Skip to main content
PMC home page
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases logoLink to Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
. 2004 Nov;63(11):1427–1433. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.016477

Validity and reliability of three definitions of hip osteoarthritis: cross sectional and longitudinal approach

M Reijman 1, J Hazes 1, H Pols 1, R Bernsen 1, B Koes 1, S Bierma-Zeinstra 1
PMCID: PMC1754809  PMID: 15479891

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the reliability and validity in a large open population of three frequently used radiological definitions of hip osteoarthritis (OA): Kellgren and Lawrence grade, minimal joint space (MJS), and Croft grade; and to investigate whether the validity of the three definitions of hip OA is sex dependent.

Methods: Subjects from the Rotterdam study (aged ⩾55 years, n = 3585) were evaluated. The inter-rater reliability was tested in a random set of 148 x rays. The validity was expressed as the ability to identify patients who show clinical symptoms of hip OA (construct validity) and as the ability to predict total hip replacement (THR) at follow up (predictive validity).

Results: Inter-rater reliability was similar for the Kellgren and Lawrence grade and MJS (κ statistics 0.68 and 0.62, respectively) but lower for Croft's grade (κ statistic, 0.51). The Kellgren and Lawrence grade and MJS showed the strongest associations with clinical symptoms of hip OA. Sex appeared to be an effect modifier for Kellgren and Lawrence and MJS definitions, women showing a stronger association between grading and symptoms than men. However, the sex dependency was attributed to differences in height between women and men. The Kellgren and Lawrence grade showed the highest predictive value for THR at follow up.

Conclusions: Based on these findings, Kellgren and Lawrence still appears to be a useful OA definition for epidemiological studies focusing on the presence of hip OA.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (83.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altman R. D., Hochberg M., Murphy W. A., Jr, Wolfe F., Lequesne M. Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1995 Sep;3 (Suppl A):3–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Antoniades L., MacGregor A. J., Matson M., Spector T. D. A cotwin control study of the relationship between hip osteoarthritis and bone mineral density. Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Jul;43(7):1450–1455. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200007)43:7<1450::AID-ANR6>3.0.CO;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Auleley G. R., Duche A., Drape J. L., Dougados M., Ravaud P. Measurement of joint space width in hip osteoarthritis: influence of joint positioning and radiographic procedure. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2001 Apr;40(4):414–419. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/40.4.414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Auleley G. R., Rousselin B., Ayral X., Edouard-Noel R., Dougados M., Ravaud P. Osteoarthritis of the hip: agreement between joint space width measurements on standing and supine conventional radiographs. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998 Sep;57(9):519–523. doi: 10.1136/ard.57.9.519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bierma-Zeinstra S., Bohnen A., Ginai A., Prins A., Verhaar J. Validity of American College of Rheumatology criteria for diagnosing hip osteoarthritis in primary care research. J Rheumatol. 1999 May;26(5):1129–1133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Birrell F., Croft P., Cooper C., Hosie G., Macfarlane G. J., Silman A. Radiographic change is common in new presenters in primary care with hip pain. PCR Hip Study Group. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2000 Jul;39(7):772–775. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/39.7.772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Birrell F., Croft P., Cooper C., Hosie G., Macfarlane G., Silman A. Health impact of pain in the hip region with and without radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis: a study of new attenders to primary care. The PCR Hip Study Group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2000 Nov;59(11):857–863. doi: 10.1136/ard.59.11.857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brazier J. E., Harper R., Munro J., Walters S. J., Snaith M. L. Generic and condition-specific outcome measures for people with osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology (Oxford) 1999 Sep;38(9):870–877. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/38.9.870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Buchbinder R., Goel V., Bombardier C., Hogg-Johnson S. Classification systems of soft tissue disorders of the neck and upper limb: do they satisfy methodological guidelines? J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Feb;49(2):141–149. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00519-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Buckland-Wright J. C. Quantitative radiography of osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1994 Apr;53(4):268–275. doi: 10.1136/ard.53.4.268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Croft P., Cooper C., Coggon D. Case definition of hip osteoarthritis in epidemiologic studies. J Rheumatol. 1994 Apr;21(4):591–592. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Croft P., Cooper C., Wickham C., Coggon D. Defining osteoarthritis of the hip for epidemiologic studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Sep;132(3):514–522. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dekker J., Boot B., van der Woude L. H., Bijlsma J. W. Pain and disability in osteoarthritis: a review of biobehavioral mechanisms. J Behav Med. 1992 Apr;15(2):189–214. doi: 10.1007/BF00848325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Donner A., Eliasziw M. A goodness-of-fit approach to inference procedures for the kappa statistic: confidence interval construction, significance-testing and sample size estimation. Stat Med. 1992 Aug;11(11):1511–1519. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780111109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dougados M., Gueguen A., Nguyen M., Berdah L., Lequesne M., Mazieres B., Vignon E. Requirement for total hip arthroplasty: an outcome measure of hip osteoarthritis? J Rheumatol. 1999 Apr;26(4):855–861. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Felson D. T., Anderson J. J. Methodological and statistical approaches to criteria development in rheumatic diseases. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1995 May;9(2):253–266. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3579(05)80189-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Felson D. T., Zhang Y. An update on the epidemiology of knee and hip osteoarthritis with a view to prevention. Arthritis Rheum. 1998 Aug;41(8):1343–1355. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199808)41:8<1343::AID-ART3>3.0.CO;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fox K. M., Hochberg M. C., Resnik C. S., Kenzora J. E., Hebel J. R., Zimmerman S. I., Hudson J., Magaziner J. Severity of radiographic findings in hip osteoarthritis associated with total hip arthroplasty. J Rheumatol. 1996 Apr;23(4):693–697. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Günther K. P., Sun Y. Reliability of radiographic assessment in hip and knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1999 Mar;7(2):239–246. doi: 10.1053/joca.1998.0152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hirsch R., Fernandes R. J., Pillemer S. R., Hochberg M. C., Lane N. E., Altman R. D., Bloch D. A., Knowler W. C., Bennett P. H. Hip osteoarthritis prevalence estimates by three radiographic scoring systems. Arthritis Rheum. 1998 Feb;41(2):361–368. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199802)41:2<361::AID-ART21>3.0.CO;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hofman A., Grobbee D. E., de Jong P. T., van den Ouweland F. A. Determinants of disease and disability in the elderly: the Rotterdam Elderly Study. Eur J Epidemiol. 1991 Jul;7(4):403–422. doi: 10.1007/BF00145007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ingvarsson T., Hägglund G., Lindberg H., Lohmander L. S. Assessment of primary hip osteoarthritis: comparison of radiographic methods using colon radiographs. Ann Rheum Dis. 2000 Aug;59(8):650–653. doi: 10.1136/ard.59.8.650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. KELLGREN J. H., LAWRENCE J. S. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957 Dec;16(4):494–502. doi: 10.1136/ard.16.4.494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lanyon Peter, Muir Kenneth, Doherty Sally, Doherty Michael. Age and sex differences in hip joint space among asymptomatic subjects without structural change: implications for epidemiologic studies. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Apr;48(4):1041–1046. doi: 10.1002/art.10886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. MacGregor A. J., Antoniades L., Matson M., Andrew T., Spector T. D. The genetic contribution to radiographic hip osteoarthritis in women: results of a classic twin study. Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Nov;43(11):2410–2416. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200011)43:11<2410::AID-ANR6>3.0.CO;2-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Odding E., Valkenburg H. A., Algra D., Vandenouweland F. A., Grobbee D. E., Hofman A. Associations of radiological osteoarthritis of the hip and knee with locomotor disability in the Rotterdam Study. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998 Apr;57(4):203–208. doi: 10.1136/ard.57.4.203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ravaud P., Chastang C., Auleley G. R., Giraudeau B., Royant V., Amor B., Genant H. K., Dougados M. Assessment of joint space width in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a comparison of 4 measuring instruments. J Rheumatol. 1996 Oct;23(10):1749–1755. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ravaud P., Dougados M. Radiographic assessment in osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol. 1997 Apr;24(4):786–791. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Reijman M., Hazes J. M. W., Koes B. W., Verhagen A. P., Bierma-Zeinstra S. M. A. Validity, reliability, and applicability of seven definitions of hip osteoarthritis used in epidemiological studies: a systematic appraisal. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Mar;63(3):226–232. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.010348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Steultjens M. P., Dekker J., van Baar M. E., Oostendorp R. A., Bijlsma J. W. Muscle strength, pain and disability in patients with osteoarthritis. Clin Rehabil. 2001 Jun;15(3):331–341. doi: 10.1191/026921501673178408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sun Y., Günther K. P., Brenner H. Reliability of radiographic grading of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Scand J Rheumatol. 1997;26(3):155–165. doi: 10.3109/03009749709065675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Walter S. D., Eliasziw M., Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med. 1998 Jan 15;17(1):101–110. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980115)17:1<101::aid-sim727>3.0.co;2-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. van Baar M. E., Assendelft W. J., Dekker J., Oostendorp R. A., Bijlsma J. W. Effectiveness of exercise therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum. 1999 Jul;42(7):1361–1369. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199907)42:7<1361::AID-ANR9>3.0.CO;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. van Baar M. E., Dekker J., Lemmens J. A., Oostendorp R. A., Bijlsma J. W. Pain and disability in patients with osteoarthritis of hip or knee: the relationship with articular, kinesiological, and psychological characteristics. J Rheumatol. 1998 Jan;25(1):125–133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. van Baar M. E., Dekker J., Oostendorp R. A., Bijl D., Voorn T. B., Bijlsma J. W. Effectiveness of exercise in patients with osteoarthritis of hip or knee: nine months' follow up. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Dec;60(12):1123–1130. doi: 10.1136/ard.60.12.1123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES