radiographs were evaluated according to Larsen (range 0–200). Predictive factors for progressive disease for years 0–5 and 5–10 were evaluated by logistic regression analyses.

Results: 82/168 (49%) patients had erosions at inclusion and almost all became erosive with time (90% after two years and 96% after 10 years). Radiographic progression was most rapid during the first two years and 75% of all damage occurred during the first five years. The median Larsen score increased from 6 at inclusion to 41 after five years and 54 after 10 years. Only 5.3% of all evaluated joints became maximally eroded, the second metacarpophalangeal joint being the most commonly affected. Mean ESR during the first three months and rheumatoid factor status were significant predictors for radiographic progressive disease, it was not possible to predict non-progressive disease.

Conclusions: Joint damage in hands and feet developed early and progression was most rapid during the first years of disease. The different rates of progression at different stages should be considered in the design of trials of drugs aimed at retarding joint damage. Disease activity at study start influenced the degree of joint damage during the entire 10 years.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (130.4 KB).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The Larsen scores at each year. The box plots show the median and 10th, 25th, 75th, and 90th centiles. All changes in Larsen scores were highly significant (p<0.001).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Progression rates of radiographic damage for each year during the first five years and from year 5–10. The box plots show the median and 10th, 25th, 75th, and 90th centiles.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Percentage of examined joints with erosive changes (Larsen 2–5).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Number of patients with at least one joint with maximal Larsen score (5).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brook A., Corbett M. Radiographic changes in early rheumatoid disease. Ann Rheum Dis. 1977 Feb;36(1):71–73. doi: 10.1136/ard.36.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bruynesteyn Karin, van der Heijde Désirée, Boers Maarten, Saudan Ariane, Peloso Paul, Paulus Harold, Houben Harry, Griffiths Bridget, Edmonds John, Bresnihan Barry. Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in rheumatoid arthritis joint damage of the Sharp/van der Heijde and Larsen/Scott scoring methods by clinical experts and comparison with the smallest detectable difference. Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Apr;46(4):913–920. doi: 10.1002/art.10190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Corbett M., Dalton S., Young A., Silman A., Shipley M. Factors predicting death, survival and functional outcome in a prospective study of early rheumatoid disease over fifteen years. Br J Rheumatol. 1993 Aug;32(8):717–723. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/32.8.717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Drossaers-Bakker K. W., de Buck M., van Zeben D., Zwinderman A. H., Breedveld F. C., Hazes J. M. Long-term course and outcome of functional capacity in rheumatoid arthritis: the effect of disease activity and radiologic damage over time. Arthritis Rheum. 1999 Sep;42(9):1854–1860. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199909)42:9<1854::AID-ANR9>3.0.CO;2-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Eberhardt K. B., Rydgren L. C., Pettersson H., Wollheim F. A. Early rheumatoid arthritis--onset, course, and outcome over 2 years. Rheumatol Int. 1990;10(4):135–142. doi: 10.1007/BF02274837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Eberhardt K., Fex E., Johnson U., Wollheim F. A. Associations of HLA-DRB and -DQB genes with two and five year outcome in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1996 Jan;55(1):34–39. doi: 10.1136/ard.55.1.34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ekdahl C., Eberhardt K., Andersson S. I., Svensson B. Assessing disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Use of a Swedish version of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. Scand J Rheumatol. 1988;17(4):263–271. doi: 10.3109/03009748809098795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fex E., Jonsson K., Johnson U., Eberhardt K. Development of radiographic damage during the first 5-6 yr of rheumatoid arthritis. A prospective follow-up study of a Swedish cohort. Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Nov;35(11):1106–1115. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/35.11.1106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Genovese Mark C., Bathon Joan M., Martin Richard W., Fleischmann Roy M., Tesser John R., Schiff Michael H., Keystone Edward C., Wasko Mary Chester, Moreland Larry W., Weaver Arthur L. Etanercept versus methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: two-year radiographic and clinical outcomes. Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Jun;46(6):1443–1450. doi: 10.1002/art.10308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Graudal N. A., Jurik A. G., de Carvalho A., Graudal H. K. Radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a long-term prospective study of 109 patients. Arthritis Rheum. 1998 Aug;41(8):1470–1480. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199808)41:8<1470::AID-ART18>3.0.CO;2-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hulsmans H. M., Jacobs J. W., van der Heijde D. M., van Albada-Kuipers G. A., Schenk Y., Bijlsma J. W. The course of radiologic damage during the first six years of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Sep;43(9):1927–1940. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200009)43:9<1927::AID-ANR3>3.0.CO;2-B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Isomäki H. Long-term outcome of rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol Suppl. 1992;95:3–8. doi: 10.3109/03009749209101477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jalava S., Reunanen K. Healing of erosions in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol. 1982;11(2):97–100. doi: 10.3109/03009748209098169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kaarela K., Kautiainen H. Continuous progression of radiological destruction in seropositive rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1997 Jul;24(7):1285–1287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kuper I. H., van Leeuwen M. A., van Riel P. L., Sluiter W. J., Houtman N. M., Cats H. A., van Rijswijk M. H. Influence of a ceiling effect on the assessment of radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis during the first 6 years of disease. J Rheumatol. 1999 Feb;26(2):268–276. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Larsen A., Dale K., Eek M. Radiographic evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis and related conditions by standard reference films. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1977 Jul;18(4):481–491. doi: 10.1177/028418517701800415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lassere M., Boers M., van der Heijde D., Boonen A., Edmonds J., Saudan A., Verhoeven A. C. Smallest detectable difference in radiological progression. J Rheumatol. 1999 Mar;26(3):731–739. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lindqvist E., Saxne T., Geborek P., Eberhardt K. Ten year outcome in a cohort of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: health status, disease process, and damage. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Dec;61(12):1055–1059. doi: 10.1136/ard.61.12.1055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lipsky P. E., van der Heijde D. M., St Clair E. W., Furst D. E., Breedveld F. C., Kalden J. R., Smolen J. S., Weisman M., Emery P., Feldmann M. Infliximab and methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Trial in Rheumatoid Arthritis with Concomitant Therapy Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000 Nov 30;343(22):1594–1602. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200011303432202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Menninger H., Meixner C., Söndgen W. Progression and repair in radiographs of hands and forefeet in early rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1995 Jun;22(6):1048–1054. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Molenaar E. T., Boers M., van der Heijde D. M., Alarcón G., Bresnihan B., Cardiel M., Edmonds J., Felson D., Furst D. E., Kirwan J. Imaging in rheumatoid arthritis: results of group discussions. J Rheumatol. 1999 Mar;26(3):749–751. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Möttönen T., Paimela L., Ahonen J., Helve T., Hannonen P., Leirisalo-Repo M. Outcome in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis treated according to the "sawtooth" strategy. Arthritis Rheum. 1996 Jun;39(6):996–1005. doi: 10.1002/art.1780390617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. O'Sullivan M. M., Lewis P. A., Newcombe R. G., Broderick N. J., Robinson D. A., Coles E. C., Jessop J. D. Precision of Larsen grading of radiographs in assessing progression of rheumatoid arthritis in individual patients. Ann Rheum Dis. 1990 May;49(5):286–289. doi: 10.1136/ard.49.5.286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pincus T., Callahan L. F., Fuchs H. A., Larsen A., Kaye J. Quantitative analysis of hand radiographs in rheumatoid arthritis: time course of radiographic changes, relation to joint examination measures, and comparison of different scoring methods. J Rheumatol. 1995 Oct;22(10):1983–1989. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Plant M. J., Jones P. W., Saklatvala J., Ollier W. E., Dawes P. T. Patterns of radiological progression in early rheumatoid arthritis: results of an 8 year prospective study. J Rheumatol. 1998 Mar;25(3):417–426. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rau R., Wassenberg S., Herborn G., Perschel W. T., Freitag G. Identification of radiologic healing phenomena in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2001 Dec;28(12):2608–2615. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Scott D. L., Coulton B. L., Popert A. J. Long term progression of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1986 May;45(5):373–378. doi: 10.1136/ard.45.5.373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sharp J. T., Strand V., Leung H., Hurley F., Loew-Friedrich I. Treatment with leflunomide slows radiographic progression of rheumatoid arthritis: results from three randomized controlled trials of leflunomide in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Leflunomide Rheumatoid Arthritis Investigators Group. Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Mar;43(3):495–505. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200003)43:3<495::AID-ANR4>3.0.CO;2-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sharp J. T., Wolfe F., Mitchell D. M., Bloch D. A. The progression of erosion and joint space narrowing scores in rheumatoid arthritis during the first twenty-five years of disease. Arthritis Rheum. 1991 Jun;34(6):660–668. doi: 10.1002/art.1780340606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sharp J. T., Young D. Y., Bluhm G. B., Brook A., Brower A. C., Corbett M., Decker J. L., Genant H. K., Gofton J. P., Goodman N. How many joints in the hands and wrists should be included in a score of radiologic abnormalities used to assess rheumatoid arthritis? Arthritis Rheum. 1985 Dec;28(12):1326–1335. doi: 10.1002/art.1780281203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Silman A., Symmons D. Reporting requirements for longitudinal observational studies in rheumatology. J Rheumatol. 1999 Feb;26(2):481–483. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Truedsson L., Sjöholm A. G., Sturfelt G. Complement activating rheumatoid factors in rheumatoid arthritis studied by haemolysis in gel: relation to antibody class and response to treatment with podophyllotoxin derivatives. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1985 Jan-Mar;3(1):29–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Uhlig T., Smedstad L. M., Vaglum P., Moum T., Gérard N., Kvien T. K. The course of rheumatoid arthritis and predictors of psychological, physical and radiographic outcome after 5 years of follow-up. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2000 Jul;39(7):732–741. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/39.7.732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Welsing P. M., van Gestel A. M., Swinkels H. L., Kiemeney L. A., van Riel P. L. The relationship between disease activity, joint destruction, and functional capacity over the course of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Sep;44(9):2009–2017. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200109)44:9<2009::AID-ART349>3.0.CO;2-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wolfe F., Sharp J. T. Radiographic outcome of recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis: a 19-year study of radiographic progression. Arthritis Rheum. 1998 Sep;41(9):1571–1582. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199809)41:9<1571::AID-ART7>3.0.CO;2-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. van Der Heijde D., Boonen A., Boers M., Kostense P., van Der Linden S. Reading radiographs in chronological order, in pairs or as single films has important implications for the discriminative power of rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Rheumatology (Oxford) 1999 Dec;38(12):1213–1220. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/38.12.1213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. van der Heijde D. M., van Leeuwen M. A., van Riel P. L., Koster A. M., van 't Hof M. A., van Rijswijk M. H., van de Putte L. B. Biannual radiographic assessments of hands and feet in a three-year prospective followup of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1992 Jan;35(1):26–34. doi: 10.1002/art.1780350105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. van der Heijde D. M., van Leeuwen M. A., van Riel P. L., van de Putte L. B. Radiographic progression on radiographs of hands and feet during the first 3 years of rheumatoid arthritis measured according to Sharp's method (van der Heijde modification). J Rheumatol. 1995 Sep;22(9):1792–1796. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. van der Heijde D. M., van Riel P. L., Nuver-Zwart I. H., Gribnau F. W., vad de Putte L. B. Effects of hydroxychloroquine and sulphasalazine on progression of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 1989 May 13;1(8646):1036–1038. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)92442-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. van der Heijde D. M., van Riel P. L., van Leeuwen M. A., van 't Hof M. A., van Rijswijk M. H., van de Putte L. B. Prognostic factors for radiographic damage and physical disability in early rheumatoid arthritis. A prospective follow-up study of 147 patients. Br J Rheumatol. 1992 Aug;31(8):519–525. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/31.8.519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. van der Heijde D., Boers M., Lassere M. Methodological issues in radiographic scoring methods in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1999 Mar;26(3):726–730. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. van der Heijde D. How to read radiographs according to the Sharp/van der Heijde method. J Rheumatol. 1999 Mar;26(3):743–745. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. van der Heijde D., Lassere M., Edmonds J., Kirwan J., Strand V., Boers M. Minimal clinically important difference in plain films in RA: group discussions, conclusions, and recommendations. OMERACT Imaging Task Force. J Rheumatol. 2001 Apr;28(4):914–917. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. van der Heijde Désirée, Simon Lee, Smolen Josef, Strand Vibeke, Sharp John, Boers Maarten, Breedveld Ferdinand, Weisman Michael, Weinblatt Michael, Rau Rolf. How to report radiographic data in randomized clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis: guidelines from a roundtable discussion. Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Apr 15;47(2):215–218. doi: 10.1002/art.10181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES